Where did this come from?
As I pointed out last issue, because of my web site, I get a lot of e-mail. This is the second part of an essay I wrote after a
columnist for a national children’s magazine e-mailed me with a question one his readers had asked: What if Napoleon had a B52
at the Battle of Waterloo? I gave him my answer, and figured that since I had already done a great deal of thinking about the
issue I would write up a brief scenario on it.
Last issue, I figured out a reasonably plausible way to get an intact B52 complete with crew and weapons into Napoleon’s hands. I
hadn’t found a way to get that B52 back in the air without possibly aborting the Battle of Waterloo. Give Napoleon the plane long
enough before the battle for him to build a runway, and the French or the Allies might change their patterns of activity enough to
make the battle somewhere else, if it happened at all.
I said at the end of last issue’s essay: Let’s say Napoleon doesn’t have enough time to improvise a way of getting his B52 off the ground. I say he still wins the battle.
I’ll let you know why next issue. (There are actually probably a number of reasons. See if you can guess
mine).
Well, in case you hadn’t already guessed, I say that Napoleon would win by using the crews’ tactical radios. The crew-members
would almost certainly each have one in case of a crash. The radios would give Napoleon an enormous advantage in coordinating
the movements of his forces. Given his genius at battle, the radios would win Waterloo for him and probably any other battle he
chose to fight until the batteries went dead.
So, does that mean that we would all live in a French-dominated world? My first thought is: probably not. Napoleon’s downfall
came about not just from losing a battle, but also and primarily from not knowing when to stop fighting. France, even led by
Napoleon, could not indefinitely dominate Europe in the face of hostility on the part of all of the other Great Powers. Napoleon
could have had a peace that left him in control of France and even some areas around it several times, even after his disastrous
invasion of Russia. He wouldn’t take it, and so he lost everything. Eventually the batteries would run out, and a situation
would arise where not even Napoleon’s military and organizational genius could save him.
On the other hand, the B52 and its crew could be a continuing source of advantages for the French. French gunsmiths would be
intrigued by any handguns captured from the crew. They probably wouldn’t be able to duplicate them immediately, but I would be
willing to bet that they would come up with some kind of relatively rapid-fire weapon once they knew that such a thing was
possible. The B52’s engine and tires, and suspension would inspire solutions to hundreds of previously insolvable problems.
If
any of the crew was carrying a pocket calculator, French science would be in a position to dominate the world. A scientific
calculator would be better, but even a ‘4-banger’ would put an enormous amount of calculating firepower at the disposal of French
mathematicians. If any of the crew had even a casual acquaintance with code-breaking, even to the extent of knowing or thinking
and saying that any code can be broken, then the French could gain a very large edge over their opponents.
What do you think? How would the world develop? What would it look like 185 years or so down the road in the year 2000?
.
If you enjoyed this scenario, or if you are disappointed with it, please let me know. I always read and enjoy any feedback I can
get.
Note: I'm still planning to start an 'e-mail to
the editor' section soon. If you do e-mail me, please tell me if you want me
to use your e-mail in that section. I respect your privacy and will not use your comments unless you tell me it is
okay to do so.