Above and Beyond Hockey
cover................................ The Death of Hockey.... cover................................
the
DEATH
of
HOCKEY
or: how a bunch of guys
with too much money and too little sense
are killing the greatest game on earth

-- and how the fans can save it
_____________________________________________________

above & beyond .. death of hockey .. new compendium .. the authors .. buy this book
news .. fan forum .. crosswords .. trophy case .. bookshelf .. hockey links


click here for NetScape version of this page
_____________________________________________________


Read the Reviews

Extensive excerpts from The Death of Hockey have been featured in respected periodicals 
including Saturday Night, the Ottawa Citizen, and the London Free Press. In addition,
here's what some of the most outstanding newspapers across Canada have had to say
about the book...
The National Post ... Vue/interVue ... The Toronto Star
The Globe & Mail ... Quill & Quire

_________________________________________________________________

National Post [www.nationalpost.com]
  
NATIONAL POST SPORTS Guy Vanderhaeghe 15 December 1998
Authors reveal weird, wacky and warm world of hockey - and had a bloody good time: American sportswriters confess they like a good brawl, but recognize slugfests lead many people to equate the NHL to Roller Derby and the World Wrestling Federation.

Many lapsed believers have a nostalgia for the lost faith, and a conviction that they had perfectly good reasons for losing it.
It is a description which fits me, a former hockey fan. I now find a televised NHL game as entertaining as a bladder-repair operation on The Learning Channel.
I continue to play hockey with towering ineptitude both winter and summer, but have discovered it is much more amusing to disappoint myself with my own on-ice antics than to watch millionaire professionals disappoint me with theirs.
The American sportswriters Klein and Reif offer a compelling justification for hockey apostasy. Their complaints in The Death of Hockey are familiar enough: The NHL's refusal to enforce the rules; its preference for size over skill; the rampant expansion of the league; the flight of teams from traditional hockey centres to the Sun Belt; a bloated season of 82 games, too many to be meaningful, and far too many to develop healthy club rivalries; etc., etc.
What is refreshing about Klein and Reif is that they skewer NHL hypocrisy with the inspired lunacy of the Marx Brothers.
Having heard so often that "fighting is part of the game," they decided to treat it that way in the pages of The Village Voice, running a column devoted to hockey donnybrooks. League officials were not happy. "Why do you print that garbage?" one of them demanded angrily.
Klein and Reif describe this "as an example of the profound cognitive dissonance between what the NHL allows and doesn't like to see mentioned."
Typically, the NHL's response to mayhem on skates has been to institute 38 rule changes in 37 years, many of which could have been drafted by Woody Allen.
"Gentlemen, combatants will be thrown out of the game unless visored helmets are removed before battle commences! Gentlemen, no punch-ups with tape on your hands!"
And, perhaps the wackiest of all: If jersey and upper-body gear are stripped off, the bare-chested fighter will be tossed. This a commandment chiselled in response to wily Rob Ray, who tied his sweater to his gear so that when an opposing gladiator pulled his sweater over Ray's head, "Razor" would be free to flail away unencumbered. A ploy which caused telecaster John Davidson to shriek, hilariously: "It's not manly!"
Well, yes. But at least Klein and Reif are clear-sighted about the solution. They confess to liking hockey brawls, but also recognize they hurt the game, leading many people to equate these highjinks with the Roller Derby and the World Wrestling Federation. Their solution? Something simple. Do what every other legitimate pro sport has done: outlaw fighting.
This is how they expose all the absurdities of the NHL: report them dead-pan, mischievously puncture them, and preach common sense. The result is a lively, entertaining, vitriolic dissection of the game by two writers whose passion for hockey and whose desire to see it fixed are incandescent.
(Guy Vanderhaeghe lives in Saskatoon and is a regular contributor to the National Post. His latest novel, The Englishman's Boy, was published to critical acclaim.)
__________________________________________________________

Vue/interVue [vue.ab.ca/index.htm]
  
VUE (Edmonton) books revue T.C. Shaw  January 7-13, 1999

Book tells why hockey is so pucked up Americans blame game's decline on callous owners
"Hockey must be a great game to survive the men who run it."
That, ironically, is a quote from Conn Smythe, a Hall-of-Famer and one of the NHL's chief builders. It amply illustrates that the problems caused by an uncaring administration are nothing new to the NHL, but hockey is currently under attack from its own ranks like never before. If you believe it's only the residents of Quebec City and Winnipeg who are still riled about losing their NHL franchises, think again.
A decent number of hockey fans who have watched their game become a shadow of its former self are becoming angry enough to do something about it. In fact, two U.S.-based writers, Jeff Z. Klein and Karl-Eric Reif, have co-written what amounts to a call to arms for hockey fans, exhorting them to pay attention to the slow but sure deterioration of "the greatest game on earth" -- and to take action against the NHL for mismanaging its strongest asset: hockey played with speed, skill and, most importantly, meaning.
The Death of Hockey (or: How a bunch of guys with too much money and too little sense are killing the greatest game on earth) lambastes the NHL for ignoring hockey's rich heritage, its almost mythic traditions and immense legacy of heroes, stories and amazing anecdotes. With chapter titles such as "Paradise Lost," "More Is Less" and "Empire of the Suits," The Death of Hockey asks the ultimate question, namely: "Have all us fans doddered off into some gauzy, nostalgic fantasy of hockey that never was? Or has hockey taken a wrong turn and a running jump and thrown itself off a cliff?"
Bettman: the dark knight
The book says no, your senses haven't left you and, yes, something's definitely wrong with hockey -- but it's not the game, it's the men who run it. Klein and Reif present their arguments with wit and good old common sense, taking NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and his henchmen to task (actually, the pair neatly take Bettman apart) for turning his back on hockey's loyal base audience in a misguided attempt to attract a new one.
Always questioning Bettman's eminently questionable motives, the pair's arguments hit home on a number of fronts. They take issue with the NHL's insistence that there's something fundamentally wrong with the game as it stands. What's really wrong, contend Klein and Reif, is the league's callous disregard for its own game: tolerating oversized goalie equipment, slack officiating, needless fireworks, cloying mascots, hideous uniforms, goofy team names; allowing true rivalries to fall by the wayside -- trends that have erected an "invisible wall" between the fans and the game they love.
The passion Klein feels for the game is infectious, even over the telephone from New York. Seen through Klein's eyes, hockey becomes a religion, the Forum a temple, a cathedral. (Damn, he's right -- they never should have allowed it to be demolished.) As we talked, I started thinking about the countless moments of delirious joy, blinding fury and utter, blank dejection I've experienced simply by watching a dozen guys on skates chase a little piece of vulcanized black rubber around the ice.
According to Klein, there's a "deep connection between the fans and the game. That roar when a goal is scored, that's almost a sexual thing, and the league is tampering with it." Exhibit A in The Death of Hockey is the video replay, a device that has virtually replaced the sound of spontaneous, rapturous applause with the Jeopardy! theme while the ref awaits "the phone call upstairs." Pathetic, eh?
An Aud occurrence
Klein's experiences at his beloved Buffalo Auditorium back up his statements. In the '80's, Klein and Reif noticed the gradual, insidious disappearance of homemade signage around the Aud. They later noticed that when the signs finally reappeared, they weren't as caustically witty as they once were. (As Reif puts it, "If I hadn't been a cartoonist and graphic artist, I wouldn't have noticed that every one was hand-painted on computer paper in the same handwriting.") The ostensible reason for removing home-made signage? They were obstructing other fans' sightlines.
Klein also observes that the hellish pop music each fan must endure before each and every face-off is not about pumping up fan support. The game is supposed to do that. He maintains (and I agree wholeheartedly), that "the whole idea of these big scoreboards [and loud music] is to shut you up." How many times have you heard a "Go Oilers Go" chant start up from the nosebleed section of the Skyreach Centre (or whatever they're calling it this week), only to be drowned out by a chorus of "Jumpin' Jack Flash"? (The scoreboard will then hypocritically encourage us to "Make Noise!") The worst thing is, none of these B-grade theatrics are even necessary. As The Death of Hockey succinctly puts it, "This isn't what we came to see!"
Besides attacking the NHL's ridiculous recent attempts to sell hockey to the Sun Belt -- destroying age-old rivalries by moving teams from established hockey markets to established beach volleyball markets -- Klein and Reif address the question of rapid, unchecked expansion, which dilutes the talent pool and creates too many meaningless regular season games.
Klein and Reif expose many other league screw-ups, including permitting the demolition of rickety-but-venerable hockey cathedrals such as the Montreal Forum, Boston Garden and Detroit Olympia -- buildings with the kind of ambiance that can't be manufactured on demand -- in the name of luxury corporate skyboxes for the very few who can afford them.
Hooray for American television!
Television contracts are now the NHL's only source of the kind of revenue they need to keep the bloated league alive. Klein and Reif detail the NHL's painfully inept dealings with U.S. television networks, but argue that, no matter how much we Canadians whine, American TV coverage is all that prevents the league from losing its last shreds of respect from citizens south of the border.
The only contentious issue The Death of Hockey raises concerns fighting. Here again, American television becomes paramount to saving the game we know, and Klein and Reif convincingly argue that fisticuffs aren't even necessary in hockey. Don't just blow off their opinion, now; they've actually played the game, so it's not as if they're blowing smoke on this one. Remember that fighting really puts a black eye (if you'll pardon the expression) on the game down south -- even in places like New York, Minnesota and Michigan, where Americans already know how to "follow our puck."
If you or someone you love is experiencing withdrawal from quality hockey, Klein and Reif suggest you become organized. They have a website where your voice and opinions will be heard. You can log on to their site at ChaptersGlobe:Community:Discussions:Open Book.
You can also try the Ottawa-based NHLFA.com, which is the NHL Fans Association website, maintained by "two guys named Jim." The idea behind the site is to mirror England's Football Supporters Association, where fans' voices get heard. As Klein puts it, "If there are enough members in there, they'll become something that'll have to be listened to."
Ultimately, we fans have to get on board. "Make your opinions known," advises Klein, or the greatest game on Earth may one day become about as exciting as televised bowling, all thanks to the clowns who control the game, but who many suspect don't understand it -- or even like it that much.
__________________________________________________________


Toronto Star [www.thestar.com]
  
TORONTO STAR Out of Write Field -- Garth Woolsey December 30, 1998

Yanks score with analysis of `our' game As long as hockey is played in Canada (and that is another way of saying forever), we'll fret over the state of our game.
So, it's not surprising to read this week in these pages about a local minor hockey coach second-guessing himself and his peers, after seeing teams from other parts of the country and the world do things differently in a holiday tournament: "In Toronto," he says, "we're too concerned about winning."
You mean to say someone, somewhere plays the game differently, with other priorities? Do they actually play the game to develop skills and to engender a lasting love for it? For sportsmanship? For fun?
Another day we hear from Daniel Tkaczuk, one of Canada's better players at the world junior championships being played in Manitoba: "I think sometimes that's the difference between Canada and other countries," he says. "We need to play with so much emotion."
You mean to say Canadians don't have the level of skill and strategy to compete unless we view each game as a war on ice?
The year of self-analysis continues. Given our grandest opportunity to shine, with our very best players allowed to participate in the Olympics for the first time, our men finished fourth. Canada's women, competing for medals for the first time at Nagano, lost to the U.S. in the final. Our national juniors, so often Canada's pride and joy, wound up as abject eighth-placers at the world championships (but look much improved this week, knock on wood).
Can it be that Canada has long since lost its hockey superiority and that many of us simply won't admit it? The authors of The Death of Hockey, a couple of native Buffalonians, think so. They contend that it might have been a good thing for hockey in general but Canadian hockey in particular, for example, if Team Canada had lost the 1972 Summit Series to the Soviets.
"By winning, the Canadian hockey establishment was able to put off what many fans already saw to be true: that the European game was different, and that it was every bit as good as, maybe even better than, the Canadian one. Worse, that Team Canada won through brutality, poor sportsmanship, and let's face it, cheating (even today the fact that the Czechoslovakian referees actually called elbowing and tripping when the Canadians elbowed and tripped players is remembered as terrible, even corrupt officiating), was magically reinterpreted as winning through stronger will."
Yet international tournament hockey, in the authors' view, remains the sport at its brightest and best. What's wrong, they argue, with a hockey world in which in any given Olympics or world junior tournament six or seven nations might emerge as the best?
It is blanket condemnation of the NHL in its present state that comprises the vast majority of these often wittily written pages. The team owners, with commissioner Gary Bettman as their willing accomplice, are painted as interested only in maximizing profits through expansion into U.S. markets that have no roots in hockey. We are reminded that (mainly Canadian) tradition is abandoned, talent is diluted, fighting is anachronistic, scoring is down, some franchises are hamstrung by our peso and that teams play in mega-arenas where mind-numbing music batters fans during TV timeouts (but not enough of them are the result of interest by major U.S. networks). The season is too long. The clutching and grabbing has to stop. Mario Lemieux was right to slam the door on his way out. And so on.
We, and probably you, have heard all this before, but not in such a coherent package. Relatively speaking, this is a fine whine, not too tart, nice bouquet.
The authors sum up their thesis in the book's sub-title: How a bunch of guys with too much money and too little sense are killing the greatest game on earth. They finish with a chapter of recommendations to save the game.
Why would a Canadian publisher offer Americans such an opportunity? Well, the authors are qualified in that both have written about hockey extensively, including for The Village Voice and The New York Times. But it also is understood that Canadians often look to Americans for validation. We care, perhaps more than we should, about how we appear through others' eyes. Klein and Reif go to some pains to explain their pedigree as outsiders with the insiders' love for hockey and its birthplace. The fly cover warns: "U.S. authors write about hockey! (Try to remain calm)." It's not easy. It's hockey.
__________________________________________________________


Globe & Mail [www.theglobeandmail.com]
  
THE GLOBE & MAIL Literary Review Stephen Smith November 28, 1998
If hockey's dead, somebody tell the publishers The season's crop of shinny tomes is studded with both doomsday scenarios and nostalgic laments, but the number of books would lead you to believe the game's never been healthier.
Al Purdy it was who wrote that hockey is the Canadian specific, but I don't know, to me that's always seemed a little too narrow, too... well, specific. I mean, hockey is our history, our drama, our childhood, our lunch, our third official language, our Saturday night, our true north. It's, it's -- why, it's our very selves, isn't it? And oh yeah, in case you hadn't heard, it's sick, sick, sick.
We lost the Olympics, men and women, right? We weren't so hot in the World Cup, either, finished in eighth place (just behind Kazakhstan) in last year's World Juniors and mucked up (again) in the World Championships.
In the NHL, meantime, scoring is down, head injuries are up, overtime doesn't work and, according to Dallas Stars winger Brett Hull, "the games suck." Off the ice, ticket prices are ever more steeply ridiculous, all the grand old rinks will soon have been abandoned, and as for Winnipeg and Quebec -- well, let's just agree, generally, that Peter Gzowski may as well have coined the game's new motto when he wrote, earlier this year: "Hockey? Oh, dear."
No surprise, then, that there's a tone of lament underlying the season's hockey books. It's there in the nostalgia of books like Mike Leonetti's The Game We Knew and Hockey's Golden Era, two collections of Harold Barkley's photographs from the 1960s; and Shooting Stars: Photographs from the Portnoy Collection at the Hockey Hall of Fame, by Andrew Podnieks. They're admirable picture-books, all three, and they pine for the days when the game was younger and, they'd like to think, still innocent.
Lament is maybe too mild a word for a book as explicitly unhappy as The Death of Hockey, by U.S. journalists Jeff Z. Klein and Karl-Eric Reif (Macmillan Canada, 256 pages, $29.95). They love the game; they're about to pop a shinpad from how much they hate what's happening to it. They are, um, animated in framing their indictment, which is to say that words such as wrong, infertile, insular, fritter, boring, bloated, Black Death, stink, graceless, buffoonish, tacky, troglodyte, laughingstock, bush league and ferrchrissake! are only a few of those they apply to the NHL and the way it's run.
Many stand accused of reducing what has been called "the greatest game on earth" to a "cheap, shabby counterfeit" of what it once was, including Team Canada 1972, which not only "won through brutality, poor sportsmanship and, let's face it, cheating," but, by winning, made sure that North American hockey continued to wallow in complacency for another 10 years.
But Klein and Reif are at their fiercest fingering the true heavies, NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman and the team owners. They've allowed the league to expand too much, too fast. They've recklessly ignored faithful fans in going after a new U.S. audience. They've stuck their heads in the slush on the matter of hockey's violence. In their hurry to market the game, they've presided over its "malling" -- i.e. what was wrong with the Montreal Forum except that it didn't have enough corporate boxes? And why are teams such as the Boston Bruins permitted to uglify their sweaters?
All that, and more: The men who run the game are charged with greed and excess in the first degree. Do the authors rant too much? Well, they do rant. In the end, to their credit, they offer some solutions, many of them bright enough that the NHL is sure to pay them no heed.
__________________________________________________________


Quill & Quire [www.quillandquire.com]
  
QUILL & QUIRE Literary Review Paul Challen Spring 1999
"What's wrong with the National Hockey League these days?" That question has likely been asked thousands of times from coast to coast in this country over the last five years -– in sports bars, around office coolers, and in the cheap seats of ice rinks from coast to coast. The answers are well known by now: too many teams, not enough talent, too much fighting, and silly rule changes that have slowed what was formerly the world's fastest-moving team sport to an artless 60-minute wrestling match. Now, however, thanks to a pair of (gasp!) American authors, there is a book that actually presents a compelling indictment of the state of the present-day National Hockey League (NHL), along with some excellent arguments about how to change it. Jeff Z. Klein and Karl-Eric Reif, New York sportswriters with roots at the
Village Voice and collaborators on two previous books on the game, have taken the answers to the "what's wrong" question out of the realm of the anecdotal and into the world of good, hard evidence in this book. They've taken a serious step toward providing fans and hockey officials with some solid advice on how to avoid what they consider further humiliation of a sacred sports institution. Klein and Reif do it in inimitable style, too. Consider their condemnation of the expansion of the number of NHL franchises, a too-rapid addition of teams that most fans agree has opened up the gates to a flood of players who would never have made it out of the minor leagues 15 years ago: "Even if the desperately optimistic assumption that expansion into the American Sun Belt will magically inspire millions of kids across the southlands to suddenly start playing hockey pans out and produces thousands of young men with NHL skills," they muse, "do you really want to spend the next 20 years or more watching bad hockey while you await the arrival of this promised new wave of talent?" The Death of Hockey is one of the best "state-of-the-union" books on sports to come around in a long time. And if you love pro hockey but hate the way the NHL is going, this book is for you.
__________________________________________________________

THE DEATH OF HOCKEY
by JEFF Z. KLEIN and KARL-ERIC REIF
published by Macmillan Canada


available at Chapters, Indigo, and other fine booksellers throughout Canada
and on-line from Chapters/Indigo and the Hockey Bookshelf
chapters.................................................... indigo......................................................
Chapters [www.chapters.ca/books/ ]
buy it here!
Indigo [www.indigo.ca/ ]
buy it there!
Above and Beyond Hockey [members.aol.com/SportInfRe/IXbkshlf.htm ]
or buy it direct from the authors!

__________________________________________________________

Above and Beyond Hockey

Inside The Death of Hockey

Read the Reviews

The All-New Hockey Compendium

Meet the Authors

Contact the Authors/Join the Debate
Fan Forum

News and Archive

Professor Krypto's CrossChecks

The Trophy Case

The Hockey Bookshelf

Hockey Links

Help Storm the Barricades
National Hockey League Fans Association

Viewing the Explorer/AOL version by mistake?
NetScape 4.7 version


The Death of Hockey
published by
Macmillan Canada
(C) Jeff Z. Klein
&
Karl-Eric Reif
1998

all rights
reserved
The Death of Hockey [members.aol.com/SportInfRe/IXinside.htm ]
Above & Beyond Hockey
website
(C) Jeff Z. Klein
& Karl-Eric Reif
and
Sports Information
& Research
1999-2002, 2003

all rights
reserved



Click Here!

Website constructed by Sports Information & Research
Problems viewing, or linking to or from, this site?  Click here to let us know