|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Win Shares Per Plate Appearance by Cyril Morong cyrilmorong@aol.com The back of the Win Shares book by Bill James proclaims “Win Shares, a revolutionary system that allows for player evaluation across positions, teams and eras, measures the total sum of player contributions in one groundbreaking number. James’ latest advancement in the world of statistical analysis is the next big stepping stone in the “greatest players of all time” debate. This website shows how the greatest players rank in Win Shares (WS) per plate appearance (PA). I did this because WS can never be negative, so the longer a player plays, the more WS he gets. So I wanted to see how good each player was per plate appearance, sort of by quality instead of quantity. Actually, instead of just dividing WS by PA, I multiplied it by 648, to get an idea of how many WS they would have for a full season. I used the Lee Sinins Sabermetric Encyclopedia to get PA for each player. Players included in the study had either at least 5000 (PAs) or at least 141 WS or both through the 2001 season. A few players like Kid Gleason and Cy Seymour, who got alot WS from pitching are not included because I could not easily determine how many of their WS came from pitching. This information, however, was clearly stated in the book for Babe Ruth. So his WS per PA has his pitching WS subtracted. I first look at what the breakdown is by position for both the top 100 players and the bottom 100 players. Then I present the ranking of the 861 players in the study. Then players are ranked by position. Top 100 Profile Below are how many players from each position were in the top 100 in WS/648PA:
Some observations: 1. Players were listed at a position if they played more games there than any other position. Outfield was counted as one position. 2. Outfielders are very over represented among the top 100 players. 3. Infielders, especially shortstops and third basemen are very under represented among the top 100 players. If WS is supposed to allow for comparisons across positions, this is a surprising result. Why would so few infielders be in the top 100? Are outfielders really better than infielders? Consider the two following teams of eight players. The players on the left are the top 8 in WS/648PA. The players on the right are the best of the remaining players at their position. Which team would you expect to win more games if they each had average pitching staffs?
The team on the left lacks a first baseman, third baseman and catcher. The team on the right has one player for each position. Win Shares says that the team on the left must be better since all eight of those players ranks higher than all eight of the players on the right. Yet the team on the left might not field some positions very well and therefore may not be as good as the team on the right. Bottom 100 Profile What does the bottom 100-player profile look like?
The reverse of the top 100 is true. Many fewer outfielders than expected. But many more second basemen and shortstops than expected. Complete Profile What about the profile of all the players? There are 861 players in the ranking. Seven were DHs, so the percentages below in the third column are based on a total 854. The average refers to average WS/648PA.
Notice that catchers and outfielders have a much higher average than shortstops. Have catchers and outfielders really been better players than shortstops in baseball history? The low number of catchers might be explained by the wear and tear of the position, making hard to get to 5000 PA. The Complete Rankings
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||