|
|||||||||||
|
As a Seattle native, I was happy to see that his bio said he was from there originally (more specifically, White Center). I couldn't think of any poet from Seattle that I'd seen in a real book before. His contribution to the anthology was a small series of personable "letters." His picture put me off a little. It looked kind of thuggish and slow but likable; definitely NOT poet-like. Sixteen years later in Illinois, I went to the library to find a recommended book of writing instruction called "The Triggering Town." I recognized Hugo's picture on the back cover immediately. I also found his autobiography "The Real West Marginal Way," and grabbed it first, eager as always for anything mentioning Seattle. I read it in the musty basement of the library, laughing (and crying) out loud. Like many poetic hopefuls, I have searched for some writer to identify with--some encouraging "like mind"--but most of all I looked for an American poet. The most elegant, perfectly put words I loved first were of Edna St. Vincent Millay and Sylvia Plath, both of whom died prematurely (self-inflicted or otherwise), as did Emily Dickinson. How could a novice female writer not conclude that poetry kills women, or perhaps writing poetry kills, or else you must be suicidally despairing to capture truth in words so well? I could not be that kind of poet. Although I do not even attempt to put my poetry on the same shelf as Richard Hugo's, I do know that I share his love of the natural world and a fascination with places as much as people. Hugo's poetry is lean and honest, and his voice is unmistakable. What I have been able to piece together of Hugo from all of his writing is the clear but forgiving vision of a hopeful realist. Joan Daugherty, September 1996
Guestbook/Baseball/Poems] |
|||||||||||