Spending Too Much Money on Horse Feeds?
How to Avoid Wasting Your Bucks
Vaughn W. Henry, Henry & Associates
Breeding Farm Management Consulting
To paraphrase the old beef council ads, this article is about real food for real horses. With all the emphasis on human nutrition today, it's become much easier to discuss horse feeding questions because the terms and problems are nearly interchangeable. Horses have similar requirements to people and since there are only six nutrient classifications, let's quickly see what's available. Don't skip this next section, there are a few important points which need to be made before we get into the money angle. If you have access to reputable nutritionists, have them analyze your ration and make recommendations based on individual horse's needs or groups of horses with similar needs. In the U.S., often the local state land-grant university or Cooperative Extension Service has a specialist responsible for answering questions about horse nutrition needs. As a rule, nutrition "armchair experts" at the local feed store or coffee shop lack the required background to answer technical questions, so it makes sense to look beyond the advertising hype and "old wives' tales" and get to the real basics of nutrition for solutions to your feeding problems.
Fats are concentrated sources of energy and are well tolerated by horses.
Often they are added to rations to increase energy content, palatability,
reduce dust, keep supplements well mixed in the ration, improve hair coat
and provide a source of fat soluble vitamins and the building blocks for
natural steroid hormones. Fats may be subject to spoilage in warm weather
and should be limited to about 5-8% of the ration in most cases.
Minerals (ash) form the basis for the skeletal system, many hormones
and enzymes, and are necessary for normal metabolic functions. As a rule,
minerals are supplied in varying quantities by feed products and will depend
on the soil and growing conditions, maturity of the plant when harvested,
digestibility and availability of minerals and their interactions within
the ration. Most of the emphasis will be on macrominerals (calcium, phosphorus,
sodium, chloride, potassium, sulfur and magnesium) and microminerals, those
needed in smaller quantities (zinc, selenium, copper, iron, cobalt, iodine,
fluorine, manganese). Generally a calcium-phosphorus source and trace mineral
salt will satisfy most horse's mineral requirements if they receive a well
balanced ration of good quality feedstuffs. However, there are areas of
the country that have serious deficiencies of some minerals and excesses
of others, so consult your local nutritionist about potential shortages
or toxic influences. The calcium:phosphorus ratio is one of the best known
of mineral inter-actions, but there many others which make a mineral "team"
work within a good feed product. Mineral imbalances are much more common
and usually more severe than vitamin problems, so pay attention to those
numbers on your feed tag.
Owners typically focus on vitamin supplementation to solve problems, whether the problem is nutritional or not. Unfortunately vitamin requirements are not as well understood in the horse as in other species, but supplementation may be needed if the ration is of poor quality or if the horse is under stress from excessive training or illness. By themselves vitamins will not provide energy to a horse, but they are necessary for the horse to properly utilize feed products. Generally a high quality ration or good pasture will supply the vitamins needed by most horses, the fat soluble A,D,E,K and water soluble B and C vitamins. Fat soluble vitamins can be fed to excess, and these often cause toxicity problems and impair growth, so keep in mind that "more is not better". Excessive water soluble vitamins are generally excreted in the urine and feces, making it a expensive waste product, so don't overfeed vitamin supplements, as it's more efficient to just pour them down the drain rather than pass them through the horse.
Feed By Weight, Not Volume!
For convenience, horse owners like to feed their horses by volume (quarts,
scoops or gallons) while the directions found on most products calls for
feeding by weight. If you feed by volume you will be inconsistent in ration
mixing and feeding. The average owner will heap the coffee can full one
time and take a quick swipe through the grain the next. Your employees
may define the scoop of grain and flake of hay directions you left on the
stall door differently from your intentions and that does nothing for the
horse except promote more colics. Inconsistency is really hard on horses,
and well managed farms learn to avoid it by establishing programs that
everyone can follow. Feed requirements are based on body weight
and activity, so both young and old horses should be weighed or weight
taped to keep current on their rate of gain or loss. After all, a pound
is a pound and feeding by weight will be a more cost effective way to control
your expensive grain and hay consumption, resulting in less waste. You
will be more likely to spot changes with a scale or girth measurement than
with your eye. When you see a horse every day, little incremental changes
aren't very noticeable.
Temper this advice with good sense, if a horse weaves in his stall or
is particularly fretful, then it will use more calories than the placid
nag standing under the shade tree. Caloric recommendations are just that,
you have to tailor the numbers to fit the individual. On one occasion I
calculated a ration for a weaned foal owned by a novice. Through the whole
routine explanation about protein, mineral and energy needs for this transitional
foal I eventually developed a nice easy ration which would work satisfactorily.
A year later she told me the foal wasn't growing well at all. I asked what
she was feeding and she said, "exactly what you told me to - 6 lbs. of
grain and roughage as calculated last Spring". Silly me, I assumed that
she understood all of my comments and would boost the ration proportionally
as the foal grew and its requirements increased accordingly. Accordingly,
I have found out that the word assume must evolve from a phrase about making
an "ass of u and me". So try to be even more explicit when asking for advice,
even to the point of presuming nothing about nutrition when talking to
your advisor.
How Much Does My Horse Weigh?
Commercial weight tapes are usually within 5% accuracy, which is better
than an eyeball guesstimate and are cheaper to buy than livestock scales.
Plus it is easier to use a tape than try to get the horse to hold still
on your bathroom scales. As you haul your horse to shows or the veterinarian,
many feed elevators have scales that will accommodate your horse, stop
and ask to weigh. Remember that knowing the horse's
weight is also important in the use of many medications, so invest
in an inexpensive weight tape and quit guessing.
Focus on energy needs
Since energy is the most expensive component of your horse's diet and
the one many horse owners neglect, you must emphasize its importance. Too
many times an owner will shortchange the diet in calories and the horse
will perform poorly. To solve the problem, the owner or trainer will turn
to vitamin supplements, tonics, blood builders and other gimmicks. When
equine nutritionist, Dr. Steve Jackson, was at the University of Kentucky,
he often mentioned, in jest, using powdered bat wings as a feed supplement.
It sums up nicely the mystique that surrounds ration formulation. Someone
will develop a secret feed formula that is supposed to do everything necessary
to make a horse win, then everybody tries to jump on the bandwagon and
feed the same product. Many horse owners and trainers are the world's best
mimics, always looking for some new scheme and neglecting the basics. There
are no secrets, just pay attention to basic details.
Not every calorie is efficiently converted into useful work. Just as
a car engine wastes some fuel through friction, exhaust and heat, a horse
will lose efficiency through waste products, methane, body heat, etc. However,
calories are calories, and there are four kilocalories (kcal) produced
from each gram of protein or carbohydrate and nine kcal. from each gram
of fat. In theory you could meet a 1,000 pound horse's caloric requirements
with 64 Mars® candy bars. However, just as with people, this is not
the preferred ration because other critical nutrients are neglected. But
to prove a point, look at the following ration provided by just 7 pounds
of candy (please note, theobromine in chocolate is probably toxic to horses;
I only used the candy as an example of empty calories):
| 63.58 candy bars provides these nutrients per bar | Nutrients per day supplied just by candy bars | Daily nutritional requirements of a 1000 lb. idle horse |
| 240 Calories | 15,259 Calories (kcal.) | 15,259 Calories |
| 4 gm. Protein | 254.3 gm. Protein | 600 gm. Protein |
| 85 mg. Sodium | 5,404.3 mg. Sodium | 7,500 mg. Sodium |
Cheaper isn't always better, different feed mills have varying standards for storage, feed quality, ethics, professional advice, standardization and so on. Sometimes a more expensive feed is cheaper in the long run rather than paying for colics and crooked legs on youngsters. One concern that should always be addressed deals with molds or toxins in grains and roughages. Your feed supplier should know that the feed is used for horses, as there are additives used for other species that are toxic to horses. Equines have less tolerance for poor feed quality than many other animals, so consistency and quality are important factors in selecting your feed dealers. On an operation of any size, feed cost is also a significant factor. For example a horse farm paying 19.5 cents for each pound of their commercially bagged feed considered a number of changes for the following reasons:
Make decisions based on: cost, ease of use, safety, availability, etc.
Let's see how one would calculate the nutrients for two common rations typically used for an idle, mature horse using just alfalfa hay and corn and compare it to a common timothy hay and oats ration. To meet this "maintenance" ration, I used just two ingredients only for simplicity, as most rations would add an inexpensive vitamin-mineral supplement to fill in the gaps as needed. A column after each ration's analysis shows either a (+) that indicates the ration meets or exceeds the requirement or a (-) that indicates there is a shortage in the ration for that particular nutrient, as defined by the N.R.C. Even though the weight of the two rations is equal, the actual nutrients provided to the horse are much different.
| NUTRIENTS REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE | 6.5 lbs. Oats and 11 lbs. of Timothy Hay Provides Nutrients | 6.5 lbs. Corn and 11 lbs. of Alfalfa Hay Provides Nutrients | |||
| Digestible energy | 15.0 Mcal/day | 13.1 Mcal/day |
|
16.6 Mcal/day |
|
| Crude protein | 600 gms/day | 556 gms/day |
|
990 gms/day |
|
| Lysine | 21 gms/day | 7.82 gms/day |
|
43.2 gms/day |
|
| Calcium | 18.1 gms/day | 17.37 gms/day |
|
60.23 gms/day |
|
| Phosphorus | 12.7 gms/day | 12.9 gms/day |
|
15.9 gms/day |
|
| Magnesium | 6.8 gms/day | 6.5 gms/day |
|
17.47 gms/day |
|
| Potassium | 23 gms/day | 73.9 gms/day |
|
74.2 gms/day |
|
| Sodium | 7.5 gms/day | 3.8 gms/day |
|
5.9 gms/day |
|
| Sulfur | 11.3 gms/day | 10.7 gms/day |
|
14.6 gms/day |
|
| Iron | 300 mg/day | 1071 mg/day |
|
1036 mg/day |
|
| Zinc | 300 mg/day | 70.2 mg/day |
|
171.4 mg/day |
|
| Copper | 75 mg/day | 12.0 mg/day |
|
84.2 mg/day |
|
| Manganese | 300 mg/day | 72.3 mg/day |
|
129.3 mg/day |
|
| Selenium | 0.8 mg/day | 0.4 mg/day |
|
2.4 mg/day |
|
| Vitamin A | 13609 IU/day | 83541 IU/day |
|
224632 IU/day |
|
| Vitamin D | 2251 IU/day | 9197 IU/day |
|
9555 IU/day |
|
| Vitamin E | 375 IU/day | 94.0 IU/day |
|
99.7 IU/day |
|
A quick look at the two ration options shows how just two ingredients may supply most of the requirements of a mature horse for maintenance. The quantities may be adjusted upward to accommodate increased needs for work, but there may still be deficiencies and imbalances and that's why feed companies pay nutritionists "big money" to solve these problems. Keep in mind that excesses can be a serious problem for some nutrients, so moderation is important.
Buying Feed on Volume Measurements
A practical quiz on your feed buying abilities. As you go into the local feed store or elevator and note that the price of oats posted at $2.20 per bushel and corn at $2.60 per bushel. You immediately decide that oats is the better buy, right?
| OATS | CORN | |
| Cash price per bushel (volume) | $2.20 | $2.60 |
| 1 Bushel weighs | 32 lbs. | 56 lbs. |
| Cost per pound in cents | 6.875 | 4.643 |
| 1 pound yields these calories | 1,300 kcal | 1,540 kcal |
| Kilo Calories purchased for 1 cent | 189.1 | 331.7 |
Who'd a thought it? You get 75% more calories with corn for the same penny. Remember that energy (calorie) costs to support your horse typically run somewhere around 70-80% of your feed budget, so counting calories has more than one meaning in the business. There are three major grains used in horse feeds in the U.S.: oats, corn and barley. Corn has taken a lot of abuse as a horse feed because it is packed with calories, compared to the more fibrous oats, and horse owners typically insist on feeding by volume and not weight. Corn can be safely used and is a great horse feed, if and only if you substitute the calories supplied from oats or barley with corn, CALORIE for CALORIE. If you insist on feeding by scoop or coffee can (imprecise volumes at best), then you're going to dump significantly more energy, nearly twice the calories, into your horse's feed bucket. Colic, founder and excessive weight gains probably will result from this mistake. Make your feed transitions slowly to allow the horse's digestive system time to accommodate the change in your new feed source and there usually shouldn't be any problems. There are a lot of myths associated with grain feeding in horses, and corn has a big share of them. The same basic analysis should be performed on all of your feed sources, in order to get the most value for your dollar. Tougher economic times require the horse owner to look at all of the costs associated with keeping their animals. Don't be afraid to ask questions and examine the ways you've been budgeting your farm's feed expenses. Too often, we spend money by habit, rather than because there is a specific need. A good plan will allow you to reach your goals and still control your costs.
The National Research Council (N.R.C.) has the services of the most respected nutritionists in the U.S on developing equine requirements and feed use. For those interested, the NRC Nutrient Requirements of Horses publication is available from the National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 20418 for about $20. It's a technical publication filled with tables, so it's not something to read for pure enjoyment. It has information on topics of concern to all horse owners and should be a part of your library. For computer users, an accompanying diskette is easy to install and use, offering recommendations for your ration development. The diskette is a little limited in its application, if you plan to mix types of horses in your planning, but it offers you a good starting point. For the computer spreadsheet aficionado, it's a snap to develop a ration calculation template that uses the most common feed and hay products for your area. You can customize it with actual feed evaluation numbers, rather than the estimates, if your feeds are routinely analyzed.
There are two ways to calculate energy requirements, use a calculator /computer and a complicated scientific calculation or use the Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) system. The old worksheet distributed by Purina Mills uses the older and simpler TDN system based on the horse's weight x 0.8 lbs. TDN per 100 lbs. of horse weight as an estimate of energy needs. Based on the assumption that the heavier the horse, the more energy was needed and this system was used for many years. The old TDN rules of thumb generally worked well, but it presumed the energy needs were directly related to weight. In reality, the larger horse's needs are less than projected, because the relationship is not a straight line math function (for example a 1000 lb. horse does not require 10 times the calories of a 100 lb. foal). The more complicated metabolic weight calculation is considered to be more accurate, but it's hard to do in your head. In 1989 the NRC recommended a third and more detailed means of calculations to estimate energy needs, but I still typically use the previous system because I've had good results with it and it works well for me in the field. Energy calculations are only estimates after all, because the individual horse's activities and quirks do affect calorie use and it's impossible to keep a horse in a metabolic crate like many lab animals and still expect them to be athletes.
Disclaimer - The practice of formulating equine rations is a complex one, and you should consult with your professional advisors before making significant changes to your horse rations. This article is not designed to replace competent professional advisors, instead it should be used as a means to encourage owners to ask questions and seek competent advice.
Vaughn W. Henry ©1997, 1999
Henry & Associates
Springfield, Illinois U.S.A.
Telephone: 217.529.1958 Fax: 217.529.1959