Why Would NASA Cover Up?

Back to home page

The big reason NASA would want to cover up is religion or philosophy -- call it what you will. NASA has a hidden agenda they are trying to push over on us, and they will tell us anything that supports that agenda but suppress any data that does not.

The real war occurring on this planet is and always has been a struggle between God and those who are against Him. Anyone who is not for God is against Him. NASA is not an organization dedicated to God. It is not a neutral organization either.

You do not believe this? Think about it awhile. 

We recently learned that our government is capable of covering up. Our president apologized recently for an incident that had been going on for half a century. Some men had not been treated for syphillis as an experiment while the government was denying the men were part of an experiment.

So what else might our government be hiding? If they are concealing anything, why would they want to?

There have been accusations made against the government for decades about cover-ups. The Kennedy assassination, a mysterious illness experienced by many Persian Gulf War veterans, the Marilyn Monroe suicide, the Martin Luther King assassination, the missing POWs in southeast Asia -- all of these incidents are said by many to not have happened as we were told they did.

I do not want to go into these cover-ups right now. However, I am concerned with the cover-ups in our space program. There are rumors that numerous UFO sightings, the face and pyramids on Mars, possible structures on the moon, and the seeming youth of Venus -- all have aspects about them that NASA is covering up. Why?

The most obvious reason for NASA to cover up is that if the information were made known, there would be a threat to national security. This reason is sometimes given by government officials for keeping certain information from the general public.

We do have reason to fear visitors from another world. If mankind were being visited by people from other planets, would we not be afraid? We recall from our own history that when one civilization meets another civilization the less advanced civilization usually is destroyed. What happened when Europeans came to America and met the Indians? The same thing that happened to the Indians could happen to us. Any people that could come to Earth from another planet would be more advanced than we are.

Another reason given for cover-up is that we humans are not yet ready to face the possibility that we might not be alone in this universe. Many of us would have to change our religious beliefs or our philosophy. The changes might be more than we want to handle.

Now on the subject of religion -- I think here is the real key to why the truth is not revealed to us. I know that NASA is not a religious organization -- at least according to all appearances. Furthermore, I do not think even for a minute that NASA would do anything to protect the Christian religion. Instead it would do anything to protect its own beliefs.

What is the theology of NASA? Some people suspect that in its earlier days NASA paid homage to the ancient Egyptian god Osirus. (See the Enterprisemission web page.) While I do not know for sure if NASA is secretly promoting the worship of Osirus, I do know for sure that NASA is dedicated to the standard philosophy of the science of our time -- evolution.

I have heard Christian financial planner Larry Burkett say that when he worked for NASA he was an athiest. NASA was dedicated to proving the earth is billions of years old. Every time that the space agency uncovered any data that indicated the universe was only a few thousand years old, that information was never published.

So my opinion is that the reason NASA would want to cover up is that whatever they are hiding would conflict with their religious beliefs. Notice that I rate evolution as a religion.

Now how would the face on Mars prove my fundamentalist religious convictions over the theory of evolution? Simply this -- if the face is an artificial structure and if the structure is connected with ancient earth edifices; then we could conclude that mankind once had a higher level of achievement than he has now. This idea would run counter to the central theme of evolution that man rose from primitive beginnings.

NASA is trying to promote an athiestic, secular humanist, evolutionary world view. When evidence arises that might challenge this view, that data is suppressed.

Evolution is presented as though it were a fact. The idea that the earth is billions of years old is presented as though everyone believed it.

Which brings us to the Roswell incident. Is it or is it not a coincidence that the Roswell incident occurred in 1947 -- the same year it is rumored that a group of people in this country decided the United States would no longer be a Christian nation. Secularization set in. A few years after that, prayer was removed from public schools, and Christian items were systematically removed from all public places. For those of us who remember when it was safe to walk the streets or leave your doors unlocked, the results have been disastrous.

We know from our studies of history that secularism does not last long. The Greeks went through a generation or two of unbelief. Then they became more religious than ever. The schoolmen of the late middle ages questioned the teachings of the church. Their views gained acceptance for awhile, but fizzled. Secularism does not last long. The spiritual vacuum athiesm creates will be filled with something. The question is: What?

Which brings us back to the possibility of Isis. Is the secularism we see today an attempt to lure us back to the old gods our ancestors adored before the rise of Christianity? I strongly suspect so.

Since I am a Creationist, I fit every subject into a Creationist frame. Therefore, I reject out of hand any notion that the universe might be billions of years old or that life evolved from any species to another.

So when I see something like possible structures on Mars, instead of dismissing the data as a natural phenomena (which is highly unlikely for there are too many items that look like artifacts) or crediting the structures to aliens (since it is claimed that humanity would not have progressed that far so long ago), I say the structures were built by our ancestors who were much more advanced than we are. They also lived in a friendlier universe.

I see in the data evidence that proves my theories. Therefore, I see why the other side wants to suppress this information.

It is possible that NASA is testing the waters. Anyone who looks at the available evidence for life on other planets realizes immediately none of it is conclusive. The photos we have of the face on Mars are not all that great. There are other explanations for what we see than the one presented on this page. The same thing can be said for the photos of possible structures on the moon and on Callisto. It is as though NASA is giving us enough information to get us thinking about the possibility of past life on these worlds but not enough material to prove conclusively that such life existed. They want to test us to see our reaction. Even the meteorite find of possible past life fits the category. NASA is giving us enough data to make us ponder the issue but not enough to prove it. They want to see which way our thinking will go.

Back to home page