Dr. Wiley is most likely abducted and coroner's conclusion is wrong

Part II-A14: "Died accidentally"- The coroner's conclusion on Dr. Wiley's death caused by wrong assumption. Dr. Wiley was most likely abducted and then murdered.

Author: Alan Yu

Justice Department need a reliable and experienced coroner to re-perform the autopsy on Dr. Don Wiley's body to find the truth.

Because Dr. Wiley was most likely abducted by criminals and disappearance five weeks. His body was found five weeks later in in Louisiana's Mississippi river.

Based on Associated Press report on 1/14/2002, Coroner concludes Biologist Died Accidentally: "Medical Examiner O.C. Smith said a number of factors suggest Wiley lost his balance and fell 135 feet into the Mississippi River. Wiley had a seizure disorder that occasionally caused dizziness and had consumed alcohol shortly before his death that could have impaired his judgment or driving, Smith said. Smith said bone fractures indicate Wiley died from injuries sustained when he hit the water at more than 60 mph. "From these injuries, it is reasonable to conclude Dr. Wiley was unconscious, paralyzed and unable to breathe,' Smith said. "He did not drown and there was not pattern of injury suggesting violence'.''

The above conclusion sounds reasonable, but it is simply untrue. Why?

Because the above conclusion based on a wrong assumption that Dr. Don Wiley intended to drive his car to Mississippi river bridge around 3:45 AM in the morning and it headed away his father's home.

Now, I would further explain it with following four points based on facts in the case.

1. Dr. Wiley was driving to his father's home in midnight of November 16 and would not pass Mississippi river bridge.

Because the bridge is not the way to return to his father's home but toward Arkansas.

Based on The Boston Globe report on 12/2/2001, "Although he had a room reserved for him at the hotel, Wiley told his remaining colleagues around midnight he was heading back to his father's house and he would see them the next day."

If the Mississippi Bridge is the way to return his father's home, Dr. Don Wiley's car would drive pass here. However, the bridge is not the way to return to his father's home and would go to Arkansas. According to Associated Press on 11/28/2001, "The Wiley's 85-year-old father, retired chemist Bill Wiley, said his son knew his way around the city from years of visits and attending the hospital meetings."

Since Dr. Don Wiley's car was found on Mississippi bridge toward Arkansas which obviously headed away from his father's home, it had indicated something wrong before his car came to the bridge.

Thus, the problem must had happened before Dr. Wiley's car was driven toward to Mississippi river bridge and headed away his father's home. Because Dr. Wiley was willing to back to his father's home after left the Peabody Hotel and knew the way to his father's home around the city. Obviously, Dr. Wiley would not drive his car to Mississippi bridge because it is the way to Arkansas.

2. The coroner's conclusion can't logically tell that what really happened during the four hours between the time Dr. Wiley left a Memphis hotel and the time his rented car was found on the bridge.

According news report, "The drive from The Peabody to the DeSoto Bridge is about five minutes through the city's well-lighted downtown corridor."
If Dr. Wiley's car were driven by him to here, it would not take four hours. Also, it was midnight, Dr. Wiley was only willing to return to his father's home but not intended to take a trip to Mississippi bridge after already spending four more hours (see details on above news report). So, the coroner's conclusion didn't consider whole facts and Dr. Wiley's intention to back his father's home at that midnight.

3. The coroner's conclusion can't logically tell that why Dr. Wiley would drive his car to Mississippi bridge toward to Arkansas (a wrong way to return his father's home).

Thus, the coroner's conclusion certainly cannot logically explain that why Dr. Wiley's car would drive to the Mississippi river bridge and "hit a construction sign on the Hernando DeSoto Bridge."

Because his car was found on bridge around 3:45 in the morning of November 16 (2001). Thus, if Dr. Wiley drove his car to here by himself, it means that Dr. Wiley already spent four hours after he left Peabody Hotel in midnight and still headed away his father's home. Also, there was no reason to say that Dr. Wiley would drove to Arkansas. Since above action is obviously illogical, it tells that the coroner's conclusion based on wrong assumption.

So, Dr. Wiley's car should not be driven to Mississippi bridge by himself toward Arkansas around 3:40 in the morning. Then, the coroner's conclusion become untrue and is caused by his wrong assumption.

However, if Dr. Don Wiley was abducted by invisible personnel with invisibility technology, his car would be either driven to Mississippi bridge by criminal, or delivered on Mississippi bridge with invisibility technology. Because they tried to mislead publics to mistakenly consider that Dr. Wiley committed suicide from the bridge as other suicidal persons. Also, it can also logically explain that why Dr. Wiley's car took four hours to be found and parked on Mississippi bridge, if the invisible personnel of surveillance station/system abducted Dr. Don Wiley during the four hours.

Thus, he could be abducted by criminals and set up the scene as a suicidal case. Why? Because Wiley is an expert in highly contagious and deadly viruses- "how the human immune system fights off infections and had recently investigated such dangerous viruses as AIDS, Ebola, herpes and influenza."

4. Dr. Wiley didn't drown.

According AP news report, "Smith said bone fractures indicate Wiley died from injuries sustained when he hit the water at more than 60 mph. 'From these injuries, it is reasonable to conclude Dr. Wiley was unconscious, paralyzed and unable to breathe,' Smith said. `He did not drown and there was not pattern of injury suggesting violence'."

Based on Coroner's opinion, although Dr. Wiley did not drown, he concluded he accidentally fell into river because "there was not pattern of injury suggesting violence'.

However, since Dr. Wiley could be abducted by invisible personnel, the violence is totally different. Because invisible personnel can induce death on a person without external injury evidence. For example, they can use radio-frequency weapon to induce heart-attack on a target without external injury evidence (see details on Part II-C2 of my website).

My assumption is described as follow:

If Dr. Wiley was abducted by invisible personnel, they could hide him for weeks. So, Dr. Wiley disappeared over a month. After I openly reported on internet and claimed that Dr. Wiley's disappearance could be abducted by invisible personnel, it attracts public's attention. Thus, invisible personnel could decide to kill Dr. Wiley immediately then threw his body into Mississippi river to avoid public's attention on their activities.

However, they could use radio-frequency to kill Dr. Wiley before threw him into Mississippi river. Thus, Dr. Wiley's body appeared in Mississippi river after he disappeared five weeks. That's why Dr. Wiley didn't drown because he died before falling into river and there was not external injury suggesting violence.

So, the coroner needs to check Dr. Wiley's body to know if he got heart-attack before he fell into Mississippi river. Otherwise, the crime will be covered if Dr. Wiley was abducted by invisible personnel.

According to The Boston Globe on 11/28/2001, 'Don's a chemist, not a biologist; it's absurd to suggest he would know how to grow a virus or help make a biological weapon,' said Matthew Meselson, a professor of molecular biology at Harvard." However, his knowledge on immune system fights infection can still be abused by invisible personnel to increase their illness/death inducing ability and avoid being blocked by their immune system. Furthermore, the invisible personnel are not common terrorists because they can use invisibility technology to steal any bio-weapon from any research institute and then use. So, Dr. Wiley's knowledge is very valuable to them.

For example, according to AP report on 11/21/2001, "The Federation of American Scientists on Wednesday told a 144-nation conference on banning germ warfare that " The anthrax used in letters sent to addresses in NY City, Washington and Florida "was derived, almost certainly, from a U.S. defense laboratory," said Rosenberg." Although our government would not commit this crime, some invisible personnel would know where the anthrax bio-weapon is and steal the anthrax from any research institute; then mailed it to increase public's fears. It can move public's attention on anthrax terrorists from focusing on their own crimes (see details on Part II-C2, C3, C4, D1, D2 of my website). Although anthrax spore could be stolen from military institute by military intelligence units' invisible personnel, their goal is still same because military invisible personnel have cooperated with invisible personnel of law enforcement for several decades. Their common goals are to prevent the invisibility technology and unlawful life control from leaking in order to protect their unlawful power and seek their unlawful interests.

Also, reported cases in Microwave Harassment & Mind Control Experimentation have proven that military grade weapons have been used on American people (those mind control/life control victims). I personally also have experiences of being attacked with sonic weapon, acoustic weapon, laser wagon at my home. How could these military grade weapons be secretly stolen with invisibility technology by invisible personnel to eliminate the civilians?

Because the military invisible personnel will support local involved officers, police of surveillance station/system to eliminate their targets to prevent the invisibility technology and unlawful life control from leaking. Thus, no matter anthrax spore was stolen from an institute of military or civilians, the most likely suspects should be invisible personnel of surveillance station/system. Also, Dr. Don Wiley's disappearance was most likely abducted by invisible personnel with invisibility technology because he had no intention to commit suicide. Also, Beside his family rejected suicidal theory, all his relatives, friends, colleagues do not believe that he would commit suicide.

According to News report, Dr. Wiley left the Peabody Hotel in the midnight of November 15 and his car was found to be abandoned on the Mississippi River bridge four hours later. If Dr. Don Wiley's car parked and abandoned on it by himself, it only need five minutes to drive here from the Peabody Hotel and certainly would not use four hours. Thus, there was four-hours gap and it must happened something on Dr. Wiley during these four hours. So, it caused Dr. Wiley disappearance and his car abandoned on the Mississippi River bridge, when he was supposed to return to his father's home in the midnight of November 15. Thus, the fours hours gap and his car appeared on Mississippi river bridge (which headed away his father's home) both must be the keys in the case. So, above two key points must be investigated to know that (1). What really happened on Dr. Wiley during the four hours. (2). What reason caused Dr. Wiley's car appeared and parked on Mississippi river bridge toward Arkansas. Since Dr. Wiley had no intention to suicide and was driving to his father's home in midnight, he could be abducted with invisibility technology by invisible personnel during the four hours gap. To mislead public that Dr. Wiley's disappearance were to commit suicide, the criminal could further drive Dr. Wiley's car, or use invisibility technology to deliver his car on Mississippi river bridge then parked there.

Thus, the autopsy's result about Dr. Don Wiley's death is very important and concerned by all American people.

Since invisible personnel belong to surveillance station/system which is involved with law enforcement and if the invisible personnel have selected in Memphis to abduct Dr. Don Wiley, it shows that some Memphis' LEO might have involved in the case.

Unfortunately, when protecting unlawful life control a top secret, there is no national border between every country's invisible personnel (see details on Part III-A1 of my website). So, when anything is related with invisibility technology, the involved agents and police (including US University involved police who use invisibility technology) will either cooperate to cover the invisibility technology, or deny the existence of invisibility technology. So, although Harvard spokesman, Joe Wrinn claimed that ''We are very confident that our police department is stressing to Memphis police how important this case is to us,'' it will not change a fact that invisible personnel will be most loyal to criminal life control group. Thus, if Dr. Wiley was abducted by invisible personnel, his death will be either covered as suicide or accidentally death by involved police of surveillance station/system and their associates.

(Source) The Boston Globe on 11/28/2001
==========
Officials at Harvard said detectives from the university's police force are monitoring and assisting the investigation. They said, however, that university administrators have not taken a direct role in prodding federal or local officials to beef up the investigation.

''We are very confident that our police department is stressing to Memphis police how important this case is to us,'' said Joe Wrinn, a Harvard spokesman.

This story ran on page B4 of the Boston Globe on 11/28/2001.
==========

Thus, we must suggest that US Justice Department need to select a reliable coroner to perform the autopsy mission to avoid public's suspicions. Why?

Because Dr. Don Wiley is unlikely to commit suicide and would not drive his car to Mississippi river bridge which is the way to Arkansas but not the way to his father's home. Thus, his disappearance five weeks is most likely that he had been abducted by criminals then disappeared over a month (see details on Part II-A13 of my website). Also, in OKC Bombing case, there was a witness police officer Yeakey who had been murdered to prevent him appearance in trial as a witness. However, local coroner reported that Yeakey committed suicide (see details on Part VIII-C of my main website). So, we do believe that there is blue wall silence existence.

The coroner's main mission in this case is not simply to prove that if the body is Dr. Don Wiley, then simply claim that Dr. Wiley committed suicide, or accident death if the body is Dr. Don Wiley. The above action is irresponsible to be the coroner and law enforcement officers. The most important thing during autopsy is to check that did he die over a month (when Dr. Don Wiley died) and which factor really cause him to die. Why?
Because if Dr. Don Wiley didn't die over a month (on November 16 morning), or he didn't drown, it must be a case of homicide. Also, any conclusion must be wrong if it cannot explain the two key points - (1) what reason caused Dr. Wiley spent four more hours when he was supposed to back his father's home in midnight. (2). What reason caused Dr. Wiley's car to be driven and parked on Mississippi river bridge which is toward Arkansas but not the way to his father's home.

If this is a case of homicide, then Dr. Don Wiley would have been abducted for five weeks by some invisible personnel (who should be the anthrax terrorists).

Who could be the criminals to abduct Dr. Don Wiley with such kinds of methods?

I would deduce that Dr. Don Wiley was most likely abducted by invisible personnel of surveillance station/system. Why?
Because invisibility technology can be used on a target and his car to make them to become invisible and tiny. Thus, the invisible personnel can secretly abduct the target to hide and deliver his car to the Hernando DeSoto Bridge.

Obviously, the ability of invisibility technology and above facts shows that Don Wiley should be abducted in the four hours after he left the restaurant by invisible personnel of surveillance station/system; then the invisible personnel delivered his car on the DeSoto Bridge (with invisibility technology - see details on Part II-A1 of my website).

If the invisible personnel used invisibility technology to abduct Dr. Don Wiley from car, it would not leave sign of struggle in the car. Also, the invisible personnel would not use his credit cards because their goal is to increase their inducing death ability on aware targets - if they can secretly injure a target and avoid being blocked by his immune system.

So, according to The Boston Globe report, "there was no sign of struggle in the car, nor any indication that Wiley's credit cards have been used since last week."

How could the invisible personnel abducted Dr. Don Wiley without encountering resistance? I would explain it with my best knowledge on invisibility technology.

For example, a group of invisible personnel can follow Dr. Don Wiley into his car and stay at passenger seat. When Dr. Don Wiley drove his car at night to a deserted area, two invisible personnel can shut down their generates (which create electromagnetic field to make them invisible). So, these two invisible personnel can back to normal person with their handguns and pretend as the hidden robbers in his car's passenger seat. Thus, the criminals can put their gun on Dr. Don Wiley's head and tell him that he will not be hurt if he listen to them to give up his money and ask him to stop his car in the deserted area. Under such kind of situation, Dr. Don Wiley would consider that if he give up the money that he carries then the robbers would let him go. So he would listen to the criminal to stop his car in the deserted area without any resistance. However, the criminals would further ask Dr. Don Wiley to get off his car after he stop it. The other invisible personnel who are also in the car will then use invisibility technology on Dr. Don Wiley then carry him to the place where they stay. Dr. Don Wiley's car can be either driven to the bridge by other criminal, or use invisibility technology to send it to the bridge.

So, the keys in the ignition should be also intentionally left by invisible personnel to mislead publics to mistakenly consider that this were a suicidal case. So, Dr. Don Wiley disappeared a month. However, after I reported on internet that Dr. Wiley was most likely abducted by anthrax terrorists, Dr. Wiley's body appeared in a week (in Louisiana's Mississippi river- 300 miles from Memphis, Tennessee where he disappeared).

Thus, the coroner must check that did Dr. Don Wiley die over a month (when he died) and what reason caused his death to know the truth. Also, any conclusion must be wrong if it cannot logically explain following two key points.
(1). What reason caused Dr. Wiley to spend four more hours on the road when he was supposed to back his father's home in midnight of November 15, 2001.
(2). What reason caused Dr. Wiley's car to appear on Mississippi river bridge which is the way toward Arkansas but not the way to his father's home.

Why would invisible personnel abduct Dr. Don Wiley at this time?

I have reported on internet that the anthrax mails terrorists are most likely caused by invisible personnel of surveillance station/system to increase public's fears in order to move public's attention on terrorists from focusing on their own crimes (see details on Part II-A12 of my website).

The current abuse of invisibility technology is like using drugs; it easily robs a person's dignity, character and morals. Why? I would explain it in details. Everyone knows that drugs will adversely affect a person's health, but some people still use them. These people are either trying to get a high to feel better, or they are just trying to escape reality because they can't handle their problems. The invisible personnel who abuse these technologies are addicted to using these technologies like drug addicts are addicted to drugs. Some invisible personnel are addicted to these technologies because it allows them to gain knowledge about other people's secrets and private activities (in order to protect their own interests), while other invisible personnel cannot handle their problems in society and want to escape the law to induce illness/death on others who know their crimes and secrets, or who have become a witness to oppose their interests (see details on Part II-C4 of my website) and whom they dislike (see details Part II-C2, C3 of my website).

Thus, when abusing invisibility technology, most invisible personnel act as drug addicts who have lost their dignity, character, and morals to seek their personal interests,; or who cannot handle their problems in society to escape the law then induce illness/death on American people whom they dislike.

I have stated that if anthrax attacks keep sending through new mails, the invisible personnel must can find out and capture the anthrax terrorists. Otherwise, the invisible personnel become the most likely suspects because they can secretly enter anyone's home, vehicle, etc. to monitor one's activities.

Thus, if the anthrax attack through mails keep sending from new mails (e.g., after December 1), the anthrax terrorists must can be found and captured no matter who are the anthrax terrorists.

After I report above facts on internet, the anthrax attacks through new mails have stopped. However, it also appears that invisible personnel are the most likely suspects since they cannot find and capture the anthrax terrorists.
.
So, the invisible personnel could abduct Dr. Don Wiley to know that what kind of bio-weapon can be used by them and learn his knowledge to increase their inducing illness/death ability on aware targets then cause his disappearance.

Where are the invisible personnel from?
According to an inside information from Taiwan former President Chiang Kai-Shek, invisibility technology tested in Philadelphia Experiment has been developed successfully to use on human by US Navy after WWII. In 1950s, this invisibility technology has been transferred to Taiwan surveillance system for surveillance purpose and unlawful life control. After using invisibility technology, the personnel & equipment become invisible, tiny (like small ant size) and can levitate (floating in the air as weightless condition). Thus, by wearing a propulsion device on back, every invisible personnel can fly/move as if a flying ant -carried equipment such as weapons & mind machine ((But so far, they still cannot explain why humans become tiny in the invisible electromagnetic field).

These invisible personnel's codename was "little spirits" in 1960s and changed to "bees" to prevent security leaking. That's because most of westerns know that "little spirits from Pandora are invisible, very small/tiny and would spread illness/death on man.

By using invisible personnel, illness/death inducing techniques combined with materialism, atheism, Chiang Ching-Kuo established an unlawful life control surveillance system in Taiwan. Chiang Ching-Kuo could establish the criminal life control system not only because he controlled all intelligence Agencies & surveillance system, but also because he was a communist (when he was in the Soviet Union). Since their chief goal was to hasten Chiang Ching-Kuo's rise-to-power, Taiwan invisible personnel kept all important persons (including President Chiang Kai-Shek to civilians) under surveillance and unlawful life
control. They have also secretly induced illness/death on some victims who opposed Chiang Ching-Kuo to inherit Chiang Kai-Shek's Presidency from victims' homes/offices, cars, etc. (e.g. Chiang Kai-Shek's vice President Chang Chen -see details on Part II-F1 of my webpage).

In 1960s, they also use inducing illness techniques to injure President Chiang Kai-Shek's knee (using acupuncture medical knowledge). It caused that Chiang Kai-Shek could not stand and walk long time. This allowed Chiang Ching-Kuo to obtain more power from his father and represented him to inspect the troop.

Also, when seeking a special interests, they even eliminate a loyal deputy to achieve it. For example, Taiwan invisible personnel induced cerebral hemorrhage on Premier Yun-Chuan Sun (who was a loyal deputy of Chiang Ching-Kuo) in 1984. (see details on Part II-F1 of my website). Chiang Ching-Kuo also kept the invisibility technology and unlawful life control a top secret without his brother's (Chiang Wei-kuo) knowledge. Thus, Chiang Wei-Kuo ultimately became a victim of invisible personnel. In early 1990s, Taiwan invisible personnel used stun gun to induce Chiang Wei-Kuo to have bad knee
as his father and induced his heart's capillaries to burst in 1996 (see details on Part II-A of my website). After Taiwan government allowed Taiwan's citizens to travel in Mainland, Taiwan's invisible personnel have been arranged to enter Mainland (vice versa). Their goal is to secretly cooperate for unlawful life control.

Why can this kind of secret life control cooperation could be achieved?
Because they have already secretly cooperated in the US for decades to carry out life control operations under the US invisible personnel's arrangement. This kind of secret cooperation with foreign invisible personnel on unlawful life control are mostly under US local police chief's arrangement or supervision. Because local police have used invisibility technology, mind control device and psy (nonlethal) weapons. So, local police station is mind control basic unit and involved police secretly use illness/death inducing techniques to unlawfully control local Americans' lives (Under such kind of circumstance, local police station become the intelligence information secret exchange center of foreign invisible personnel). The secret cooperation of Taiwan and China's invisible personnel in China also led Chiang Ching-Kuo's illegitimate son Xiao-Ci Zhang to be murdered with cerebral hemorrhage inducing technique by Taiwan's invisible personnel in 11/14/1994 during he visited Beijing, China for academic exchange. Why? Xiao-Ci Zhang's mother was Ya-Ruo Zhang who was Chiang Ching-Kuo's girl friend from late 1930s-1941. After she had twins sons with Chiang Ching-Kuo, she was murdered and buried in Gre-Lin, Guang-Xi Province. In 1949, Chiang Ching-Kuo's illegitimate twins sons and their maternal grandmother were sent to Taiwan to live. In November/1993, one of Chiang ching-Kuo's illegitimate twins sons, Dr. Xiao-Ci Zhang visited his mother's tomb in Gre-Lin after he was invited to China for academic exchange. He was told about his mother's murder then vowed to expose the truth. However, Taiwan's invisible personnel suddenly induced him to have cerebral hemorrhage on 11/14/1994 during he was invited to Beijing University for academic exchange. Dr. Xiao-Ci Zhang appears to be a thin person. Such kind of person should have no serious problem on blood vessel and has remote chance to get a stroke. Also, he didn't have warning signs of stroke and was only 53 years old when he died of cerebral hemorrhage. It proves that his cerebral hemorrhage must have been induced by Taiwan's invisible personnel (see details on Part II-C3, or Part V-B2 of my website) with stun stick/baton (or stun gun). The above facts prove that the unlawful life control surveillance system is mainly used to seek unlawful interests and power for invisible personnel and their real head (who use invisibility technology). It is not used for the national interests. Many countries had established similar type of surveillance system (including United States) after share the invisibility technology & illness/death inducing techniques.. Furthermore, invisible personnel cooperate with foreign countries' surveillance system personnel to protect their common interests. Based on Taiwan's examples, invisible personnel have no moral, ethics and can induce illness/death on their parents & blood relative. Since they can easily betray their blood relatives, they certainly will betray their own country to pursue unlawful interests. Taiwan's examples prove that Taiwan's invisible personnel not only secretly cooperate with US invisible personnel for unlawful life control, but they also secretly cooperate with China's invisible personnel for unlawful life control. That's why there is "no national
border" between invisible personnel of every country (see details on Part III-A1). It means that any country's involved agents and police of surveillance station/system could also use invisibility technology and illness/death inducing techniques to secretly eliminate anyone (even betray their own country's interests) to seek unlawful interests and power (see reported cases on Part III-A1 of my website).

The following messages of Col. John Alexander also prove that invisibility technology has been used by these so-called nonlethal weapons users to secretly deliver "microwave voice" and use microwave (or Radio wave) weapon on American people without being seen by victims.

"In a notorious 1980 article, 'The New Mental Battlefield' in MILITARY REVIEW (an US Army journal), John Alexander also stated that "The use of psychotronic weapons .. would be able to induce illness or death at little or no risk to the operator. The psychotronic weapon would be silent, difficult to detect and would require only a human operator as a power source." (see details on "The New Mental Battlefield" by John B. Alexander, MILITARY REVIEW, English Ed, Dec. 1980). Why would these psychotronic weapons only need a human operator as a power source? To prevent the secret technology of surveillance system from public's knowing, Col. Alexander didn't explain it in details. So, I will explain it later.

The above messages proves that when using these weapons, the human operators must need in scene to power the weapon as power source. Thus, when the victims heard "microwave voices", or are attacked by so-called nonlethal weapons (e.g. microwave weapon, infrasound weapon, radio-frequency weapon), there must be some human operators ("at crime scene") around the victims to power their microwave voice device and weapons. However, according to victims' reports (see details on following source), all victims who complained of being "zapped by radio waves" or heard "voices" never saw anybody use microwave voice device, or weapons against them where they were victimized.

(Source) "Microwave Harassment & Mind Control Experimentation" by Julianne McKinney, Dec. 1992
==========
When elderly parents and young children in the family become targets for apparent purposes of intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our cases, to date.

Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an employee of a local power company that, if she valued the lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition to the company's installation of high power lines. Since receiving that threat, the individual's 11-year-old daughter has been reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot be diagnosed. It is also apparent to this individual that her three-year-old son is on the receiving end of externally-induced auditory [microwave voices - Alan Yu note] input.

FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from "mentally disturbed persons" who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves" and/or "are hearing voices..."

"* Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene. The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual's complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a "fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment."
==========

Why the above victims didn't see any human operator who used microwave (or radio-frequency) weapon to zap them, or used microwave voice device to deliver voice to them (then cause them hearing voices)?

Because these human operators and weapons have used invisibility technology to become invisible and tiny. Thus, although many victims had been attacked by these weapons, they could not see these invisible personnel and their weapons. Thus, combined with John Alexander's messages and these victims' experiences, it does proves that invisibility technology has been used by local law enforcement officers (involved FBI & police of local surveillance station/system) and their recruited operatives to make them and their weapons become invisible. Thus, those personnel can use their weapons (or microwave voice device) on their targets without being seen by these targets. The above facts prove that invisibility technology has been used in US surveillance station/system and used by involved local law enforcement officers. However, to prevent the invisibility technology from leaking to society, these victims had been falsely accused as mentally disturbed (see details on above source). Based on MICROWAVE NEWS Nov/Dec 1993 reported, state and local law enforcement have used nonlethal weapons (e.g. infrasound microwave weapon, radio-frequency, etc.) and mind control equipment (see details on Part IV-A3 of my website). Thus, the above victims didn't get help from police and FBI because their harassment could be caused by some of involved local FBI agents and involved police of surveillance station/system (including involved police of University).

The following information confirm that John Alexander developed technologies (including mind reading technology and nonlethal weapons) for invisible personnel/invisible warriors (please see details on Part IV-A3 of my website).

(Source) "Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons" by David G. Guyatt, Prepared for the 1996 International Red Cross Symposium: The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons (3/8/96)
==========
Alexander wrote a book an article (and later co-authored a book entitled The Warrior's Edge) published in Military Review in which he outlined a number of hitherto "fringe" subjects --including telepathy - - that should be brought in to the battery of future weapons. Alexander is dedicated to the development of a super-human soldier with enhanced abilities leading to an "invisible warrior."
==========

The above information not only prove that the conclusion is true that nonlethal weapons users have used invisibility technology, but it also support that the inside information from Taiwan (that invisible personnel hijack everyone's life with illness/death inducing techniques) is completely true.

Also, the above information also proves that US invisible personnel/invisible warriors have used advanced technology (e.g. mind machine and new weapons so-called nonlethal weapon ) in surveillance system to mind control or unlawfully induce illness/death on their targets (The evidences of using invisibility technology in US by involved officers and police of surveillance station/system- please see details on Part II-A1 of my website).

Now, I want to explain that why the silent, lethal psychotronic weapon would require only a human operator as a power source.

According to an article, "The Mind Has No Firewall" by Timothy L. Thomas, PARAMETERS, US Army War College Quarterly, Spring 1998, Vol. XXVIII, No. 1: " A psychotronic generator, which produces a powerful electromagnetic emanation capable of being sent through telephone lines, TV, radio networks, supply pipes, and incandescent lamps."

The technology of the psychotronic generator must be similar to power beaming system which is used to activate and power remote device (emitters).

(Source) ANGELS DON'T PLAY THIS HAARP by Dr. Nick Begich & Jeane Manning, 1995
===========
There is a description of the patent of "power beaming system." US Patent
Number: 5,068,669

According to this patent, the present invention relates in general to the transfer of energy by means of electromagnetic waves to power a remote device. This idea is to convert microwaves to DC power, which can be done very efficiently and cost effectively with the right kind of transmission system capable of focusing the power into a narrow beam.
===========

Using technology like power beaming system (e.g. a psychotronic generation), invisible personnel can activate & power concealed devices installed in people's residences (or vehicles, boats, buildings, etc.) within a short distances of invisible personnel.

It means that in current society, many hidden emitters already exist in citizens' homes/workplaces, vehicles, or public buildings, banks, shopping center, business stores, etc. These electronic and radiation hidden emitters (psychotronic weapon) are in household appliances (e.g. monitor, TV, radio networks, microwave oven, incandescent lamps), telephone lines, supply pipes, light poles, lawnmowers, cars, boats, planes, etc. .

Thus, there are always psychotronic weapons surrounding a citizen, no matter where the citizen is. Thus, if they want to attack a target, it only needs an operator who use a psychotronic generator (as power source) to power the hidden emitters (psychotronic weapons) and attack the target from the target's home/workplace, vehicle, or from a bank, shopping center, light poles, etc. Who can use a psychotronic generator to power these weapons to attack a target at his home/workplace, vehicle, etc. without the victim's knowledge? The answer is that only the invisible personnel can.

For example, the invisible personnel can use the psychotronic generator to produces a powerful electromagnetic emanation (or radio waves) to attack a target at his home through TV, monitor, microwave oven, telephone lines, supply pipes, and lawnmower in his yard. Thus, the target would "zapped by radio-waves" but didn't see anyone use the weapon on him. Because to prevent the attack from victim's knowing, the operator (who carry a psychotronic generator as power source) has used the invisibility technology to become invisible and tiny (as small ant or small mosquito).

Under such kind of circumstance, Americans are under unlawful life control by nonlethal (psy) weapons users (involved agents, police & recruited operatives) with invisibility technology and illness/death inducing techniques.

According to Taiwan inside information about invisible personnel, beside they can use mind control technology and induce illness/death on their targets, they can use invisibility technology to steal document, cash, (see details on Part II-A6 of my website), ballots (see details on Part II-A7 of my website), create the appearance of UFO, and abduct a targeted person from his home, vehicle, etc. The following information tells that Col. Alexander involved in the technical capability to create the effects of abduction. Invisibility technology can be used to create the appearance of UFO because the personnel and equipment can levitate after enter invisible electromagnetic field.

(Source) "New World Order & E.L.F. Psychotronic Tyranny" by C. B. Baker, YOUTH ACTION NEWSLETTER, Dec. 1994.
==========
The Federal Government has acquired enough high tech psychotronic devices.. .
Many of non-lethal weapons projects, in which Col. Alexander is involved, have the technical capability to create the effects of ARTIFICIAL UFO abductions, via holography and electromagnetic mind control techniques.
==========

To prove the abduction of above source is true technology of involved agents and police of surveillance station/system with invisibility technology, I would mention an old news.

The news report shows that since 1943, Navy used invisibility technology on two of drunk sailors in Tavern Brawl to make them disappear (invisible and tiny then brought them away). This news roves that using invisibility technology on a targeted person, invisible personnel can abduct a person from his home/office, vehicle, etc.

According to the information from The Philadelphia Experiment and Ascension, there was a regional Philadelphia newspaper article from October 1943 entitled "Strange Circumstances Surround Tavern Brawl." The article reads as follows:

"Several city police officers responding to a call to aid members of the Navy Shore Patrol in breaking up a tavern brawl near the U.S. Navy docks here last night got something of a surprise when they arrived on the scene to find the place empty of customers. According to a pair of very nervous waitresses, the Shore Patrol had arrived first and cleared the place out - but not before two of the sailors involved allegedly did a disappearing act. "They just sort of vanished into thin air… right there," reported one of the frightened hostesses, "and I am't been drinking either!" At that point, according to her account, the Shore Patrol proceeded to hustle everyone out of the place in short order.

A subsequent chat with the local police precinct left no doubts as to the fact that some sort of general brawl had indeed occurred in the vicinity of the dockyards at about eleven o' clock last night, but neither confirmation nor denial of the stranger aspects of the story could be immediately obtained."

Based on a pair of very nervous eye-witnesses waitresses, the Shore Patrol had arrived first and cleared the place out - after two of the sailors involved allegedly did a disappearing act." Also, one of the frightened hostesses reported: They just sort of vanished into thin air right there, and I am't been drinking either!" The vanished event must be true because the above two eye-witnesses witnesses saw the same thing and then reported it to the city police officers who arrived then interviewed the eye-witnesses. Thus, the two sailors' disappearance event in the Tavern must be true. Because telling such kind of event would easily cause problem to these eye-witnesses if their story were lies. Also, telling the two sailors disappearance in the Tavern didn't benefit these two waitresses. So, these two eye-witnesses waitresses must have told the truth. Also, the police also confirm that general brawl had indeed occurred in the Tavern. How could the two of sailors suddenly "vanished into air"? I would explain it in details.
According to information on Philadelphia Experiment, Navy had made the successful trial which occurred on 10/28/1943. The above brawl also happened on October 1943, it shows that the two of sailors must be in the crew of the warship which took part in the Philadelphia Experiment. To prevent the invisibility technology testing on the warship being interfered and security leaking, other involved Navy researchers/invisible personnel must carried generator and used invisibility technology on these two of sailors (who involved in the Tavern Brawl) in order to abduct/carry them back to their warship. Thus, after using invisibility technology on the two of sailors, it caused them to become invisible and tiny in the Tavern. However, under such kind of circumstance, unknowing persons (e.g. the waitresses and hostess) in scene would only see that the two sailors vanished into air. Thus , this News prove that since 1943, US Navy used invisibility technology on their two sailors in a Tavern of Philadelphia. This made them becoming invisible, tiny then Navy invisible personnel brought them out the Tavern. However, after using invisibility technology on these two sailors, on surface, they appeared as "vanished into air" to unknowing person in scene. This event also prove that inside information from Taiwan is true that this technology can be used to abduct their target on target's home/workplace, vehicle, etc.

The above situation obviously is not as same as the reported movies of Philadelphia Experiment in cable TV History channel- The movies shows that the sailors repeatedly disappeared (become invisible) and re-appeared (become visible), then finally disappeared/become invisible- It can easily mislead the public that after using invisibility technology, the two sailors become invisible but still keep normal human size in the invisible electromagnetic field. So, the TV movies of Philadelphia Experiment is most likely used to mislead the public as brain washing tactic of CIA. It tells a few un-important true information and combined with many misleading information to spread the perception that the invisibility technology was a failed experiment, or to spread the doubt that the technology could possibly be used on people. For example, in the TV movies of Philadelphia Experiment, it shows a sailor were alive after re-materialized his body with the ship. This information not only used to mislead people, but it also intentionally create fears to the public to stop further investigation. Because human cannot be alive after de-materialization. Also, there is no way to claim that human's blood, muscle can be re-materialized with a ship's steel then appear as normal human after his part of body connect with the ship (see more explanation on following de-materialization). Obviously, we cannot accept such kind of big lies.

To prevent the secret of tiny invisible personnel from knowing by others, some experimental subjects claimed that they had experiences of de-materialization, or time travel in the Philadelphia Experimentation. However, de-materialization and time travel obviously become two misleading theories to cover the facts that these experimental subjects become invisible and disappeared from view. Why? I would explain it.

First, de-materialization did not occur in the Philadelphia Experiment.
It might be possible to de-materialize and then re-materialize non-living objects like a ship, but if a living being like a sailor was de-materialized along with the ship, the sailor would be dead the instant it happens. Thus, the theory concerning the Philadelphia Experiment which says both the ship and its crew de-materialized and later re-materialized, with the crew still alive, is obviously not possible. This is very basic logic.

Second, neither did time travel occur in the Philadelphia Experiment.
In the successful trial which occurred on October 28, 1943, the ship and its personnel actually became invisible and undertook interdimensional travel from one point on Earth to another (from Philadelphia harbor to Norfolk port in Virginia) in a few seconds. They went neither to the past nor to the future (see details on Part II-B1 of my website).

Why did some experimental subjects use de-materialization and time travel to mislead the public? Because many scientists and researchers took part in the Philadelphia Experiment during WWII. Thus, many scientists and researchers knew about that these experimental subjects had become invisible and disappeared from view during the Experiment. Since they could not simply deny the above facts, some experimental subjects used dematerialization and time travel to explain that why they became to disappear from view during the Philadelphia Experiment.

Since de-materialization and time travel didn't occur, the misleading explanations do revealed that these experimental subjects had become invisible. So, it caused them to disappear from view at scene. Beside some personnel ran into problems during the Philadelphia Experiment, most of them (e.g. Mr. Duncan Cameron, Jr.) had been recovered after medical care for a period of time (see details on Part II-B2 of my website). Thus, invisibility technology of Philadelphia experiment had been successfully demonstrated to use on human being in 1943. It proves that after continuously developing to solve the problems, invisibility technology can be fully used on human being (see details on Part II-B2 of my website). This confirmed that inside information from Taiwan is true that invisibility technology has been developed successfully to use on human being after WWII.

Thus, this News prove that since 1943, US Navy used invisibility technology on their sailors to become invisible and tiny then brought them away. However, after using invisibility technology on the two sailors, on surface, they appear as "vanished into air" to unknowing person in scene. The event also proves that by using invisibility technology on their targeted person, invisible personnel can abduct a person in victim's home/office, vehicle, etc. Thus, it also confirm the source must be true that "Col. John Alexander involved in ARTIFICIAL UFO abductions, via holography and electromagnetic mind control techniques." Because Col. Alexander is involved to develop advanced technology for invisible warrior/invisible personnel.

To prove that the invisible personnel can steal cash, document and bio-weapon from any hidden place (a privacy home or an institute), I would use following three examples to further clarify it.

First example, there was a case which had been reported in "Microwave Harassment & Mind Control Experimentation" by Julianne McKinney (December 1992).

It states: "In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of money has been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment, within hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank. There was no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the preferred objects of theft, when theft occur.)"
Alan Yu note: This case must be true because the victim's bank can show the record and prove to police that a tremendous amount of money had been withdrawn by the victim within a hour. So, how could anyone cause the large amount money (in hidden place) to suddenly disappear in the victim's home
without leaving any signs of entry into her apartment? This crime could not be committed by common thief? Why?

(1). Because a thief could not know that there was a tremendous amount of money which had been withdrawn from bank to home by the victim. (2). The thief could not know that where the tremendous amount of money was in the victim's home because the victim put it in a hidden place. (3). A common thief could not so quickly to have knowledge on above two points and then entered her apartment to steal large amount of money from a hidden place within a hour and without leaving signs of entry into the victim's apartment.

Thus, it must be caused by local invisible personnel of surveillance station/system. Also, the invisible personnel's work must be related with bank. Why? Because by using invisibility technology, the invisible personnel can make the money to become invisible and tiny then take the target's money away without leaving any trace evidence. Furthermore, only an invisible personnel whose work related with bank could have prior knowledge about that a customer would withdraw a tremendous of money from bank lately. If a customer didn't notify a bank in advanced that he would withdraw a tremendous amount of money from bank in which date, a bank would not allow the customer to suddenly withdraw a large amount of cash. To prevent invisibility technology being exposed, invisible personnel usually will not steal any target's money. However, when an under surveillance target shows a tremendous amount of money (cash) at home, some invisible personnel will take risk to steal it with invisibility technology. Another case happened in Taipei, Taiwan in 2000. According to World Journal (Chinese Newspaper published in NY) report, a accountant (CPA in Taiwan) withdrew cash $10,000,000 (NT, it equals US dollar $300,000-Thirty hundred thousand dollar) to his home in Taipei and put money in the security lock at home.

Beside himself, no one else had the key of the security lock However, the whole cash suddenly disappeared after he left home then returned within a hour. The News reported that no signs show that there was other person to enter his home and the cash never can be found by police.

The above two cases show that the local invisible personnel of surveillance station/system had monitored above persons for some time. They used invisibility technology to steal these victims' money after these victims left large amount of cash at home and went out for a short period of time. Since invisibility technology is a top secret of involved officers and police of surveillance station/system, unknowing victims will never know that who stole their money.

Second example, by using invisibility technology, invisible personnel can abduct person anywhere. According to two eye-witnesses' report, the invisibility technology had been successfully used in a Philadelphia Tavern to bring two drunken sailors (who had been involved in a brawl with other customers) out of the tavern in 1943. This event proves that invisibility technology has been developed to use on human and can also be used to abduct their targets from the targets' homes/workplaces, vehicles, etc.

On October 1943, a region Philadelphia Newspaper had ever reported that two sailors just sort of vanished into thin air during a tavern brawl. It proves that inside information from Taiwan is true.

According to the information from _The Philadelphia Experiment and Ascension, there was a regional Philadelphia newspaper article from October 1943 entitled "Strange Circumstances Surround Tavern Brawl." The article stated as follows:

"Several city police officers responding to a call to aid members of the Navy Shore Patrol in breaking up a tavern brawl near the U.S. Navy docks here last night

got something of a surprise when they arrived on the scene to find the place empty of customers. According to a pair of very nervous waitresses, the Shore Patrol had arrived first and cleared the place out - but not before two of the sailors involved allegedly did a disappearing act. "They just sort of vanished into thin air right there," reported one of the frightened hostesses, "and I am't been drinking either!"

At that point, according to her account, the Shore Patrol proceeded to hustle everyone out of the place in short order. A subsequent chat with the local police precinct left no doubts as to the fact that some sort of general brawl had indeed occurred in the vicinity of the dockyards at about eleven o' clock last night, but neither confirmation nor denial of the stranger aspects of the story could be immediately obtained" (see details on Part II-B2 of my website).

According to a pair of very nervous eye-witnesses waitresses, the Shore Patrol had arrived first and cleared the place out - after two of the sailors involved allegedly did a disappearing act." Also, one of the frightened hostesses reported: They just sort of vanished into thin air right there, and I am't been drinking either!"

The vanished event must be true because the above two eye-witnesses witnesses saw the same thing and then reported it to the city police officers who arrived then interviewed the eye-witnesses. Thus, the two sailors' disappearance event in the Tavern must be true. Because telling such kind of event would easily cause problem to these eye-witnesses if their story were lies. Also, telling the two sailors disappearance in the Tavern didn't benefit these two waitresses. So, these two eye-witnesses waitresses must have told the truth. Also, the police also confirm that general brawl had indeed occurred in the Tavern. How could the two of sailors suddenly "vanished into air"? I would explain it in details.

According to information on Philadelphia Experiment, Navy had made the successful trial which occurred on 10/28/1943. The above brawl also happened on October 1943, it shows that the two of sailors must be in the crew of the warship which took part in the Philadelphia Experiment. To prevent the invisibility technology testing on the warship being interfered and security leaking, other involved Navy researchers/invisible personnel must carried generator and used invisibility technology on these two of sailors (who involved in the Tavern Brawl) in order to abduct/carry them back to their warship. Thus, after using invisibility technology on the two of sailors, it caused them to become invisible and tiny in the Tavern. However, under such kind of circumstance, unknowing persons (e.g., the eye-witnesses/waitresses) in scene would only see that the two sailors vanished into air. Thus , this News prove that since 1943, US Navy used invisibility technology on their two sailors in a Tavern of Philadelphia. This made them becoming invisible, tiny then Navy invisible personnel brought them out the Tavern.

However, after using invisibility technology on these two sailors, it appears as "vanished into air" to unknowing person in scene. This event also prove that inside information from Taiwan is true that this technology can be used to abduct their target on target's home/workplace, vehicle, etc.

First, de-materialization did not occur in the Philadelphia Experiment. It might be possible to de-materialize and then re-materialize non-living objects like a ship, but if a living being like a sailor was de-materialized along with the ship, the sailor would be dead the instant it happens. Thus, the theory concerning the Philadelphia Experiment which says both the ship and its crew de-materialized and later re-materialized, with the crew still alive, is obviously not possible. This is very basic logic.

Since de-materialization and time travel didn't occur, the misleading explanations do revealed that these experimental subjects had become invisible and tiny. So, it not only caused them to disappear from view at scene, but also caused them becoming tiny. That's why they use de-materialization to explain the tiny situation to these sailors in Philadelphia Experiment.

Beside some personnel ran into problems during the Philadelphia Experiment, most of them (e.g. Mr. Duncan Cameron, Jr.) had been recovered after medical care for a period of time (see details on Part II-B2 of my website). Thus, invisibility technology of Philadelphia experiment had been successfully demonstrated to use on human being in 1943. It proves that after continuously developing to solve the problems, invisibility technology can be fully used on human being (see details on Part II-B2 of my website). This confirmed that inside information from Taiwan is true that invisibility technology has been developed successfully to use on human being after WWII.

Third example, now, I would use some victims' reports to further prove that after using invisibility technology, the personnel, equipment and their weapons will become invisible and tiny.

Based on victims' reports, some victims have the experiences of losing some of their teeth due to attacks by invisible personnel. However, under normal situation, infrasound weapon cannot be used to attack a target with extremely narrow beam. But the facts is that when a victim's tooth is attacked, the infrasound will not attack the victim's whole mouth teeth, or damage another tooth which is either on the left, or right side of the targeted tooth.

Why such kind of crime can be committed without most victims' knowledge and why infrasound waves can become so narrow beam on surface. The reality is that these criminals and their weapons are invisible and tiny as small ants (or mosquitoes) after using invisibility technology. Thus, the tiny invisible personnel can use tiny infrasound weapon which infrasound waves will appear as extreme narrow beam to normal size human (comparing with normal person's size) and attack the targeted tooth of normal human on his gum from his above, or lower lip. Under such kind of situation. the infrasound wave certainly will only attack the targeted tooth (and another side tooth where the infrasound exit). It will neither attack the victim's whole mouth teeth, nor attack the tooth on the left (or right) side of targeted tooth (see other techniques in details on Part V-C of my website)

Now, I would further explain it in details.
The tiny invisible personnel (who enter people's home and keep the victim under close surveillance & control) can loosen the victim's teeth while he is sleeping by gently landing on the area between the victim's upper lip and nose and attacking his gums with infrasound weapon. The goal is to cause the unknowing victim to lose his/her teeth as if the result of natural cause. By using infrasound to attack the gums of the teeth, the invisible personnel can loosen the victim's teeth and cause them drop out. This kind of tooth loss will be different from natural tooth loss.

Natural tooth loss will always have cavity on the tooth and will usually occur individually. However, there is no cavity on the teeth loosened by tiny invisible personnel (with infrasound). This kind of tooth loss will also cause at least two teeth to loosen or fall out. That's because the infrasound attacks a target's teeth by entering through one side of the mouth and exiting at the other side. Therefore, it will not only damage the targeted tooth (or teeth), but it will also damage teeth on the side of the mouth where the infrasound exits. Beside other victims' reports, I personally have same experiences of such kinds of losing teeth by tiny invisible personnel. It is their tactic to damage one's health and make a target's life more difficult. Also, to stop me exposing their crimes on internet, sometime, the tiny invisible personnel would secretly stay on my eye-lash and attack my eyes with microwave weapon in order to blind me.

The above facts prove that after using invisibility technology, the personnel, equipment and their weapons will become invisible and tiny (as the size of small ants, or small mosquitoes). Also, the above facts prove that the invisible personnel can use invisibility technology to steal other's document, cash, or bio-weapon etc. and even abduct a person. Because they can easily take the targeted object away, and even abduct a person, after using invisibility technology on a targeted person, or on other's document, money, and bio-weapon, etc. to become invisible and tiny.

Thus, the invisible personnel even didn't develop any bio-weapon but they can still can use invisibility technology to obtain (steal) and then use any bio-weapon. So, what they really need is the expert's knowledge - what kind of bio-weapon is more deadly, or available and easily used or where they can easily steal bio-weapon from without attracting owner's attention!

Also, Dr. Wiley's knowledge on immune system fights infection can still be abused by invisible personnel to increase their illness/death inducing ability and avoid being blocked by immune system. Thus, invisible personnel are uncommon terrorists if anthrax mails are sent by them. So, Dr. Wiley's expertise is very valuable to them since the invisible personnel can steal any of bio-weapon from others.

In recent anthrax mails cases in US, although anthrax spore could be stolen from military institute by military intelligence units' invisible personnel, their goal is still same because military invisible personnel have cooperated with invisible personnel of law enforcement for several decades. Their common goals are to prevent the invisibility technology and unlawful life control from leaking in order to protect their unlawful power and seek their unlawful interests. For example, reported cases in Microwave Harassment & Mind Control Experimentation have proven that military grade weapons have been used on American people (those mind control/life control victims). I personally also have experiences of being attacked with sonic weapon, acoustic weapon, laser wagon at my home. How could these military grade weapons be secretly stolen with invisibility technology by invisible personnel to eliminate the civilians?

Because the military invisible personnel will support local involved officers, police of surveillance station/system to eliminate their targets to prevent the invisibility technology and unlawful life control from leaking. Thus, no matter anthrax spore was stolen from an institute of military or civilians, the most likely suspects should be invisible personnel of surveillance station/system. Also, Dr. Don Wiley's disappearance was most likely caused (abducted) by invisible personnel (see more details information on Part II-A13 of my website).

(Source) Associated Press on Monday January 14 5:47 PM ET
==========
Coroner: Biologist Died Accidentally

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) - A Harvard biologist who vanished last November died in an accidental fall from a Memphis bridge as he checked out his damaged rental car, the medical examiner said Monday.

Don C. Wiley's disappearance had sparked speculation that he might have been the target of terrorists because of his research on a number of potentially deadly viruses, including Ebola.

But Medical Examiner O.C. Smith said a number of factors suggest Wiley lost his balance and fell 135 feet into the Mississippi River.

Wiley had a seizure disorder that occasionally caused dizziness and had consumed alcohol shortly before his death that could have impaired his judgment or driving, Smith said.

The medical examiner said yellow paint marks on Wiley's car suggest he hit a construction sign on the Hernando DeSoto Bridge early on Nov. 16. The hub cap also was missing from the right front tire.

Traffic on the bridge had been reduced to two lanes because of the construction. Smith said heavy truck traffic on the bridge often sets off wind gusts and ``roadway bounce'' that might have caused Wiley to lose his balance after stepping out of the car. A bridge railing would have only come up to mid-thigh on the 6-foot-3 Wiley.

``If Dr. Wiley were on the curb trying to assess damage to his car, all of these factors may have played a role in his going over the rail,'' Smith said.

Wiley's body was discovered in the river Dec. 20 near Vidalia, La., about 300 miles south of Memphis.

Smith said bone fractures indicate Wiley died from injuries sustained when he hit the water at more than 60 mph.

"From these injuries, it is reasonable to conclude Dr. Wiley was unconscious, paralyzed and unable to breathe," Smith said. "He did not drown and there was not pattern of injury suggesting violence."

Wiley, 57, was a professor of biochemistry and biophysics in Harvard University's molecular and cellular biology department. He and another Harvard professor won honors for their work on how the human immune system works, including the Japan Prize in 1999.

Wiley was in Memphis for a scientific conference. He was last seen about midnight Nov. 15 at a conference banquet at a downtown hotel and colleagues said he did not appear distressed or intoxicated.

His car was found four hours later abandoned on the bridge with the keys in the ignition and a full gas tank.

Authorities initially thought the father of four committed suicide, but Smith said he ruled out the possibility. Police said Wiley had no known financial or domestic problems.
==========