DIG PROJECT - XIV§2:
Asa Gordon - Lawrence Jamison
Douglass Institute of Government
vs
National Archives and Records Administration

DIGvNARA - Civil Action (CASE NUMBER   1:02CV01551)
Aug. 07, 2002
United States District Court
For The District of Columbia


PRESS RELEASE:
DIG CHALLENGES THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
OF FLORIDA'S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS.

Asa Gordon - Lawrence Jamison
Douglass Institute of Government
vs
Albert Gore, Jr.,
President of the Senate

DIGvGORE - Civil Action (CASE NUMBER   1:00CV03112)
Dec. 29, 2000
United States District Court
For The District of Columbia


RELEVANT ARTICLES
FACING SOUTH: 2000 Elections specia
November 27, 2000 - Issue #1

FACING SOUTH is your source for progressive Southern news and perspectives -- brought to you by the Institute for Southern Studies, a non-profit research and education center and publisher of Southern Exposure magazine. 

COLOR OF THE ELECTIONS [Part 2] - Racial disenfranchisement was key to the Florida (and national) outcome.

In the last issue of FACING SOUTH, we pointed to the growing body of evidence of systematic, deliberate attempts to squelch African American voting in Florida. The media continues to focus on recounts, chads and the Nader factor -- but it's clear that electoral racism played an equally large role in deciding the outcome of the election.

  • THE LYNCHING OF THE BLACK VOTE Columnist Robert Kuttner surveys the evidence of the "Republicans' systematic and extra-legal effort to reduce black voting." (Boston Globe
  • DISENFRANCHISEMENT BY DATABASE The more you look, the more disbarred and "disappeared" voters you find in Florida -- mostly people of color and low- income whites. You'd almost think it was deliberate. (The Observer -- UK
  • MEDIA UNDERREPORTED FLORIDA'S OBSTACLES TO "VOTING WHILE BLACK" Despite widespread allegations of African-American disenfranchisement and coverage by black journalists, the mainstream media ignored the story -- and many journalists still won't cover it. (Minneapolis Star-Tribune
  • THE STRUCTURE OF WHITE POWER AND THE COLOR OF ELECTION 2000

  • More importantly, the botched election exposed that voting discrimination in Florida was widespread and that racism is institutionally structured into the two-party, Electoral College system.(ColorLines Magazine)
  • VOTING RIGHTS: THE ONGOING STRUGGLE Of course, African-American disenfranchisement is nothing new -- we just notice it now because of Florida's close election. Read this excellent piece by Ron Nixon in The Nation from 1999, detailing struggles throughout the 1990s in the South. 
  • MIAMI-DADE REVERSAL - DID MIAMI CUBANS PLAY A ROLE? In Florida, the decision of the Miami-Dade canvassing board to stop ballot recounts was a major blow to Al Gore's presidential hopes. Evidence is mounting that far-right Cuban groups may have played a significant role. (Pacific News Service) 


GEORGIA: A Racial Gap in Voided Votes
 -- the nation now knows that many ballots that are cast don't count as votes. In Florida, where the election hung in the balance, many African Americans discovered that their ballots were nullified at a 
much higher rate than those of whites.
     That problem extended well beyond Florida. For example, in Atlanta's Fulton County, which also uses the old punch-card voting machines, one!  of every 16 of its ballots for president was invalidated, while two largely white and Republican-leaning neighbors using more modern equipment, Cobb and Gwinnett counties, had a rate of 1 in 200.


Fla. Vote Rife With Disparities,
Study Says Rights Panel Finds Blacks Penalized
Florida's conduct of the 2000 presidential election was marked by "injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency" that unfairly penalized minority voters, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has concluded in a report that criticizes top state officials -- particularly Gov. Jeb Bush and Secretary of State Katherine Harris -- for allowing disparate treatment of voters.
The Wrong Way To Fix the Vote
In Florida, a state-run purge removed thousands of legal voters -- more than half of them black -- in the months leading up to last fall's election. Most had no idea what had happened until they showed up at the polls. As the U.S. Civil Rights Commission wrote in a report made public last week, it was this "widespread voter disenfranchisement" -- much more than any hanging chads or butterfly ballots -- that was the "extraordinary feature" of the dubious Florida vote.
...The centralization of state voter registries hands an all-too-tempting monopoly to whichever party controls the office of secretary of state. The highly technical (and, where contractors are involved, commercially confidential) nature of computer-aided purges makes bias in the cleansing of supposed felons, deceased voters and duplicate voters astonishingly easy to carry out and difficult to uncover.
How Democrats Can Use Bush v. Gore
After two decades of concluding that statistical evidence concerning a whole host of inequities -- e.g., the unequal treatment of death row inmates, unequal funding for elementary schools -- failed to support a claim of unequal treatment under our Constitution, in Bush v. Gore, the court found that tolerating relatively minor variances in the tabulation of "undervotes" was an unconstitutional act by the Florida courts. Did the court, in slamming the door on Al Gore, open a window for future litigants to claim unequal treatment in the electoral process? ...
  • If a disparity in the method of tabulating just 0.7 percent of the ballots cast in one state can be declared a violation of the constitutional prohibition against "unequal treatment," how can flat-out ignoring 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent or more of the voters in a particular state be said to pass muster?...
  • If variations in counting "undervotes" violate the Constitution, how can "uncounting" people be ignored?...
  • If hanging chads and dimpled chads are entitled to equal treatment under the law, then surely so too are real-live voters who will be uncounted when districts are drawn -- 




ANNOUNCEMENTS: {Feb., 2002}
  • Asa was  interviewed Tuesday, Dec.27th.~ 8:30pm by Dave Warren on talk radio WHAT 1340AM Philadelphia,Pa. about DIG's Civil Action before the Federal Court contesting the Constitutionality of Florida's Presidential Electors.
  • C-SPANs' live coverage (Jan. 2, 2001, 12-3pm) on the Aftermath of Election 2000, hosted by the Center for Constitutional Rights included Asa Gordon's report on DIG's petition to the federal court to  apply the sanction in Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment. This sanction calls for the reduction of the number of representatives in proportion to the percentage of the class of people unlawfully excluded from the franchise.
  • Hearing on Complaint & TRO:

  • Thur. , Jan. 4th, 2001, 2pm
    US District Judge: Royce C. Lamberth
    Court Rm. 21, 4th Floor
    333 Constitution Ave., N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 2001
    (202) 354-1010
  • Court Ruling Jan. 4, 2001 (See Civil Action link above)
  •  WPFW 89.3FM

  • We Ourselves
    (The Ambrose Lane Show) : 10am , Fri. Jan. 12, 2001
    Asa Gordon & Lawrence Jamison are scheduled for the program
  • PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL FORUM

  • JANUARY 16th, 2001 : 7pm - 8:30pm
    Martin Luther King Jr., Public Library, Room A-5.
  • Jan. 20, 2001 - Asa Gordon of DIG is scheduled to address :

  • THE INAUGURAL DAY VOTER RIGHTS MARCH:-:EVENT PHOTOS
  • MAY 19th, 2001 VOTER RIGHTS MARCH SPEAKERS -

  • Asa Gordon will be a speaker at the WEST CAPITAL STEPS
  • Supreme Redemption: How the Supreme Court Stole Election 2000 - (XIV-II)

  • DATE: February 12, 2002
    TIME: 7pm
    PLACE: Martin Luther King Library, 901 G Street, N.W., Rm. A-5
    (202) 727-121
Voter March Rap
Racial and Elitist Profiling in American Democracy
May 19, 2001
Transcript of Asa Gordons Speech

DIG Home pg.