Riverside Police Department Case #352-481
| On the night of Sunday, October 30, 1966, long before anyone was to hear
of the Zodiac killer, an 18-year-old student named Cheri Jo Bates was brutally
murdered near the parking lot of Riverside City College's library annex.
Neither rape nor robbery seemed to have been a motive, as her clothes were
undisturbed and her purse was present and intact.
After disabling her lime green Volkswagen by pulling out the distributor coil and the condenser, then disconnecting the middle wire of the distributor, the killer had apparently waited for Bates to return to her car and try to start it, whereupon he made a pretense of unsuccessfully tinkering with the engine. After this ruse, and probably with the offer of a ride, he lured her into a dark, unpaved driveway between two empty houses owned by the college, where he stabbed her three times in the chest and once in the back [Footnote 1] and slashed her several times across the throat. Police determined that the murder weapon was a small knife with a blade about 3 1/2" long by 1/2" wide [Footnote 2], but the wounds to Bates' throat were so deep and brutal as to nearly decapitate her, severing her larynx, jugular vein, and carotid artery. She had also been choked and beaten about the face. Found about ten feet from Bates' body was a paint-spattered man's Timex watch with a broken 7" wristband, stopped at around 12:23 [see illustration], which one source claims was later traced to a military PX in England. The paint was analyzed, and was found to be a common exterior house paint [Footnote 3]. Also found at the scene were the heel-print from a shoe that appeared to be close to size 10 [Footnote 4], as well as hair, blood, and skin tissue found in the victim's hands and beneath her fingernails. Greasy, unidentified palm- and fingerprints were also found in and on her car, about 200 feet away. Although the library closed at 9:00 p.m. (and books found in her car verify that she had been inside before then), two separate witnesses reported hearing an "awful scream" at around 10:30, followed by "a muted scream, and then a loud sound like an old car being started up" [Footnote 5] about two minutes later, and this is generally accepted as the time of her death leaving a window of about an hour and a half that Bates may have spent conversing with the man who would kill her. Judging by these details, the murder of Cheri Jo Bates would appear to be nothing more mysterious than a particularly vicious crime of passion, committed perhaps by a spurned suitor, an ex-boyfriend, or a subject somehow linked to Miss Bates. The simple fact that Bates spent over an hour in the dark with the man who murdered her suggests that she knew and trusted him enough to converse more than casually. It wasn't until almost exactly one month after the attack that the case approached a bizarre new level.
On November 29, 1966, carbon copies of an anonymous letter were mailed to
the Riverside Police and the Riverside Enterprise
[see
Illustration]. Typed using a portable Royal typewriter with either Pica
or Elite typeface
[Footnote 6], it
was entitled "The Confession," and carried a "byline" that consisted of the
word "BY" followed by twelve underscores. Both copies were on low-quality
white paper eight inches wide and torn at the top and bottom so as to be
roughly squarish, and had been sent unstamped and with no return address
from a secluded rural mailbox. Presumably, the author planned on the
letters being sent by Postage Due mail. At least one of the details
referred to in this letter had not been made public, and at the time,
investigators agreed that it was most likely genuine, though this opinion
has changed over the years. THE CONFESSION BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The killer's claim that "she did not put up a struggle" was contradicted by the flesh and hair found beneath Bates' fingernails and the churned-up ground at the scene, and while a contemporaneous newspaper report reflects uncertainty as to whether the knife actually broke in her body [Footnote 8], more recent pronouncements from RPD detectives are unanimous that the knife did not break [Footnote 9]. The phone call that is referred to near the end of the letter has never been elaborated on by authorities, though researcher Tom Voigt suggests that it was placed to the Riverside Press, rather than the police, and so went misunderstood and ignored.
The letters were delivered on the same day they were posted. The next
day, November 30th, both the Enterprise and the local police submitted
their copies to the Riverside County Postal Inspector, who in turn notified
the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Murder is not a federal crime,
but extortion through the mail is, and the FBI briefly considered joining
the investigation under this pretense. However, since no specific victim
of extortion was named or alluded to, there would be no federal aid in the
investigation. In an unexplained turn of events, what appears to be
a photocopy of the "Confession" was attached to an FBI report declassified
in the 1990s, but the typescript and number of words per line are different
from those in the well-known copy that appears in a photograph of the letter
lying either on a detective's or a reporter's desk.
The cryptic signature, "rh," may have been a reference to RCC's President
at the time, R. H. Bradshaw. The copy without the heiroglyph signature, sent to Joseph Bates, substituted "Bates" with "She" [Footnote 12]. One latent fingerprint was developed on the letter sent to the Riverside Police Department, but its origins are not known, and it has never been matched to a suspect [Footnote 13].
In the wake of Bates' murder, Riverside Police worked the case under the assumption that the killer was known to Bates, or at least that Bates was known to her killer. They even identified a likely suspect from a pool of viable candidates, an ex-boyfriend bitter over their breakup and resentful of her blossoming relationship with a football player. (The RPD maintains a local man as their prime suspect in the murder, and in December of 1998 even went so far as to secure a warrant for samples of this man's hair, skin, and saliva, which were sent to the FBI crime lab to be checked against the evidence found at the scene. While no formal report has been made public, rumor has it that the testing came back with no match to the local suspect.) When the Zodiac case exploded into national news in the fall of 1969, though, RPD Chief L.T. Kinkead nevertheless sent a 3-page synopsis of the local murder and the events that followed to investigators in Napa and San Francisco, a letter that seems to have been largely ignored. It wasn't until Paul Avery of the San Francisco Chronicle initiated a 1970 meeting between these investigators that they began to consider the elusive Bay Area serial killer as a possible culprit, though even then RPD Captain Irwin Cross "expressed doubt that the Zodiac [was] responsible" [Footnote 14]. Despite the stylistic similarities between the aftermath of Cheri Jo Bates' murder and the linked murders that would later take place in the San Francisco Bay Area, the current opinion of the Riverside Police Department and many other investigators is that the Riverside and Bay Area episodes were not related. Opinion is split, however, as to who authored the 1966 and 1967 documents, and whether they were even written by the same person. |
See Also: Paul
Avery and the Riverside Connection
See Also:
Riverside and the Zodiac
All text on this page copyright 1996-2006 by Jake Wark. Click here to send mail.