I can just hear you asking, "What is a collateral line, and what use is
that to me?" Those are wonderful questions, and I hope you'll pay close
attention.
I have had great help from collaterals in working around brick walls, so I
would like to share some of the reasons and methods for using them in your
research.
First, a few definitions to help as we go along (from Webster's Ninth
Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 1989):
Affinity –
relationship by marriage.
Collateral – belonging
to the same ancestral stock but not in a direct line of descent.
Cousin – a relative
descended from one’s grandparent or more remote ancestor in a different
line; a child of one’s uncle or aunt [first cousin].
Descent – derivation
from an ancestor.
Kin – a group of
persons of common ancestry; one’s relatives.
Relative – a person
connected to another by blood or affinity.
Sibling – one of two
or more individuals having one common parent.
So, in genealogical terms, a collateral line is any line of descent from one
or more of your ancestors through any other than your own direct line.This can be at any point in the line of
descent: close to you (researching your aunts and uncles, for example), or
"way back" (for example, researching your Mayflower ancestor through
research done by someone in an entirely different line).
First let me say that I recommend you always do SOME research on what I call
"immediate collaterals".These are the siblings of your direct ancestors (full or half).At the least you should get the vital
records for all siblings – birth, marriage, death.Remember that at least one of the parents of these siblings is
also your direct ancestor, so the information you obtain is documentation of the
whereabouts of that ancestor.In
addition, you may just glean additional details about your own ancestor from
it.
Let’s assume, just for the sake of argument, that your ancestors didn’t all
leave perfect records.You’re missing
just one piece of vital information – let’s say, it’s your grandmother’s
father’s name.You’ve tried your
grandparents’ marriage records, census records, birth records, death records,
wills, deeds, and everything else you can think of to check.No luck!All you find is that her name is Mary and she was supposedly born in
Ohio (but you already knew that!). Now
what?This is a perfect situation to
try a collateral line.
Does your grandmother have brothers or sisters?Try THEIR marriage, birth, death, will, deed or other
records.Chances are one of these other
records mentions father’s name.If you
do find a name, be sure to verify that they actually had the same father … but
at least you now have something to work with now.
No luck there?Change tactics.Try your grandfather’s siblings.Maybe one of his brothers married one of her
sisters or mentioned some “cousins” that you can’t identify anywhere else or
had neighbors with a daughter named Mary who was the right age.Again, this isn’t proof, but it is a good “working
hypothesis” until you can disprove it or find something better.
Still no luck? Go back another generation on your grandfather’s side.Look for wills and deeds which might mention
the daughters-in-law.Look for property
or census records again to see who the neighbors were and look for daughters of
the right name and age.Still not proof,
but another "working theory" to start investigating.
Here are a few examples of information on direct ancestors obtained through
collateral relatives' records:
I found a death notice for
the brother of my ancestor Nancy Humiston.I did not know when or where father Jason Humiston had
died.As quoted in the Marietta
Intelligencer of 5 Dec 1854 [emphasis added.]: "Died of flux, at
his father's residence on 26th of September, Giles
Humiston, in the 34th year of his age."The next paragraph was the death notice
of father Jason, who died on the 21st of November in the same
year.
Another interesting tidbit
was obtained in checking the marriage records for the brother of Martha
Fox.Martha married Alexander
Stewart Cummings.Her brother
George married Alexander’s sister Martha on the same day.This explained why we continued to find
records of Martha Fox after our Martha’s marriage to a Cummings.These were actually records of her
sister-in-law.The two Marthas
traded names!
Sometimes you need to dig a little deeper, or vital records don’t have the
information you need.Your own ancestor
may not have left you exactly what you want, but someone else may have.
For example, I wanted to
obtain the passenger list information for my grandmother, who came from
Denmark as a child with her family.Her naturalization certificate doesn’t give any date or ship
information – she used her father’s first papers for documentation, and I
have not yet been able to locate a copy of those.However, a cousin inherited the
naturalization papers of my grandmother’s sister, which DID give a ship
and date of arrival. I was able to
find the passenger list and verify the children and mother’s arrival.Note: he also found the papers of one
of their brothers, which had the WRONG ship, but correct date of
arrival.This is a reminder to not
stop with just one piece of information – keep digging for more until you have
either exhausted EVERY possibility or have such overwhelming evidence (and
no contradictory evidence) that it must be correct.
Checking the obituary of a
sibling will sometimes provide information on place of birth or residences
in childhood. It may indicate when the individual moved to the locale, and
if it was before adulthood, they were probably with the rest of the
family.
To find the parents of an
ancestor in the 20th century, Social Security records can sometimes be
helpful. See my column on Using Social Security
Records for details on what it is and how to use this tool. Then
request the SS5 for all the relatives you can find. Since the application
requested the parents' names, check them all. Any variations may give you
additional clues, and what is missing on one may be there on another.
Another example.I wanted to find information on my
great-great grandfather, Asbury Crisman.I knew that he had children born between 1871 and 1894, so it was
possible that he or a brother might have served in the Civil War – but I
didn’t even know if he had any brothers.We had an opportunity to visit the National Archives, so we began a
search.No Asbury Crisman was
listed in the pension or service records.But there were dozens of Crismans (and dozens more with other
spellings).I decided to take a
chance and look at some of the files.Sure enough, in one of the files we found a deposition signed by
Asbury Crisman, stating he was brother of the pension applicant.In the same file there was another
deposition, which stated the deponent was brother to AND had served with
the applicant. In HIS file, was a
deposition from another brother, plus reference to a fifth brother
who had died in a Confederate prison camp.We ultimately found files for three brothers and two first
cousins who had received pensions, plus references to two others (one
brother and one cousin) who did not receive pensions – the brother who
died, plus a cousin who survived unscathed and was not eligible for a
pension.There were also
depositions from several of the wives, giving their birth dates and
places.With the information in
these files I was able to put together a rather extensive time line for
the movements of the family between 1850 and 1910, which enabled me to
track the family through the census.This led me back to the "hometown" and records in the
courthouse there – and added two more generations to my family tree.
Missing a widowed mother or aged father?Try the census records of all the children.
Once I put together the
Crisman family above, I started tracking them through the census. Here’s
what I found:
In 1850 (Bedford
County, PA) the brothers (Asbury, William, John, and James) are with
their parents Aaron & Cecilia.Living next door were David Crisman & wife Elizabeth, with 4
children, including the cousins who later served in the Civil War
(Francis, Sanford and John).And
in the next house are John and Susannah, parents of Aaron and David, with
son William still at home.
In 1860, David had
moved to Iowa with his family.After Cecilia died (about 1853) I learned from the pension files
that Aaron had also moved with his family to Iowa.Records show father John died in 1855
in Iowa, so he apparently also moved. I haven’t yet located the widow
Susannah in the census for 1860.
However, in 1870,
widowed mother Susannah is residing with Aaron and his third wife,
Sarah.
In 1880, Sarah is
widowed and all the children are gone, as is Susannah. I'm now looking
for a death record or obituary for her in Iowa.
Another missing widow found:
Charles Wiley Baird died in 1889, leaving his wife Samantha a widow.Since there is no 1890 census for Iowa,
where she moved shortly after his death, the next opportunity in the
federal census is in 1900.She was
listed with her daughter Lucy and husband Henry A. Cummings in Black Hawk
County, IA, but no further records are found in that area. However, in a
search for her other daughter, Susie and husband William T Jones, Samantha
was found living with them in Benton County, Iowa.Further investigation into Civil War
pension records and obituaries indicate that she was living with Susie and
William at the time of her death in 1909.Apparently she moved in 1900 or was visiting with Lucy on census
day.That is still to be determined,
but checking for Susie found Samantha’s final residence.
By the way, also try to research the "step-parents" of your
ancestors … sometimes for several generations up and down the line. Why do
that? Think about the factors that influence us as we grow up … the parents who
raised us have a great impact on our lives - and those may not be the
biological parents. Therefore, I believe in researching the step-parents and
their families to see what factors influenced an ancestor's life.
For example, Samuel Fox's
first wife [Mary Lester] died, leaving Samuel with four small children.
Samuel Fox and his second wife Joanna [Way] had son Isaac. Joanna died
when he was just 6 years old (and brother Benjamin was only 1 year old).
Samuel married Bathsheba Rogers less than a year later - he really needed
a mother for those 6 children. We are very interested in Bathsheba, since
she would have been the primary influence on the life of Isaac, as the
mother who raised him. In researching Bathsheba's family we found that her
brother was the founder of the Seventh Day Baptist Church in Connecticut.
That led us to information that Samuel and Joanna were active members of
the church before her death, and Samuel and Bathsheba continued to be
active after their marriage. This was not a popular religion of the day,
and they were even persecuted by the local civil authorities. Knowing that
provides some idea of the kind of life that Isaac had as a child.
“Step-relatives” may also lead to direct ancestors through the back door –
remember those ancestors who married had to meet somewhere.The most likely places were homes of
friends, neighbors, or other relatives.Be alert for these connections in all your research.
In short, to research collaterals, do the same things you do to track your
direct ancestors. Look at vital records and other primary sources, work your
way back from the known to the unknown, and watch for clues. Once you find
clues in the collateral records, use those to look for proof that they apply to
your direct line as well … it's usually much easier to prove or disprove a
hypothesis than to find facts with no starting place.
·When
you hit a brick wall with your ancestor, start a timeline for the family (if
you haven’t before). Log every life
event you have found for that person, spouse, children, and parents.Indicate the event, date, and place.Then look for gaps to begin your research.
·Record
what you already know about the collateral relatives, especially those who were
(or may have been) in the same place at the same time. Put them on a similar time line and again look for gaps.
·Consider what records might be available for the
relatives that you haven't yet searched. Make a work plan of records that might
be helpful in obtaining the information you need.
·Start gathering records. Document the source of every
record you find. Don't forget to look for information on all family members
while you're in a particular record group or database.
·Log every tidbit of information on the timelines you
started before. Create new timelines for new family members found in case you
need to expand the search.
·Periodically review all the timelines for new gaps or
clues. Follow up on these new hints and keep logging the results.
·If you use a numbering system for your direct ancestors,
determine early in your research how you want to track collaterals. It may not
be necessary to worry about numbers for collaterals, particularly if you use a
computer database and don't assign numbers for your direct ancestors. Check the
references below for suggested numbering systems.
·Be as careful in maintaining and documenting these
sources as with your direct ancestors - this proof may be all you ever find!
[Sorry, I know that's not what you want to see … but sometimes that's the
bottom line.]
·And don't forget to post queries for some of those who
are most likely to be sought by others - these are usually the ones who had
lots of descendants, so there's more chance that one of those descendants is
doing family research.
It may sound like too
much work, but remember, your objective is to know your family, right? Well,
what better way to understand the dynamics of a family than to know all you can
about all the family members?
Croom, Emily Anne.
The Genealogist's Companion & Sourcebook. Cincinnati, OH:
Betterway Books, 1994. See especially Chapter 1 on "Cluster
Genealogy".
Croom, Emily Anne. Unpuzzling
Your Past: A Basic Guide to Genealogy (Second Edition). White Hall,
VA: Betterway Publications, Inc., 1989.
Szucs, Loretto Dennis
and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking. The Source: A Guidebook of American
Genealogy (Revised Edition). Salt Lake City, UT: Ancestry, Inc.,
1997.
Magazines:
Curran, Joan Ferris,
"Numbering Your Genealogy: Sound and Simple Systems," National
Genealogical Society Quarterly, Volume 79, Number 3, September 1991.
Devine, Donn.
"How to Number People in Pedigrees and Genealogies," Ancestry
Newsletter, Volume 4, Number 1, January/February 1986.
Dollarhide, William.
"Descendancy and Collateral Numbering Systems", Genealogy
Bulletin, Volume 15, Number 5, Issue 53, September/October 1999.
Web Sites:
Ancestry.com - Home (Search
Ancestry's FREE Databases. Including SSDI, World Tree, , Message boards,
phone listings)http://ancestry.com/
Rootsweb.World Connect Project (global
database), SSDI, Roots- L, Surname and or Location Mailing list, too many
more to list individually.http://rootsweb.com/
4Genealogy -- a guide
to genealogy and researching your family tree from 4anything.com -- http://www.4genealogy.com/
Other Resources:
Repeat Performance records many
presentations at national and regional genealogical conferences. These are
available on audio cassette for about $7.50 each on-site, through mail order,
or through their web site. A search engine also allows you to search for other
presentations by title or presenter. http:/www.repeatperformance.com/
Specifically look for these:
Joslyn, R., "A
Sibling Is A Small Crawling Animal: Help Among the Collaterals,"
Richmond, VA: NGS Conference in the States, 1999. NGS090.
Lehmann, Joy.“Collateral Relatives: Who Are They
and Why Should I Care?Denver,
CO: NGS Conference in the States, 1998.DEN98W23.
I am always interested in hearing from readers, so if you have any
comments, suggestions, or questions, please email me at:talkgenealogy@aol.com.
Stop by next month for more Pilgrims, Pioneers & Aliens! Happy Hunting!