| Did Mary Descend From David? Joseph Francis Alward Alleged prophecies relating to the Jesus'
David ancestry and his virgin-birth have long been a source of
confusion and argument. In what follows, we will describe this
conflict and the attempts by inerrantists to resolve it by claiming
that Jesus' connection to David was through Jesus' mother, Mary. |
![]() Joseph Weds Mary |
| Jesus Descended From
King David The Old Testament tells us that from the
seed of King David will arise a savior of Judea who will rule the
earth: "The LORD hath sworn in truth unto David; he will not turn from it; Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon thy throne.....I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely."(Psalms 132:11 and Jeremiah 23:5-6)
Apostle Paul also noted that Jesus was a
descendant of David: "Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord,
which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh (Romans
1:3). Since a man born of a virgin and a holy ghost has no
mortal father, it is impossible that Jesus was the biological
son of Joseph who descended from David. Thus, Jesus' birth could not
have fulfilled the David prophecy unless Mary, his mother, was
descended from David. We will now explore this possibility.
Defenders of inerrancy, who strain
mightily to prove that their Jesus was of the seed of David, point to
the genealogy in Luke: "And Jesus himself began to be about
thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which
was the son of Heli."(Luke
3:23). Inerrantists reject the obvious meaning of this verse
and claim that the word "which" refers all the way back to
Jesus--not to Joseph. Thus, the inerrantists claim that Jesus was a
"son", or descendant, of Heli, who they allege must have
been an ancestor of Mary. Once the reader jumps over that hurdle
of unbelievability, the inerrantists claim that the readers should be
able to reason through a two step logical argument which leads to the
conclusion that Mary is the daughter of Heli. Here is the argument:
Thus, in order to fulfill the prophecy
that Jesus was of the seed of David, but still virgin-born, the
inerrantists have to attach an improbable interpretation to the
wording of Luke 3:23, then pretend that Luke believed that his future
readers would naturally and without difficulty work their way through
the logic above, without help.
No matter how inerrantists present their
extremely improbable case for Mary being a descendant of David, it
wouldn't matter since even if there had been any
suggestion that Jesus traced his lineage back to David through his mother,
the Bible writers would have been laughed out of town because, in
Biblical times, "Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg wasn't discovered until 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children." [1]
Mary Was Levitic, Not
Davidic There is no evidence that Mary was a
descendant of David, but Dennis McKinsey, the editor of Biblical
Errancy [2], points out there is some evidence that
she was a member of a completely separate line, a descendant of Levi,
the great-grandfather of Aaron and Moses. That evidence comes from the
pen of Luke, who wrote that Elisabeth, who was a daughter of Aaron,
was the cousin of Mary. Here is the story: After telling Mary that the Holy Ghost
would cause the virgin Mary to conceive Jesus, he also tells her that
he had already done something similar for her cousin: "There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. (Luke 1:5)....And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren."(Luke 1:36)
We have seen that it is very difficult to
accept the inerrantists' interpretation of Luke's writings. The
readers should ask themselves: Which is more likely: that the bible
was written by fallible men, or, every word in the bible is literally
the word of god? [2] Biblical Errancy, Issue
Number 6, June, 1983. This article needs revising. Include comments about the Cursed line. Jer 22 shows the Cursed Line. See Big Bible Lessons on my page. |