Main

 
Win Shares Per Plate Appearance

Win Shares Per Plate Appearance

 

by Cyril Morong

cyrilmorong@aol.com

 

The back of the Win Shares book by Bill James proclaims “Win Shares, a revolutionary system that allows for player evaluation across positions, teams and eras, measures the total sum of player contributions in one groundbreaking number.  James’ latest advancement in the world of statistical analysis is the next big stepping stone in the “greatest players of all time” debate.

 

This website shows how the greatest players rank in Win Shares (WS) per plate appearance (PA).  I did this because WS can never be negative, so the longer a player plays, the more WS he gets.  So I wanted to see how good each player was per plate appearance, sort of by quality instead of quantity. Actually, instead of just dividing WS by PA, I multiplied it by 648, to get an idea of how many WS they would have for a full season.  I used the Lee Sinins Sabermetric Encyclopedia to get PA for each player.

 

Players included in the study had either at least 5000 (PAs) or at least 141 WS or both through the 2001 season.  A few players like Kid Gleason and Cy Seymour, who got alot WS from pitching are not included because I could not easily determine how many of their WS came from pitching.  This information, however, was clearly stated in the book for Babe Ruth.  So his WS per PA has his pitching WS subtracted.

 

I first look at what the breakdown is by position for both the top 100 players and the bottom 100 players.  Then I present the ranking of the 861 players in the study.  Then players are ranked by position.

 

Top 100 Profile

 

Below are how many players from each position were in the top 100 in WS/648PA:

 

Position

Count

% of Total

Expected %

1B

18

18.00%

12.50%

2B

8

8.00%

12.50%

3B

6

6.00%

12.50%

C

12

12.00%

12.50%

OF

50

50.00%

37.50%

SS

6

6.00%

12.50%

 

 

Some observations:

 

1. Players were listed at a position if they played more games there than any other position.  Outfield was counted as one position.

2. Outfielders are very over represented among the top 100 players.

3. Infielders, especially shortstops and third basemen are very under represented among the top 100 players.

 

If WS is supposed to allow for comparisons across positions, this is a surprising result.  Why would so few infielders be in the top 100?  Are outfielders really better than infielders?  Consider the two following teams of eight players. The players on the left are the top 8 in WS/648PA.  The players on the right are the best of the remaining players at their position.  Which team would you expect to win more games if they each had average pitching staffs?

 

Babe Ruth

 

Joe Jackson

Mickey Mantle

 

Willie Mays

Ted Williams

 

Lou Gehrig

Honus Wagner

 

Joe DiMaggio

Ty Cobb

 

Mike Piazza

Barry Bonds

 

Eddie Collins

Rogers Hornsby

 

Mike Schmidt

Tris Speaker

 

Arky Vaughan

 

The team on the left lacks a first baseman, third baseman and catcher.  The team on the right has one player for each position.  Win Shares says that the team on the left must be better since all eight of those players ranks higher than all eight of the players on the right.  Yet the team on the left might not field some positions very well and therefore may not be as good as the team on the right.

 

Bottom 100 Profile

 

What does the bottom 100-player profile look like?

 

Position

Count

% of Total

Expected %

1B

11

11.00%

12.50%

2B

30

30.00%

12.50%

3B

8

8.00%

12.50%

C

4

4.00%

12.50%

OF

21

21.00%

37.50%

SS

26

26.00%

12.50%

 

The reverse of the top 100 is true.  Many fewer outfielders than expected.  But many more second basemen and shortstops than expected.

 

Complete Profile

 

What about the profile of all the players?  There are 861 players in the ranking.  Seven were DHs, so the percentages below in the third column are based on a total 854. The average refers to average WS/648PA.

 

Position

Count

% of Total

Expected %

Average

1B

122

14.29%

12.50%

20.51

2B

107

12.53%

12.50%

18.83

3B

96

11.24%

12.50%

19.92

C

68

7.96%

12.50%

20.98

OF

354

41.45%

37.50%

21.13

SS

107

12.53%

12.50%

18.44

 

Notice that catchers and outfielders have a much higher average than shortstops.  Have catchers and outfielders really been better players than shortstops in baseball history? The low number of catchers might be explained by the wear and tear of the position, making hard to get to 5000 PA.

 

The Complete Rankings

 

Rank

Player

WS per 648 PA

POS

1

Babe Ruth

39.92

OF

2

Mickey Mantle

36.95

OF

3

Ted Williams

36.74

OF

4

Honus Wagner

36.16

SS

5

Ty Cobb

35.79

OF

6

Barry Bonds

34.56

OF

7

Rogers Hornsby

34.33

2B

8

Tris Speaker

34.05

OF

9

Joe Jackson

33.48

OF

10

Willie Mays

33.30

OF

11

Lou Gehrig

32.80

1B

12

Joe DiMaggio

32.69

OF

13

Mike Piazza

31.82

C

14

Benny Kauff

31.82

OF

15

Eddie Collins

30.90

2B

16

Stan Musial

30.79

OF

17

Nap Lajoie

30.73

2B

18

Charlie Keller

30.68

OF

19

Dick Allen

30.30

1B

20

Mel Ott

30.18

OF

21

Frank Chance

30.12

1B

22

Mike Schmidt

30.08

3B

23

Dan Brouthers

29.97

1B

24

Hank Aaron

29.89

OF

25

Arky Vaughan

29.88

SS

26

Johnny Mize

29.71

1B

27

Elmer Flick

29.42

OF

28

Joe Morgan

29.29

2B

29

Home Run Baker

29.29

3B

30

Jimmie Foxx

29.15

1B

31

Yogi Berra

29.06

C

32

Frank Thomas-cws

29.02

1B

33

Mark McGwire

28.93

1B

34

Eddie Mathews

28.87

3B

35

Gabby Hartnett

28.86

C

36

Bill Dickey

28.82

C

37

Billy Hamilton

28.77

OF

38

Mickey Cochrane

28.71

C

39

Jackie Robinson

28.70

2B

40

Frank Robinson

28.64

OF

41

Jeff Bagwell

28.48

1B

42

Hank Greenberg

28.38

1B

43

Alex Rodriguez

28.23

SS

44

King Kelly

27.91

OF

45

Roger Bresnahan

27.86

C

46

Roy Campanella

27.85

C

47

Duke Snider

27.69

OF

48

Wally Berger

27.58

OF

49

Larry Doby

27.56

OF

50

Dave Orr

27.55

1B

51

Pete Browning

27.43

OF

52

Ed Delahanty

27.41

OF

53

Al Rosen

27.41

3B

54

Willie McCovey

27.30

1B

55

Sam Crawford

27.28

OF

56

John McGraw

27.16

3B

57

Gene Tenace

27.09

C

58

Buck Ewing

27.06

C

59

Sherry Magee

26.84

OF

60

Johnny Bench

26.61

C

61

Roger Connor

26.60

1B

62

Willie Stargell

26.56

OF

63

George Gore

26.54

OF

64

Jason Giambi

26.50

1B

65

Barry Larkin

26.45

SS

66

Fred Clarke

26.40

OF

67

Gary Sheffield

26.39

OF

68

Manny Ramirez

26.39

OF

69

Charley Jones

26.36

OF

70

Rickey Henderson

26.34

OF

71

Mike Donlin

26.33

OF

72

Jesse Burkett

26.22

OF

73

Ken Griffey Jr.

26.22

OF

74

Frank Howard

26.17

OF

75

Reggie Smith

26.16

OF

76

Hack Wilson

26.13

OF

77

Pedro Guerrero

26.07

1B

78

Bobby Grich

25.94

2B

79

Will Clark

25.89

1B

80

George Stone

25.81

OF

81

Norm Cash

25.81

1B

82

Darryl Strawberry

25.81

OF

83

Harry Heilmann

25.75

OF

84

Craig Biggio