What would those invisible personnel have done during the debates to damage Bush's Presidential campaign?

On September 30, 2004, President Bush lost first debate to Senator Kerry. This result had changed the election polls in entire nation. Before the first debate, Bush led Kerry 6-8 points in every poll. After the first debate, Senator Kerry almost tie to Bush in every election poll. Some swing States voters are also back to Kerry.

Why would President Bush make the voters down in the first debate? Not only Bush didn't fully respond Kerry's attack and didn't remember Kerry's voting record to offense Kerry, but his emotion was also looks very bad to the publics.

(1)> The first debate: These invisible personnel had manipulate President Bush's emotion and interfered with Bush's thinking during the first debate.

According to Bush's performance in first debate, we saw that Bush's emotion constantly appeared uncomfortable and angry since the debate started from very beginning until to the end of debate. However, President Bush never showed such kind of uncomfortable and angry face to publics before. Obviously, Bush would have received warning to change his emotion from the first lady who sit in front of audiences. However, Bush only changed it a little time then his emotion quickly appeared back angry. This proves that Bush's emotion was manipulated. It means that some invisible personnel would have secretly hid on Bush's head and manipulated Bush's emotion to become angry.

Second, President Bush sometime lost his thinking path and forgot to reply Kerry's charge. For example, during the debate, when Kerry said that Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda attacked us. Saddam didn't attack us. President Bush only respond that I know Bin Laden attacked us, I know that then losing his thinking path. Bush didn't explain that war on Iraq not only because Saddam had WMD, but also because Saddam supported terrorists (Al-Qaeda and other foreign terrorists). This shows Bush was losing his thinking path during the debate. These two facts prove that some tiny invisible personnel had hid on bush's head. These tiny invisible personnel not only manipulate Bush's emotion, but also used stun gun/stick to erase Bush'e memory then caused Bush to lose thinking path.

Also, to manipulate a person's emotion and interfere with one's thinking is a very easy thing to these tiny invisible personnel with mind control technology and so-called non-lethal weapons (see details on http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part1a4.htm ). These involved police/agents (who use invisibility technology) from local to federal units already have these technologies and devices since Clinton Administration transferred mind control device and so-called nonlethal weapon to them in 1994 (see details on http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part1b1.htm ).

I personally have had many of such kind of experiences because these invisible personnel would interfere with my thinking during I write an article or post my articles on Usenet to expose invisible personnel's crimes and secrets. So, I strongly believe that these invisible personnel would have used mind control device (ELF/mind alter electronic emission) to interfere with Bush's thinking or would have used stun gun/stick to erase Bush's original thinking during the first debate.

(Source)- SPOTLIGHT article (7/31/1995)

=========

Dr. Steven Aftergood, a FAS (Federation of American Scientists) spokesman said "The very term 'nonlethal weapons' or 'less-than-lethal' weapons is misleading, because many of these weapons could, in practice, turn out to be lethal." "What particularly worries civilian scientist is a classified Pentagon contract issued earlier this year for the development of high-power electromagnetic generators that interfere with human brain waves. "These electronic 'skull-zappers' [ELF waves - mind altering electric emission] are designed to invade the mind and short-circuit its synapses -- the tiny electric impulses that control our behavior," says Dr. Emery Horvath, a professor of physics at Harvard University.

=======

Their goal is to make bush losing his first debate then stop Bush from being re-elected. How could I make such claim? This is because there's been a vast left-wing conspiracy against George W Bush since he ran for Presidency (see details on http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part2a34.htm ).

It is absolutely false accusation although someone had used picture to claim that President Bush's back might hide a sound system to collect instruction from others during debate. Why would I am so sure what I am saying? First, if President Bush used such kind of sound system device to cheat, those invisible personnel would have known it in advanced before President Bush used it. This is because after use invisibility technology, these invisible personnel (involved police/agents or so-called remote viewers) can secretly spy on President Bush and read his mind with mind machine 24 hours a day. Since these invisible personnel dislike President Bush, they would notify media to catch the evidence at scene during the debate. Then George Bush's political career would be finished. However, it didn't happen.

Second, such kind of cheating activity need some experts who know the better answer to instruct President Bush with sound system during the debate. So, it need a group of people (including experts) to commit such crime. Obviously, not only President Bush would not do it, but also no experts would joined it to commit this crime.

Third, if President Bush used sound device to cheat in his first debate, he would have better performance than other second and third debates. However, everyone clearly know the facts that President Bush's second debate and third debate are far better than his first debate.

Fourth, If President Bush used sound system device to cheat during his first debate, he would pretend his attitude as normal as usual to prevent publics from knowing that he was cheating. However, President Bush's emotion was angry from the very beginning of first debate and it was obvious abnormal. President Bush's angry emotion would easily attract public's attention and it would easily expose that if he used sound device at scene.

Thus, based on above four facts, it proves that President Bush didn't use sound system device on his back. Such kind of false accusation is only trying to mislead the publics and damage President Bush's character. Furthermore, President Bush's angry emotion in first debate only shows that his emotion was manipulated by those invisible personnel. These invisible personnel also had used device to interfere with his thinking path during debate.

(2). Bush won the second debate but result had been changed a few days later.

After I post my article on Usenet to openly warn these invisible personnel, they didn't do the same thing on President Bush as the first debate. Also, President Bush must used more time to prepare his second debate. Thus, during the second debate, not only President Bush's performance was clearly much better than his first debate, but his offense on Kerry was also much stronger. After the second debate, I heard that some of analysts (e.g Pat Buchanan) in MSNBC said that Bush won the second debate, or said that Bush's performance was very good. Also, when I changed the channel to CNN, I heard that it is tie.

Later, early morning, I watched the second debate again on C-Span. This time, I carefully count that who made more offensive attacks on their opponent on the second debate. After the debate end, I have concluded and am convinced that Bush was the winner. I also read the quickly poll from CNN after debate, It indicated 57% to 41% and Bush was the winner. On Saturday afternoon, I watched Fox News channel's political show of Beltway Boys. The host, Fred Barnes said that he had watched the second debate twice and convinced that Bush is the winner. So, what I had learned from my own experiences, from quick poll and from political experts all concluded that Bush was the winner of second debate. However, after a few days, the result was changed and winner became Kerry. Why? The change is most likely caused by liberals' rule or those invisible personnel's motivation against Bush. To help Kerry's presidential campaign against Bush, those invisible personnel and liberals have used their influence to make the winner of second debate to be Kerry. In a very close debate, they can easily make a decision first then sway public opinion on whether it was a tie or who won the debate.

By examining the first and second debate, I strongly believe that these invisible personnel have used their technologies and influence to manipulate current Presidential election. To help Kerry to gain more votes, these invisible personnel had manipulated Bush's emotion to become angry and used device (ELF and stun gun/stick) to interfered with President Bush's thinking path. It made President Bush to show bad performance under 5.5 million Americans' watch at the first debate. It caused John Kerry to regain his footing and earn many swing States back to him.

Although these invisible personnel didn't interfere with Bush at second debate, they still used their influence to change the results. Thus, although we clearly knew that Bush won the second debate, the pull showed that Kerry was still the winner of second debate. In a very close debate, they can easily make a decision first then sway public opinion on whether it was a tie or who won the debate.

Thus, I can predict that since President Bush cannot decisively win Kerry at third debate, these invisible personnel and liberals would decide that Kerry is still the winner even it is a tie or Bush win Kerry by small margin.

Thus, they can use the slogan (that no one can be elected to be President if he lose three debates) to damage George W. Bush as a loser and promote Kerry's Presidential campaign.

To prevent their bad intention and tactic to effect/manipulate voters in Presidential election, I would ask Americans to be aware of the unfair outcome of second debate (Bush won the second debate but result had been changed a few days later). The unfair conclusion on second debate means that they can easily let Kerry to win all debates and use it to damage George Bush. Furthermore, they will use it to promote Kerry as a brilliant leader and gain more swing States.

(3). Bush won third debate but polls (bias) favor Kerry:

Based on the conclusion of many political analysts (see names later), Bush won third debate or it was a draw. However, as I predicted, liberals and invisible personnel still used their influence to make the polls (bias) favor Kerry.

According to Fox News Channel special show (Host Brit Hume) after debate, the quests Beltway boys host Mort Kondracke, Fred Barnes and (Weekly Standard magazine editor ) Bill Kristol all made their comments and agree with that Bush was the winner of third debate.

MSNBC Joe Scarborough said that it is a draw. Anyone who claim that Kerry or Bush is the winner (in third debate) will be either a liar or bias.

Ms. Doris Goodwin (President Historian) said that Bush won on style in third debate during a interview in phone with Imus.

ABC polls shows that the third debate was draw. Although 42% favor Kerry, 41% favor Bush but the 1% difference was within the poll error. So, based on ABC News poll, third debate was still a draw. So, at the third debate , Bush should be the winner or it is a draw. Based on above information and the conclusion of many political analysts, if other media poll's result appear obviously different, it must be either a mistake or would have been manipulated by liberal media (which are bias) and those invisible personnel.

However, most liberal media have cooperated with these invisible personnel to help Kerry in this election. So, under those invisible personnel and liberals' influence, they will use polls (which are bias) as public opinion and claim that Kerry were the winner in third debates. This is as similar as the second debate. Also, they will use that Kerry won all debates to help Kerry to promote his presidential campaign..

(4). The proof and Conclusion after the outcome of Presidential election :

If the final results showing on media polls (about those three debates) were really voters' opinions and Americans did believe that John Kerry won all three debates, then Americans would vote to Kerry and Kerry would be elected as the President. However, the outcome of election day tells that most of Americans agree with alan Yu that George Bush won second or third debate. So, after third debate, voters were back to George W Bush. The outcome of Presidential election proves that my original statement is true that those invisible personnel had secretly cooperated with their operatives who hide in left-wings media to create fake polls on the second and third debates in favor of John Kerry since their goal is to knock down Bush in Presidential election..

These invisible personnel had created many fake polls about some battleground States before the election day coming to mislead the public. Furthermore, their operatives who hide in media also used exit polls to spread fake information to the public. This made all media who trust exit polls to mistakenly believed that John Kerry would be elected as the President. They used such kind method to mislead the public that in this election, to vote against Bush were the main stream because they want to influence voters toward Kerry and knock down George Bush in the election. However, their tactics didn't succeed and the fact is obviously different than those fake polls. President Bush won the popular votes (over three millions votes' difference) and 286 electoral college.