Champaign Central
Neighborhood
Association

CCNA is... The Champaign Central Neighborhood Association (CCNA) is made up of residents and/or property owners from the historic central part of Champaign, Illinois. This includes the "Area 4A" neighborhoods bounded by Randolph Street (E), Springfield Avenue (S), Mattis Avenue (W), and Washington Street (N). It is this group's mission to find a low cost solution to the streetlight problems we are now experiencing and which have been anticipated by City Council officials since 1993. As a result of lack of maintenance to these historic streetlights, a major rehabilitation is now needed to replace the wiring (estimated at 80% of the total project cost). Total project cost will also include City staff's time at all resident informational meetings, as well as design engineering costs for the project.

To Join CCNA...

CCNA would love to have you join at any level of activity that is comfortable for you. Just go to our online membership form and fill it out. You will be included in our email announcements (if you supply an address) and other projects as indicated by your interest choices. Thanks in advance for your support! (If your browser does not support forms, email CCNA President Scott Christenson at CCNAlights@aol.com.)

Upcoming Events...

PWD Report to City Council on Their Survey Results Champaign City Building Council Chambers
(NOTE DATE CHANGE FROM ORIGINAL DEC. 10 TO DEC. 9)
Wednesday, December 9th, 1998
7:00 PM - 9:00 PM

PLEASE ATTEND! We expect the PWD's tally to show that we residents don't WANT the streetlights (when in fact we don't want to PAY their $1,200 estimated 50% cost). This may be one of the last chances we will have to speak out on this issue.

What's the Deal with the TWO Surveys?

In late August, 1998, the City of Champaign began preparing a survey form and cover letter to send to 1,350 Area 4A residents (property owners and tenants alike). Rick Marley, Assistant City Engineer with the Public Works Division (PWD), and Mable Thomas, Neighborhood Services Coordinator, worked with Area 4B resident Tom O'Rourke to draft of a survey which severely limited the nine resolution options that had been agreed upon in May, 1998 after many months of CCNA negotiations (see Public Works Department's Area 4A Street Light Improvement Project Cost Estimates below). CCNA volunteers sat down with these three individuals to suggest changes and additions which we felt would make the survey more meaningful. 95% of our recommendations were rejected (they agreed to drop a question asking property owners how they wanted to pay their 50% share), and the City's survey became only two questions: The City had arbitrarily cut the nine options discussed in May to only three options for type of lighting:
  • rehabilitation of existing system's 728 "short pole" (12 foot tall) lights, lining both sides of our streets, at a 50/50 cost share between City's General Revenue Funds and property owners, $1.5 million cost to each
  • replacing the existing system with 417 "tall pole" (22.5 foot tall) truss arm lights on only one side of our streets, at a 50/50 cost share between City's General Revenue Funds and property owners, $950,00 cost to each
  • remove the existing system "when they can no longer be safely operated or economically maintained," having NO lights on our streets, at a cost of $200,000 paid from the City's General Revenue Funds (and no cost to property owners).
  • The only other question on their survey combined ALL of the various options for lighting color and brightness, which had been discussed and hammered out through many meetings last winter and spring, into three options:

  • white light (116 watt incandescent bulb) similar to what exists now; option only available for short poles, at an estimated annual cost for bulb replacement of $4,100 (paid for from City funds)
  • bluish-white light (100 watt metal halide bulb) somewhat brighter than what exists now; option available on either short or tall poles, at an estimated annual cost for bulb replacement of $12,400 (paid for from City funds)
  • yellow-orange light (100 watt high pressure sodium bulb), much brighter than what exists now; option available on either short or tall poles, at an estimated annual cost for bulb replacement of $2,900 (paid for from City funds)
  • The City's full cover letter and two-question survey WAS available online from their Street Light Information web site up until a few days ago. We have requested that they repost it so that you can read it and decide for yourself if it meets the needs of informing the Council about the residents' desire in this matter. In any case, the site contains many useful links to the terms and types of light being discussed, and to scans of previous Council resolutions relevant to street light maintenance and rennovation, cost sharing, special assessments, and reports.

    The CCNA Area 4A Neighborhood Coordinating Committee felt this two-question survey would not fully allow residents to express their desires. The City's version linked too many variables into each option. They drafted a modified survey and twice asked Mr. Marley to substitute it for the City's non-correlatable questions. They were refused both times. At that point, the Committee decided to publish and hand-deliver the CCNA survey to every Area 4A resident ourselves, asking the residents to return it in place of the City's survey. It was printed on NCR paper (two copies); one was to be mailed to the City and one to an independent marketing group at the UI who volunteered to perform an impartial tally of the CCNA survey results. This turned out to be a very wise move, since the City declared the CCNA surveys to be invalid and threw them away!

    The CCNA survey asked residents the following questions:

    0) Are you a property owner or a tenant?

    1) Which type of streetlight would you like in your neighborhood regardless of cost?

    (mark in order of preference 1,2,3,4 where 1=first choice and 4=last choice)
    ___ existing style of short pole (10 ft. cast iron pole, white globe, incandescent bulb) located throughout 4A lighting district
    ___ overhead boom pole (20 ft. aluminum, with HPS light bulb - an orange/yellow color) like those located on the 800 block of W. Columbia Street, Champaign
    ___ davit pole (25 ft. aluminum, with with HPS light bulb - an orange/yellow color) like those located on the the 800 block of W. Maple Street, Champaign
    ___ no street lights

    2) How much would you be willing to spend on your neighborhood's streetlights? (circle one)
    A. $0.00
    B. $0.01 to $249
    C. $250 to $499
    D. $500 to $749
    E. $750 to $999
    F. $1,000 to $1,250
    _____ check here if you would like to have this financed over a 10 year period by the City of Champaign

    3) If monies are not available to complete the entire project at one time, what do you want done? (circle one)
    A. no change to the present system until the full amount is available; lights may have to be out for some period of time
    B. rewire the entire system but do the rest of the above ground maintenance on an as-needed basis over a period of 2 to 10 years or as funds are made available
    C. upgrade the section that is in most need of repair and upgrade the other sections over a period of 2 to 10 years

    4) Brightness of light
    place an x where you feel you would like the brightness of light to be in your neighborhood lights,
    regardless of pole type:

    (level of light)
    No light [____________] [____________] [____________] [____________]Brighter
    same

    5) Comments: (three lines left open for residents to write onto)

    Results of the CCNA Survey

    A total of 357 usable surveys were statistically analyzed (using SPSS) by the UI volunteer team, resulting in the following major findings:
  • 92.3% of respondents are property owners; 7.7% are tenants
  • regarding pole type, 97.5% of respondents chose the existing style of short poles as their first choice, 7.9% chose overhead boom poles as their first choice, 1.2% chose davit poles as their first choice, and 6.2% chose no street lights
  • regarding property owners' payment of cost-sharing, 32.9% of respondents chose the $0 option, 16.6% chose the $0.01-$249 option, 19.9% chose the $250-$499 option, 20% chose the $500-$999 option, and 13% chose the $1000-$1250 option (NOTE: at their May 21, 1998 meeting, the City Council decided FOR the propety owners that they would pay 50% of the cost -- about $1250 each for the short pole option -- but this is the first time the residents have had their say on the matter)
  • regarding 10 year financing by the City of Champaign, 50.1% of respondents chose this option
  • regarding options if the entire money for the project is not available, 45.5% of respondents thought the City should rewire the entire system, 43% chose upgrading the section most in need of repairs, and 11.5% chose no change to the present system until all the funds are available
  • regarding the brightness of the street lights, 74.4% of respondents selected the option of keeing the lighting level the same as exists now, and 21% selected a slightly higher brightness level (NOTE: since approximately 20% of the electricity feeding the existing system is being erroded into the ground due to poor insulation on the old underground wiring, the slightly brighter level is what these lights originally produced when installed in 1930)
  • 47.6% of respondents gave comments
  • using crosstable (chi-square) to test if there was an association between brightness of light and property owner/tenant, it was found that property owners chose a level close to the existing brightness while tenants chose a slightly higher level of brightness
  • CCNA's newsletter, The Illuminator...

    CCNA has published two newsletters, and Block Captains have hand-delivered them to every home in Area 4A. You can still read them online (click below). Volume 1, Page 2 offers some great reasons "Why the City should not charge us a special tax to preserve and maintain our present street lighting system" and lists the City Council members' names, phone numbers, and term end date. Don't hesitate to call them with your opinions!
    page 1 and page 2.

    The second volume of The Illuminator contained a summary of the May 21 CCNA march to City Hall, and excerpts from the transcribed responses of Council Members after they heard three HOURS of individual testimony opposing the City's cost sharing policy to pay for ongoing infrastructure maintenance and support. It is in the process of being scanned for a link to this site.

    Issues of Concern...

    What do the residents and property owners of the Champaign central neighborhood want?
    see survey results above

    Aren't street lights paid for by our tax dollars?
    Not in Champaign. According to the 1993 Street Light Master Plan adopted by the City Council on November 16, 1993, the cost sharing ratio for rehabilitation is set up so that property owner pay 75% of the project cost and the City of Champaign pays 25% of the project cost from its Capital Improvement Fund. That Plan estimated the Area 4A project to cost approximately $2.5 million for rehabilitating our 728 streetlights (that's $3,500 per pole), comparable to the $6 million that Urbana is spending from their General Revenue Fund over the next nine years to rennovate 3,500 of their historic-style lighting (at only $1,715 per pole, or approximately HALF of our projected cost). At their May 21, 1998 meeting, the Champaign City Council acknowledged that there was in fact no "city standard" light pole, agreed that the current historic "short poles" were of value to the City, and voted to cost share with the Area 4A property owners at a 50-50 percentage to restore them.

    What are our Utility Taxes associated with the Franchise Fee Revenue?
    City Utility Taxes are included in your power and water bills. Also, the utilities pay a Franchise Fee to the City. Why aren't these funds being counted as citizen contributions? Scott Christensen asked these questions of Betsy Byrnes, the City of Champaign Financial Analyst. Her answer is a shocker -- we scanned it for you to read: Byrnes' May 8, 1998 memo. (Did YOU know that Illinois Power Company provides the City with 166,100 Therms of Natural Gas at no charge and provides one-half of the cost of electricity for street lights and one-half of the cost of street lamps? Someone should ask if this "help" that the City is getting from Illinois Power Company is taken into account when the Public Works Department claims that Option 3, KEEPING our incandescant street lights, claims that the next 40 years of Energy and Maintenance Costs will be $491,500 for Electrical Energy and $307,000 to Clean and Re-lamp the Fixtures. And, if they ARE counting the Utility Taxes in these figures, why aren't they instead listed under Costs Paid by Owners (i.e. the tax PAYers)? They claim that the Property Owner's Cost is $0! Who do they think provides the funds for the City General Revenue?!!

    What are our rehabilitation options?
    Good question. As explained by Rick Marley, Champaign Public Works Dept. Assistant City Engineer, at an April 28, 1998 public information meeting, there were nine alternatives, or "Cost Estimate Assumptions," being explored by the Publics Works Department. These were presented at the May 21, 1998 City Council meeting. A revised report was mailed out May 1, 1998 to every property owner (tax payer) in Area 4A. We have scanned it and reprinted it (see below). Also, we have provided some day and night photos of the options being offered (see farther below). However, the October 9, 1998 City Survey sent out to Area 4A residents severely cut these options. Why? You'd have to ask Rick Marley.

    Please note that, if the current historical cast iron poles are replaced or removed, 100% of the salvage value of these poles will be applied toward reducing the City's share of the cost-sharing "for the removal cost."

    Public Works Department's Area 4A Street Light Improvement Project Cost Estimates Glossary of Street Light Terms,
    page 1 - PWD cover letter, May 1, 1998,
    page 2 - Options 1-3,
    page 3 - Options 4-6, and
    page 4 - Options 5-9.

    Online photographs of street lighting options...

    Photos of our current historic streetlights:

    • as now (incandescant bulbs) during night, this shot is taken looking down Clark Street toward the Champaign City Building. The brighter light on the left edge of the photo is a mercury vapor light in someone's yard (for comparison).

    Photos of some of the alternatives being proposed:

    And it's not just cost-sharing for street lights...

    Twenty-nine year Area 4A resident and CCNA co-president Frank Kearney, a retired electrical engineer with 40 award-winning years of engineering experience, recently had an article published in the News- Gazette. Although they changed his original title from "Infrastructure: streetlights and portapotties" to a more conservative "Citizens pay to see the light," the text remains the same! We offer an online version, and a scanned version of the 1993 Street Lighting Master Plan's Table 9.1: Street Lighting Implementation Plan, which identifies EVERY CHAMPAIGN NEIGHBORHOOD scheduled for street light rennovations -- with 75% of the cost billed to the residents! (Since this Table was designed to be read horizontally on the paper, the scanned image is best read by printing it out and turning the printout on its side.)

    Kearney article
    1993 Street Light Master Plan cover page
    Table 9.1, page 1
    Table 9.1, page 2
    Table 9.1, page 3
    Table 9.1, page 4

    For Additional Information...

    contact CCNA President Scott Christenson at CCNAlights@aol.com

    Last modified: December 3, 1998