| I urge
you to search the Holy Bible and see there God's many
wonderful promises to you. 2)
What about the facts of history?
- An
abundance of old Bible manuscripts that we can examine
To state,
"The Qur'an says the Bible has been changed,"
is not convincing for the person wanting to examine all
the evidence. Those bringing this serious charge need to
be willing and able to bring proof showing clearly that
what they are saying is a historical fact.
They need
to provide answers to such questions as:
1) When was it
changed ?
2) Who changed it ?
3) Why was it
changed ?
4) What changes
were made ?
5) Where is the
"original" Bible that we can compare it with to
prove the change happened ?
Do you
have answers for these five questions ?
If the
Bible has been distorted then there will be proof. There
will be convincing evidence and answers to these
questions.
1) When was
the Bible changed?
If the charge of
corruption is true, then very big changes must have been
made to the text of the Bible before Islam began in
Arabia. This, however, is not what we find. What we
actually find are at least 292 ancient manuscripts
(hand-written copies) written before 600 AD. These copies
agree completely with the Bible available today that you
can buy in your local bookshop. These ancient manuscripts
are written in the original languages of Greek and
Hebrew. Trained scholars have translated them to give us
an accurate translation in a language we can understand.
We have
copies of the Bible that predate Islam by up to 450
years! These copies agree with today's Bible in EVERY
point of teaching and doctrine. If you want to look for
yourself, pay a visit to the British Museum in Great
Russell Street, London. You will see there two Ancient
Greek manuscripts on public display all year round -
Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Sinaiticus. Ask the curator
how old they are.
Such
evidence speaks for itself. The Bible cannot have
undergone the changes that many Muslims believe. The
manuscripts say "no!" to the
charge of corruption.
2) Who
changed the Bible?
Those
usually charged with this scandalous crime are Jews and
Christians - otherwise known as "the People of the
Book." Could this have been possible?
Did the
Jews change the Bible?
The Jews
are well known for their zeal in preserving their sacred
Scriptures. They know the exact number of words and
letters it contains. Those scribes responsible for the
copying of the ancient Hebrew text showed amazing
reverence and deep respect for the Scriptures in their
hands. If they made even a small mistake whilst copying,
that whole section was reverently disposed of. When they
came to the name of God in the text, they would go and
wash themselves before continuing. Such is their
reverence for their Holy Book.
We must
also ask the question, "Why would the Jews wish to
change the text of Scripture so that Jesus the Son of
Mary is continually revealed as God's Messiah - an idea
to which they became totally opposed?" That would
make no sense whatsoever.
Did the
Christians change the Bible?
You may
have heard this but again there is no evidence. The
documents of the New Testament were written by Christ's
Apostles or close companions of the Apostles. They were
moved by God's Spirit to record Holy Scripture. They were
eyewitnesses of the events of which they wrote. They
watched Christ and knew him intimately. They loved him
and were willing to die for what they heard Christ say
and saw him do. Their writings come to us in an unbroken
line of testimony. Their books from the very first have
always been regarded as reliable Holy Scripture coming
from God Himself.
Within a
very short time Christianity, and copies of the Bible had
spread over a wide area. There were translations of the
Christian Scriptures into several languages distributed
very early on. See the map below Illustrating the Early
Spread of the Bible Before AD 600. Because there were so
many copies, written in different languages, in so many
places, in the possession of so many people, it would
have been impossible to arrange or even agree to any
change being made. History records no council or
gathering where supposed changes were agreed upon. In
fact, when groups tried to alter the Scriptures, they
were exposed and condemned as heretics.

"People
of the Book" had and still do have a deep respect
and love for Holy Scripture. This is shown in the way we
have preserved all the manuscripts. Christians have not
destroyed or discarded any.
Did Jews
and Christians agree together to change the Bible ?
To change
the whole Bible, Jews and Christians would have had to
agree to alter both the Old and New Testaments. This is
out of the question as Jews and Christians, after the
time of Jesus Christ, were opposed to each other. They
would not have been able to agree on any change
whatsoever! There would have been a definite outcry from
one party had the other even attempted to change their
Holy Book.
3) Why was
the Bible changed?
Every
crime has its motive. What could possibly be the motive
for the "People of the Book" changing their own
Scripture? Consider these two passages from the Old and
New Testaments:
"Do
not add to what I command you and do not subtract from
it, but keep the commandments of the Lord your God that I
give you." (Deuteronomy
4:2)
"But
even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel
other than the one we preached to you, let him be
eternally condemned!" (Galatians
1:8)
Would
corrupting their own books be more preferable than their
eternal blessing? The warnings in the Bible are many and
severe against anyone trying to change God's Holy
revelation. It makes no sense to say that they went
against such warnings, and then even preserved the very
warnings they were ignoring.
Christians
were willing to lay down their lives for the sake of the
Gospel message they had been given so that it might be
preserved and spread. Many died during several periods of
intense persecution. Would anyone die a martyr's death
for a book he knew to be a fraud? It makes no sense.
If one
looks at the content of the Holy Bible, one is led to ask
What possible gain would there be for men to invent
such a Book? This is so when we realise that the
Bible:
forbids all sin (even sins of the mind and heart)
commands all duty (loving God completely and one's
neighbour as oneself)
exposes the weaknesses and failings of its human
authors (even the heroes of the Bible are described
very honestly)
humbles man completely by insisting that salvation is
only by God's free gift of salvation and not obtained
by our own deeds. (Don't we naturally feel we are not
too bad and can therefore do something to merit God's
favour?)
These
things show that the Bible is not of human origin, men
would not write such things. It must originate from God
Himself, and have been revealed perfectly through His
servants.
4) What
changes were made to the Bible?
Whatever
changes have been attempted have been exposed and
corrected by scholars. Modern translations of the Bible
are the products of their painstaking study. If someone
has a proof of changes that haven't been recognised, they
need to present them. Christians and Jews alike do not
want their books to have errors.
5) Where is
this "original" Bible?
Since it
was revealed from God, many have disagreed with the
Bible. It has been banned, burned, misinterpreted, and
misquoted. Proud human hearts, offended by its message of
free salvation in Jesus Christ alone, have despised it.
But hated as it is, no one has ever been able to prove
that today's Bible is not the original Bible that God
revealed to mankind. No different "original"
has ever been displayed.
Conclusions
|