Most Recent issue of Ginchy!
3-03-1999
 
 
 The Department of Special Media Preservation presents . . ..   
GINCHY!   
"World's Greatest Comic Fanzine"

Welcome to the "Whatever happened to Ginchy! the Comics Zine?" issue of Ginchy! the Comics Zine.  Since we last spoke, National Periodical Publications officially changed its name to DC Comics, Jim Shooter came and went at Marvel (formerly Timely), and Adventure Comics' Adventurers was briefly advertised all over CBG as the 'hottest' book on the market.  What became of the Ginchy! crew you knew and loved in the meantime?  Well, Joe Kalicki found Dylan and now studies album jackets in a hushed awe the whole day long.  Ian Casselberry currently pursues his dreams in the wilds of Ann Arbor, MI, and is using the fame he found in the fanzine world to effectively court actress Ashley Judd (could those be wedding bells this June?).  As for editors Matt Sommer and Joe Lunday, no one is quite sure what became of them after Ginchy! #41, although frequent "sightings" have been popping up from time to time on radio personality Art Bell's syndicated call-in program (most recently the pair were sighted by 47 year-old Tallahasee, FL resident Eunice Pfester in a local Denny's).  This most recent issue was culled from their unpublished notes and outlines, and with the help of a ghost writer, we've managed to recreate what their actual reviews of some current comics might look like, were they with us today!  (Look for contributions from V.C. Andrews in future issues.) 

As you browse our latest offering, you'll find Joe Linehan and Austin English eulogizing two rather different comic book institutions, reviews of the latest issues of Inhumans, Bone, Robin, and Magic Whistle, as well the debuts of Hulk, The Lemon Kids, and Planetary.  Perennial Ginchy! standby Troy Nunis offers up his latest helping of mind-sharpening trivia, and you speak your mind in our latest letters column.  Enjoy, and be sure to check out our website at: 

 Ginchy! The Comics Zine  

And by the way, a BIG thanks to Phil Hall, web guru for the excellent UK comics magazine Comics International for all the recent Ginchy! plugs in his column, and welcome to any and all UK/European readers who've checked us out due to said coverage.  If this is your first issue, make sure to let us know what you think, and keep in mind Ginchy! is always on the lookout for contributions . . . and now with Joe and Matt on the lam, those contributions are more important than ever! 
 

 
 
 
In This Issue:
PART ONE: PART TWO: PART THREE:
NEWS Shades Of Gray TRIVIA
Tales From The Front REVIEWS RAVES
How Ginchy! Are We? LAST CALL
 
PART ONE:
 
NEWS 
compiled by the GINCHY! staff 

 -- Writer/Artist David Mack, best known for his work on creator owned Kabuki, will serve as Kevin Smith's replacement on Daredevil with May's issue, #9.  According to artist Joe Quesada, Mack's take on DD will focus more on the internal workings of the characters' psyches, starting with a look into the mind of the Kingpin. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- More musical chairs in the art department of the Superman books, as artist German Garcia will be taking the reigns of Action Comics starting in October.  Steve Epting, who was on Action will be moving over to Adventures of Superman, which will most likely change all over again when Stuart Immonen comes back to the book in early 2000, and penciller Ed McGuinness will be taking on the adjectiveless Superman.  Garcia, who was set to pencil Marvel's X-51, is no longer attached to the project.  In other Super news, the quarterly Superman: Man of Tomorrow will be cancelled with issue #15. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/newsarama/index.html 

-- Continuing the cross-over tradition of the last few years, Marvel and DC will be teaming up once again in May to bring readers Hulk vs. Superman: Double Lives.  Written by Roger Stern and with art by Steve Rude, the book chronicles the first meeting of the two powerhouses.  I wonder if, through some wacky misunderstanding, the two heroes will fight each other for the bulk of the issue before teaming up to defeat the true menace?  Nah. 
http://www.detnews.com/comicbooks/ 

-- Keep in mind that this is MAJOR rumor here, but Rich's Ramblings has reported that a possible writer's company or imprint (something like Dark Horse's Legend imprint crossed with an Image style breakaway?), supposedly including such creators as Mark Waid, Grant Morrison, Kurt Busiek, Tom Peyer, Roger Stern, Garth Ennis and Joe Kelly, may be in the works as early as late '99.  This new venture may be published through an existing company, or may be an independent creation.  Mark Waid has aparently denied his involvement in such a project, however. 
http://www.twistandshoutcomics.com/features/rrevs.html 

-- Due to widespread demand, DC will release a TPB collection of the stories that kicked off the year's big Batman event, No Man's Land, on March 24th.  The collection will have no ads, 112 pages including the Batman: No Man's Land special and the sold-out Shadow Of The Bat #83, Batman #563, and Detective Comics #730, and sell for $5.95. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- Green Lantern editor Kevin Dooley gave Mania a look into GL's future last week, which holds, among other things, a hardcover graphic novel entitled Fear Itself (which spotlights all 3 GL's fighting the same fear-inducing villian), and an upcoming 2 part story, #115-116, written by Dan Jurgens which teams Kyle with Booster Gold and Plastic Man. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- Writer Mike Baron and artist Tom Yeats are working on a new mini-series for Vertigo entitled Burnout, which focuses on the eternal struggle of magic and technology, with immortality as the ultimate prize.  A release date has not been set. 
http://www.detnews.com/comicbooks/ 

-- John L. Goldwater, the creator of most of the Archie Comics characters, died Friday, February 26th in New York City.  Goldwater was 83. 
http://www.comicbookresources.com/ 

-- New from Top Cow this July comes Rising Stars, a 24 issue maxi-series written by Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski, which deals with the repercusions of an alien power which grants super powers to the 113 residents of a small town.  With TNT cancelling Crusade, this may be just the ticket for that JMS fix. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- Awesome Entertainment has unveiled Lionheart, a new mini-series by Coven creators Jeph Loeb and Ian Churchill which "chronicles the saga of an ancient power that has been handed down throughout the ages, and the woman who now shares its amazing properties."  The new series is set to debut at this summer's Wizard World '99 convention in Chicago, with a direct market release a few weeks later.  In other Liefeld news, Satan must have been ice skating this week because Rob is heading back to handle the creative chores on Cable, a character he co-created during his glory days with Marvel. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- On the Image front, Chris Eliopolous's Desperate Times has been cancelled with issue #4.  Issues #5 and 6, which have been solicited, will not ship.  Eliopolous has plans to bring the series back as a self-publishing venture, however, a move which will save him money (he won't have to pay a cut of the profits to Image) in the long run.  He's also looking into syndicating the strip nationally in the newspaper market. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/newsarama/index.html 

-- Stan Lee Media Inc. has hired three new executives to help flesh out his new on-line superhero venture.  Dana Moreshead, previously executive director of creative services for Marvel Entertainment, joins as vice president of creative services; Ken Hoin, formerly senior producer for Disney Online, is now executive producer for StanLee.net; and film/television/interactive writer Buzz Dixon joins the company as vice president of creative affairs. 
http://www.detnews.com/comicbooks/ 
http://www.stanlee.net 

-- Former Disney Adventures editor and co-founder of the Friends of Lulu Heidi MacDonald has been appointed the new editor of DC's Warner Bros and Cartoon Network properties. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- Yet another indy comic creator turns his attention towards kid-focussed media as James Kolchalka (aka Jimminy Kroekel) debuts two songs/videos on Nickelodeon's popular Kablam!.  The first, "Hockey Monkey," aired on February 26th, while the second and more "loony" song "Pizza Rocket" will appear on the March 12th episode.  Kolchalka's most recent comic related work, Monica's Story, an illustrated version of the Starr Report, was released last month. 
http://www.detnews.com/comicbooks/ 

-- ABC is attempting to ink a deal with Miramax and Touchstone TV for a 6 episode animated series based on Kevin Smith's Clerks.  If the deal goes through, the show could debut as a mid-season replacement next year. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- The syndicated TV series The Crow: Stairway to Heaven has been renewed for a second season. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- After years of legal wrangling, it looks like Sony Pictures Entertainment has emerged as sole owner of the rights to produce a Spider-Man feature film.  This opens the door to a Spidey movie actually being able to be made, and Sony seems to be hinting at the character's franchise potential.  Stay tuned. 
http://www.anotheruniverse.com/buzz/ 

-- The official Bernie Wrightson web site will begin selling Wrightson's original creature designs for the teen monster movie The Faculty over the web beginning March 6th.  Prices start at $150.00 though, so be warned this isn't for the casual collector. 
http://www.berniewrightson.com 

[Do you have a hot news tip or press release?  If you'd like to spread the word, please e-mail 
Matt Sommer.]

 
 
Tales from the front
 By Joe Linehan

Funeral for a Friend

DC has made what I feel is a regrettable decision to move their comic discussion message boards from AOL to the World Wide Web.   The boards were first founded about 5 or so years back under the guidance of Mike Leib.  I signed on to AOL in early 1995 myself, and I have to admit that the main reason I chose to do so was those advertisements DC used to run in their comics for DC Comics Online.  Since then, the area has changed greatly, yet I still can't feel a bit of a loss as the boards move.

I remember the first time I went into the DC chatroom.  I had no idea who anybody was, but I immediately sensed a definite community.  It wasn't long before I got to know great people like Kent Orlando (who has since moved onto fame as host of the terrific Cheeks the Toywonder site http://toywonder.simplenet.com), William Brackeen, Rich Morrisey, and a whole lot of other people -- many of whom I only knew by their colorful screen names.

I still remember when I met somebody who was as big a Starman fan as I was.  He was very happy to see that I had made some nice comments about the book in the message boards and in the chats.  My first reaction was, "nice guy, but I think he takes his Starman just a little too seriously."  It was only months later when he told me he was Tony Harris, the book's penciller.  All the times we had talked about Starman, he just assumed I knew.

There were conversations with pros just about every night.  From pleasant conversations with Pete Krause, Paul Jenkins and Scott Peterson, to weekly gabfests with Bob Rozakis, the conversations were always enlightening.  The conversations didn't always stay in the comic field either.  I know a fan that met his wife through the DC chatroom.  It was always a blast to hear inker Jim Amash's hysterical stories about baseball great Boog Powell.

The chatrooms were a great source for info too.  Whether it was Joe Casey and Gene Ha discussing Kingdom Come or Fabian Nicieza and Mark Waid discussing Heroes Reborn, if you kept your mouth shut and your eyes open, you could learn a lot.  Unfortunately, it didn't last.  Eventually, Mike Leib left and a new regime came in.  Chats that didn't stick to a strictly defined topic were ended.  Attendance in spontaneous chats dropped.  This policy was also applied to the message boards, and long-time posters fled.

Then, AOL started doing the free software thing.  Terrific new posters came on who also became great friends, but with them came a lot more trolls.  People started using the anonymity of AOL to insult people with greater frequency, and fights started breaking out with equally greater frequency.

I look at DC Comics Online move to the web as only the final death knell to what had once been something truly special.  The new site is poorly laid out, but not terribly offensive to look at.  Unfortunately, it hasn't been working right for the last 3 days and to use the board you pretty much agree to allow DC to give out your information to anybody they want.  I don't know that I can post there while respecting my own principles.

I'll probably start posting more regularly on the General Interest Comic Boards, but I will miss AOL's DC Comics Online area.  I'll probably miss it for what I once thought of it as, rather than as what it's become. 

Interested in contributing a column to Ginchy!?  Run your idea by Matt Sommer or Joe Lunday at SommerMatt@aol.com or LundayJoe@aol.com. 

 
 how ginchy! are we?

Send your letters to Ginchy! to LundayJoe, and feel free to write to the contributor whose work inspired your comments.

RWB7210@aol.com -

As I wait for the next issue of Ginchy! (which seems an awful long time in arriving, to tell you the truth ... ;), I reflect on the last Ginchy! I received, specifically on Austin English's wonderful interview with Spain. 

I had never heard of this man before, but after reading this extensive interview, I felt like I knew him better than 90% of the creators in comics - the only other place that I had seen such comprehensive interviews was in The Comics Journal, but with Ginchy! I don't even have to pay $6!  Rest assured, I will definitely be seeking out some of Spain's comics in the future.

Interestingly, there was an article in the newspaper the other day about a group of underground cartoonists, including Spain.  As is typical of the mainstream media's approach to comics the writer focused on the sex and violence of the underground comics and the spats between creators - not on, say, the fact these guys were striking out for creator rights or whatnot.  Sigh.  Anyway, it made me think of the Ginchy! interview, which was lightyears better.

Keep up the fabulous work, guys - and get the next issue out!  I'm going through withdrawl!

-- Ross Binder
Writer of FIRST IMPRESSIONS Comic Reviews

**********

[Ed.- Last issue, we ran a news item about Stan Lee's new internet-based business venture.]

Rembert@aol.com -

Am I the only one who thinks that Stan Lee's new venture seems based on the concept that the only way to make money with comic book characters is to license them out to games, video, tv, movies, figures, etc., and so the best bet is to give the comics away free on the Internet?

**********

[Ed. - Most of the mail we received responding to Ginchy! #41 was written in response to Joe Lunday's column "Putting the Story First."]

underw@ic.net

Hi-

Just wanted to comment on the very interesting op/ed piece in Ginchy! #41 . . .

<<<All of these issues should fall by the way side if you can just
de-contextualize a comic book for the time it takes to read it, and judge it on its virtues as just that, a comic.  That means ignoring the attendant baggage you bring with you, and taking the comic at its own face value.  >>>

Personally, I think that it's pretty much impossible to 'de-contextualize' a comic, especially, a modern superhero genre comic.  There is so much accumulated baggage in the form of continuity, design expectations, and even the basics of plot and dialogue that 'face value' means different things to different people.

<<<The above list indicates just a few of the variables by which many comic
fans choose what they will and won’t read, and while we’re all obviously entitled
to our tastes, I think it’s unreasonable to expect individual comics to serve any artistic agenda other than to tell the stories the creators intend, in the way that they intend.>>>

I'm not sure what you mean by 'artistic agenda.'  It's pretty easy to agree that the comics should tell the stories their creators intended, but I don't think it's unreasonable to expect certain 'agendas' out of different creators.  If I want cheap sensationalism, I'll read something like Lady Death.  But undead bikini-clad albino Playmates don't belong in Strangers in Paradise, and I don't think it would be unreasonable to expect that to be part of Terry Moore's 'artistic agenda.'

<<<By this I mean a comic should be judged by what the story itself has to offer, and by the story I mean the plotting/scripting/art gestalt.  Obviously, you can’t pre-digest most comics without buying them (and if you do, your local retailer really ought to revive the old “this ain’t a library” slogan), but you can at least experiment a bit within your budget.  We’re all prone to favor certain genres and styles, but that’s not what I’m talking about.  Rather, what concerns me is the setting up of specific, personal ‘rules,’ by which comics are expected to conform in order to even merit your consideration.>>>

But everyone has rules for how they entertain themselves, even if some of us are a bit more willing to bend them than others.  Ultimately, a decision to bend or break those rules almost requires someone else to show the way to a new form of entertainment, or a variant of our regular form we weren't willing to try.  It's naive to expect that someone who's only read Archie comics all their life will pick up Watchmen and suddenly be opened to the world of superheroes.  There is an entire history and vocabulary of comics behind something like Watchmen that needs to be understood and digested to fully appreciate it.

I agree wholeheartedly that it'd be great if readers could try to choke down their knee-jerk reactions to specific personal 'rules' (I'm a retailer after all . . .)  I think the rallying cry for everyone who agrees with me should be "give a friend a comic!"

<<<Because you should put the story first when you read, and look at elements of a comic in terms of how they serve the story, the overall package, rather than imposing criteria arrived at from outside the comic.  Jack Knight hitting someone on the head with a rock makes sense in the context of the story and premise of the book, and his not feeling remorse or having to face any consequences for that action makes sense in terms of the situation.>>>

Interesting idea, but remember that Jack doesn't live in a vaccuum.  Jack hitting that guy did make sense for Jack, but you can't castigate your store owner for not liking Jack for doing that.  Ideally, this should have been a forum for Jack and his dad to talk about the notion of expediency versus 'doing the right thing.'  It would have been an interesting source of conflict and it got glossed over.  Certainly not a reason to stop reading in my view, but I understand how a gentleman raised on the pulpier heyday of the Golden Age might have trouble with this newer, somewhat amoral stance from someone who has taken the name of a cherished icon of his youth.

This is, again, a situation where context is important. Your reading of that story was based on having consumed previous issues of Starman, so you understood the character of Jack as developed to that point.  Of course the 'issue' (pardon the pun) of whether a single issue of a comic, the entire run, or several issue story-arcs should be read and criticiszed as parts or a single unified whole is probably the subject of another entire column . . .  So you can't say you read the story as an individual unit, devoid of 'criteria outside the comic.'   But I do follow your point about the retailer not being able to see the new Starman as a seperate set of stories from the old Starman he knew.  That's the thorny part of these 50-year continuities. Sigh.

<<<Once again, put the story first - if Alan Moore’s Supreme carried a different name (and it easily could), wouldn’t you be interested in it, at least enough to pick it up once?>>>

Well, I picked it up anyway.  I think a lot of folks just hated Liefeld because he became a millionaire and started his own comics company without any discernible art skill just because he landed an X-Men gig.  Jealousy can be rough.

<<<While a certain amount of dissapointment is inevitable for fans of recent runs on these titles, liking the recent past of the Bat-titles and enjoying the present No Man’s Land run do not, by any means, have to be mutually exclusive pleasures.  This, more than any other current example I can think of, epitomizes what I mean by putting the story first.  That is, can you put aside all the attendant hype, all the behind the scenes politics, and actually read the books for the stories contained within?>>>

I don't think it's that easy.  Because if you liked Detective before, you now can't read it as its own entity, because of the tie-ins.  So, do you go to reading four or five books a month so you'll have a handle on Detective, or do you drop it?  This is not a decision based on story, but on economics and 'internal DC politics.'  This is particularly infuriating with Legends of the Dark Knight, the non-continuity Batman book that suddenly is jumping on the No Man's Land bandwagon.  'No Man's Land' is not a Batman book, and doesn't take place in the DC Universe.  Need proof? Check out what's going on in Hitman.  Quake?  Hunh?  Free fire zone?  The NML books are pretty good post-apocalypse stories if you deny the rest of the DC Universe exists.  But, you have to do that for the stories to work, and you also need a pretty good idea of what's going on in the Bat-mythology to understand most of it. (Hey!!!  Isn't Gordon married?  Why's Batgirl in a wheelchair?  Who's this Huntress chick?  Isn't she from Earth Two?  The Penguin *isn't* crazy?  And where's Bats' pal Clark Kent now that his city needs rebuiding, and why in the name of GOD didn't Bats call in every favor on Earth to get the Big Red S to testify before Congress?).  These are all legitimate questions that you may or may not know the answers to depending on how up on the Bat-books you may be.  I have been enjoying them as 'Elseworlds' stories.  They're well-written, and the little maps of who controls what territory give it a bit of a combat documentary feel.  But again, reading the books for the stories within requires me to decide which parts of the context I'll accept and which to ignore, because they don't make sense based on everything else I know.

<<<Obviously, we all have to have some sort of criteria for what we read, since
we all have a finite amount of money to spend on comics each week (and if you don’t, you still have a finite amount of time to dedicate to reading them).  But there’s a difference between letting arbitrary rules shape your reading, and actually following your taste.>>>

That's all taste is, though.  Arbitrary rules we set ourselves for what we like and don't.  I like baseball, but can't stand football.  Hate it.  Why?  Any one of a hundred reasons, but mainly some arbitrary set of rules I have in my head.  'Varsity Blues' might be a great movie but I'll never watch it.  Totally arbitrary.  Again, a willingness to try new things requires a support group that isn't going to give you a lot of flack for doing it ("What are you reading that for?"), or someone brave enough to pick up the $2.50 it takes to pique someone's curiosity on a new book ("Here, try this, it's on me.")

<<<Comic fans should embrace the diversity of this medium that they’ve chosen to devote so much of their time to, rather than arbitrarily defining a particular patch of it, sealing off more and more of the world around them.>>>

Absolutely correct.  But there's also a place for those who only buy Cerebus and nothing else.  Your retailer likes what he likes.  Why not grab that Starman he doesn't want and give it to your friend who watches Babylon Five, but has never bothered even picking up a comic?  He's the one you really want to preach to.

Thanks for the thought-provoking article!  Ginchy! remains one of the few e-mails I bother responding to!

**********

Ryan2009@aol.com -

Leave it to Joe to put things in perspective.  For several months now I have debated whether or not to cease buying the Super-titles.  And my reasons were much like what Joe put forth in his column, "I've been buying Superman for so long I cant stop now.  I always buy every Superman spin-off and mini!"  Spoken like the true fanboy I am.  But for some reason Joe's column offered a moment of clarity, and it appears I'm going to halt my Super-habit.  Many thanks to Ginchy! for saving me 15 odd bucks a month.

-Ryan White

**********

FrogStoner@aol.com -

<< de-contextualize a comic book >>

Huh?  What the f--- does "de-contextualize" mean?  Lose the 50 cent words & say what you mean.

[Joe Lunday responds - Just for the record, to 'de-contextualize' is to take something out of its context.  Probably not technicall 'a word' as it doesn't have its own entry in the volume I have beside me, but 'contextualize' most certainly is.  And presuming that most of our readers have some kind of familiarity with English language prefixes, you'd think it would be pretty easy to deduce (uh-oh, there I go again!) that 'de-contextualize' would be shorthand for 'remove from context.' 

Also, while I'd prefer to let detractors hang themselves with their own poor arguments, I have to say that I find it more than a little disheartening that some associate the use of any kind of vocabulary with not knowing what you're talking about or trying to say.  Rather, supposed "50 cent" words are tools to say exactly what you mean, and to do it in a precise rather than vague fashion, so I most certainly have said what I mean.]

**********

ianmcl@melbpc.org.au -

I've just been catching up on my old email, and I wanted to thank you for writing this column.  It sums up my own ideas on comics perfectly, and comes at a time when I've been reading a number of columns on various parts of the comics industry which made wonder either: (a) why the writer was reading comics at all; or (b) whether the writer had more than a few brain cells.

Thanks again,
Andrew

PART TWO:
 
 

shades of gray
By Austin English

Sometimes, this is a really frustrating industry to invest your time and money in. No, scratch that . . . not sometimes . . . quite often actually.  Case in point, this week, at my friendly neighborhood comic book store, my retailer relayed a fact, which I had become aware of quite some time ago, but refused to believe.

What was this piece of information you ask?  Not one less important than the demise of the ever diverse and always reliable Kitchen Sink Press.  (I contemplated titling this column, "Everything but the Kitchen Sink," but I'll spare you.)

Anyway . . . this is one of the many instances where I'm forced to shake my head, look across the racks of over-ordered X-Men comics, then at the under-ordered (but at least ordered at all, for gods sake!) Fantagraphics and Kitchen Sink comics . . . and wonder what the hell is wrong with this industry.

Of course, the sad part is, I know the answer.  I know what the problem is.  I know why quality doesn't survive in this medium . . . and I know why crap prospers.  I know why Kitchen Sink Press, a company that never ceases to put out great material, had to go under.  And to tell the truth, I think you know why . . . deep down inside.  We all know why, but we refuse to admit it.

The problem, my friends, is you and I.  The comic book fan community is to blame for the demise of Kitchen Sink.  We're to blame for the sad state of affairs our beloved artform has fallen into.  For some reason, the predominately adult fan base (I don't have any numbers on this, but when I go into the shop on Wednesdays, adults out number children by a large margin), doesn't want to make an effort to broaden its horizons.  For some reason, we like to sit back with our safe superhero books, and not check out what's at the cutting edge of comics.  Now, I don't want to give the wrong impression here.  I love superheroes, always have, always will. But too often, much too often, do I have conversations with adult comic fans saying ludicrous things like 'Yeah, well, I've heard a lot of great things about that title, but it's black and white so . . . I just can't get into it," or "Oh, that's just to weird . . . I can't follow the story."

I for one don't believe a word of that!  Anyone can get into a b&w comic, and as intelligent human beings, which I believe most of the comic reading public to be, we can follow a slightly abstract story.  Hell, if you can follow some Spider-Man dream sequence, you can follow Acme Novelty Library.  The point I'm trying to make here is this: it's not that we don't 'get' the kind of books Kitchen Sink is putting out.  It's that we're just too goddamn lazy to go out and give different kinds of comics a whirl.

Now, you're probably reading this, and saying "No!  You're wrong!  I read Kitchen Sink, I have broad horizons.  Lay off!"  Well, I can bet that it's just a few of you.  If a large cross-section of Ginchy! readers [our readership being a relatively diverse group of comics fans who obviously have access to e-mail - ed.] were actually buying Kitchen Sink publications, then Kitchen Sink would most likely not be so certain of it's own own demise.

So, you tell me.  Why is it that comic book fans are like this?  Sure, film and books have the same problems.  Godawful productions like Armageddon make more than In the Company of Men, or other movies of its ilk, but at least most well-reviewed films are wildly seen. Yes, I know films are seen on a larger scale then comics, but you don't see Miramax, a studio roughly analagous to Kitchen Sink, shutting down.  (True, they're owned by Disney, but I don't believe that Disney'd stick with a non-profitable studio.)

So why is it that comic book fans are so neglegent of quality material?  Why do we sit back and ignore a company like Kitchen Sink, which has been publishing Alan Moore's From Hell (one of the best comics on the market), and The New Adventures of The Spirit (which features a contributors list that includes, to name a few: Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons, Neil Gaiman, Paul Chadwick, Kurt Busiek, Eddie Campbell, Brent Anderson, and an occasional pinup up by Will Eisner (!), among others)?

Is it because there just aren't that many people buying comics in general?  Not enough people to sustain the mainstream, let alone the rest of the field?  Nahhh, if that's true, then why's Todd McFarlane got $3 million to buy Mark McGwire's home run ball?  Why are comics considered such a lucrative field for merchandising? Sure, there're fewer readers than there were 10 years ago, but there's certainly still a gigantic fan base.

It still all comes down to fan apathy.  Ginchy! reviews Fantagraphics, Drawn & Quarterly, and Kitchen Sink books all the time, as do many other fanzines and comics publications (except for Wizard, The Guide to Overhyped Comics), so fans are aware that such material exists.  Again, we fans just don't feel up to trying new things.

What do I need to tell you so that something like this won't happen again?  Should I say that Eightball is not only incredibly entertaining, but also engaging and thought provoking?  Should I say Acme Novelty Library is one of the best-drafted comics I've ever seen and beautiful to look at?  Should I say Debbie Dreshler is a wonderfully personal cartoonist, with a message that isn't phony or forced?  Should I say that Penny Century is (in the words of one of the guys at my comic store) "completely socially accurate"?  Should I say that Palookaville has all the charm of a harmless cartoon, but all the power of a forceful literary masterpiece?  I could go on, but there's somewhere I want to get with this.

Basically, what I'm saying is, I don't want what happened to Kitchen Sink happening to Fantagraphics and Drawn & Quarterly.  Both seem to be doing well, but I've learned to trust nothing in the comics industry.  Thus, I have a challenge: for all of you out there who have been considering trying something different, considering going to look at the covers to the left of the Marvel/DC bin, considering dropping comics altogether because what your reading no longer holds your interest, pick up anyone of the titles I just mentioned.  This way, all sides benefit. You try something new, your retailer sees that there is interest in those wacky "alternative" comics, the independent houses get a little more cash, and when you get right down to it, you get a great comic book.

And in the end, isn't that why we buy comics in the first place?  To enjoy them? Why not take a gamble and start enjoying a whole new world of comics?  You'll be doing yourself, and the rest of us, a huge favor.
 

 
 
REVIEWS 

Bone #35
Writer/ Artist: Jeff Smith
Cartoon Books
$2.95

A while back, I wrote a review on Bone #34.  The review wasn't entirely negative, but it wasn't glowing either.  I complained a little bit about the apparent downfall of the book's humor, citing the fact that it had become a bit more slapstick, and aimed more at Smith's younger audience.  Well, in Bone #35, Smith answers back in a strange but more then adequate way.  I'll get to how Smith did that, but first, a little backstory . . .

In the simplest terms, Bone is a fantasy story, but it's so much more then that.  It's a wonderfully written and drawn story about 3 cousins who find themselves mixed up in all sorts of strange and wonderful adventures, all after stumbling into a valley with an assortment of oddball, but interesting characters.  Currently, the story is in a critical phase, as Fone Bone and Smiley journey with Thorn to confront one of the book's most mysterious villains, The Hooded One, while a variety of other subplots come into play. 

It's quite a but for one issue, but for me, the true joy of reading #35 is the improvement over the previous issue.  As I said earlier, my problem with #34 is the overuse of slapstick, and the dip in the quality of Smith's humor.  Smith has remedied this problem in an odd way: he severely cut back on the gags in this issue, but when he actually did feel the need for one, he executed it perfectly.  He stops dropping jokes all over the comic needlessly, and yet still lets the true focus of the book be the humor. 

All the other elements of Bone shine as well.  Smith's art is as beautiful as it always is, and if you've never laid eyes on it, it deserves a close look.  Even more impressive is Smith's ability to handle so many plot developments, and still have the story be clear and enjoyable.  Bone is not a book that gets bogged down in continuity. 

Of course, the main reason I love this book so much is that it's returned to the greatness that I saw it in the first time I read it.  There's something to be said for a book that can give you the same feeling it gave you when you read the first issue, a feeling that a book like this doesn't come around very often, a joyful feeling as you read it.
A-
-Austin English

Hulk #1
Writer: John Byrne
Pencilers: Ron Garney and John Byrne
Inker: Dan Green and John Byrne
Marvel Comics
$2.99

In a surprising aesthetic turnabout, John Byrne uses economy to his advantage in Hulk #1, writing a simple, almost graceful Hulk story around Ron Garney's powerful imagery.  Probably the best work that I've read by Byrne since Batman/ Captain America, it's also the best work I've seen to date from Ron Garney, whose overrated Captain America caused such hoopla, and whose underrated Silver Surfer was so sorely overlooked.  To take the most obvious example, Garney's two-page spread on pages 2 and 3, wherein an eighteen-wheeler flies sideways into a house, is actually quite powerful, not something that can be said of too many of the similar action sequences in so many contemporary comics.

It's too early to see where this latest 'new direction' will take the perpetually transient character, but if this is taken as a return to his 'wandering hero' roots (circa the '70s), it's nowhere near as melodramatic or cliche as such a move might've been.  Most surprising of all, in a turn away from the soap opera norm of modern superhero comics, Byrne's story is injected with a bit of dream-like mystery, appropriate to what has always been, at root, a monster comic.  Definitely not as multifaceted as Peter David at his best, but certainly worth a look.
B+
- Joe Lunday

Inhumans #5
Writer: Paul Jenkins
Artist: Jae Lee
Marvel Comics
$2.99

It's clear that a book is more intelligent and literate than anything else on the shelves when the damned letters column reads like a series of eloquent, insightful essays.  Inhumans is so originally, lovingly, expertly created that no promo or recommendation can do it justice; it's so patient and passionate, subtle and engrossing that one can only fully appreciate its magic by experiencing it for his or her self.  Witty yet never silly, eloquent but never pretentious, Paul Jenkins' scripts are purring, burning beauties, perfectly suited to the richly detailed (though never cluttered), deeply shadowed (though lively and never melodramatic) landscapes and figures of Jae Lee (a plea to those who pity ignorant readers such as myself:  somebody please direct me to other titles Lee has worked on . . . and Jenkins, too, for that matter!)

For those readers who, like myself, knew nothing of these fascinating characters before this current volume began last Fall, Inhumans concerns the struggles -- some minor and mundane, others fantastic and overwhelming -- of an isolated, mythical breed of metahumans who keep their society hidden within a magically shielded island called Attitlan.  Each man, woman and child is a wonder like no other, a subspecies of one, living in peaceful seclusion and avoiding human concerns whenever possible.

Issue #5 presents the heroes with little choice but to interact with our inferior ranks, after a small band of rebellious Portuguese soldiers begins firing on the protective dome over Attitlan, in a seemingly doomed and ridiculous attempt at breaking into the island and destroying the Inhumans.  With one of his most clever and suspenseful scripts to date, Jenkins has found a clever and frightening method of making it actually all too possible for the humans to achieve their goal, and this issue draws to a close with the future of our lovely, mysterious creatures a terrifying and questionable thing, at best.  There is nothing on your pull list that can not be replaced with this magnificent title, so if you have yet to pick it up, stop procrastinating and do so immediately.  You may well be missing the greatest book on the shelf right now.
A+
- Monte Williams

The Lemon Kids Book One
Writer/ Artist: Steve "Ribs!" Weissman
Alternative Comics
$2.95

As much as I love a good indie-humor comics, sometimes I wish this tiny genre wasn't so insular and refined.  Take Steve Weissman's The Lemon Kids.  Working from an already odd premise, Weissman works in references to Speed Racer that most people with a comic book background will pick up on, and a sly, hysterical parody of Palookaville auter Seth, which only his target audience/ peer group will pick up on.  That said, the references are still quite funny, handled with the same surrealistic aproach as the wrestling and general show biz targets here. 

Weissman's Lemon Kids are cherubic advertising mascots who embark on promotional misadventures which may find them engaged in no-holds-barred wrestling one minute, and fired and fending for themselves in the harsh world of advertising the next.  As you might gather, The Lemon Kids is a little difficult to get a grip on on a conceptual level, but Weissman's frenetic little figures convey some kind of infectious enthusiasm that's hard to shake.  A weird one.
B
- Joe Lunday

Magic Whistle #3
Writer/ Artist: Sam Henderson
Alternative Comics
$2.95

Improvised absurdity at its finest, Sam Henderson's Magic Whistle is comic strip humor reduced to essentials.  Not really avant garde in its minimalism, Henderson's artwork is simple because it doesn't need to be anything more.  It's tempting to say that rather than deliver the predetermined aesthetic pleasures of, say, an Ernie Bushmiller line, that he instead detracts from the visual in order to make the jokes work harder.  But the visuals are a part of the humor - plants coming out of rear ends aren't just funny because they're an example of his silly imagination at work, they're funny because he draws them that way.  Combined with Henderson's eye for the akward moment, interest in pop culture so stupid and harmless that it's funny, and drop-on-a-dime gag timing, and Magic Whistle makes for one irresistable funnybook.
A-
- Joe Lunday

Mechanical Man Blues #1
Writer/ Artist: Tsukasa Kotobuki
Radio Comix
$2.95

As its first translated manga project, Radio Comix, known mostly as a publisher of "furry" comics and made up of many ex-Antarctic employees, has made a pretty safe choice.  The artist for this title served as character designer for Battle Arena Toshinden, the popular line of fighting games on the Sony Playstation, so they can use that as a marketing hook.  The art itself is clean and pretty highly detailed, with lots of screen tones, and it doesn't hurt that the female lead is drawn throughout wearing a "butt-floss" bikini with more cleavage showing than in a Victoria's Secret pictorial.  The story, too, is utterly conventional post-apocalyptic sci-fi, with a strong but silent android savior helping the humans fight the evil machine overlords.  What could be more mainstream?  Nothing, unfortunately.  Mechanical Man Blues suffers from being too average.  Manga readers, and well, sci-fi fans in general, have seen this story done before, and done better, many many times (see Viz's Battle Angel Alita).  There's nothing really bad about the book, but there's also nothing to separate it from the multitude of similar product on the shelves.  I believe this is set to be a mini-series though, so it may serve as an easy introduction into the manga world for the uninitiated, or as a quick fix for readers looking for a self contained sci-fi themed story.  Those looking for depth, on the other hand, should look elsewhere.
C+
-Matt Sommer

Mona #1
Writers/Artists: Tom Hart, Matthew Guest, Lorenzo Mattotti, Brad Johnson, and Harvey Kurtzman
Kitchen Sink
$4.95

If for nothing else, buy this book so I can read the second part of Matthew Guest's story.  I mean, there are plenty of other reasons to lay down $4.95 for this Kitchen Sink anthology book, but for god's sake, if I don't get to read part 2 of "I Sold My Soul to Satan" (more sophisticated then the name suggests), I'll go nuts! 

Of course, in all likelihood, not enough people will buy this book, and the inevitability of Kitchen Sink going belly up will become reality.  Mona #1 is probably the company's last release.  Great note to go out on, but still, what a shame.

Anyway, let's talk more about Mona.  Anthology books are hit and miss most of the time, with a few good stories, and a lot that are bad.  But I have faith in them, considering that one of my all time favorite characters, Paul Chadwick's Concrete, premiered in an anthology.  Let me tell you folks, this is a good one . . . even if it does have some clunkers.

In addition to a great Jaime Hernandez cover, the book leads off with a Hutch Owens story, by Tom Hart.  Hart, winner of the Xeric grant in 1994, is a wonderfully hilarious minimalist, who I'm vaguely familiar with, but I never took as much notice of him as I did with this story.  It's hard to categorize Hart's humor, because it doesn't rely on one-liners, or sight gags.  Still, it's unabashedly cartoony, and very dry.  This particular story focuses on Hutch Owens, a reoccuring Hart character, as he leads a third world country's population in a revolt against a notorious international soft drink corporation.  I can't really do Hart's work justice, but it's an amalgam of dirty jokes and sophistication, served up in a perfectly simple drawing style.

As if that weren't enough, Hart's gem is followed up by none other than . . . Harvey Kurtzman!  Kurtzman doesn't really need an explanation, so I won't blather on about him.

Then we get to the clunkers . . . only they're not really that bad.  "The Thinkers Secret," by Lorenzo Mattoti, is a beautifully conceived, dreamlike story.  Usually, free-weeling, airy stories such as this one are those I like the most, but this one was a bit too unfocused, and just lacked a good anchor to stabilize it.  If nothing else, it's a good contrast to Hart's story.  Nice art.

"King Bee," by J. Bradley Johnson, is a head-scratcher.  It's kind of a bizarre 3-pager about a crafty king bee, but I didn't really get much out of it.  I would've enjoyed it if I saw it in the Sunday paper, but it seemed kind of out of place among the company of these other stories.  (If anyone reads it and likes, e-mail me and tell me what was going on.)

The final entry in Mona #1 is the best.  "I Sold my Soul To Satan, Part 1," is just dripping with darkness, tension, anxiety, and incredibly expressive art.  Matthew Guest paints a thoroughly disturbing picture of teenage suicide in Dallas, among other things, as he tells the tale of a man going to the funeral of his old college buddy.  Stuck in the middle of this story is one with the title "Minimum Wage," which is a perfect companion piece.  Both stories succeeded in really disturbing me. . . . with their unflinchingly harsh dialogue, sickening pauses, and depressing subject matter.  To top it off, Guest uses a load of black ink to set the mood, along with painting honestly twisted faces.  Part of the greatness of reading Guest's story is the contrast to Mona's first story, the Tom Hart one, since both stories couldn't be more different.

So please, please pick this book up.  I really want to see what Guest has in mind for the next half of his graphic novel, and I for one, would love seeing an anthology of this caliber appear month after month, showcasing some of the best talents this industry has to offer.
A-
- Austin English

Planetary #1
Writer: Warren Ellis
Artist: John Cassaday
Wildstorm/ DC
$2.50

Okay, everyone got their #2 pencils ready?  Welcome to the CB-SATs (Comic Book Schoolastic Aptitude Test -ed.).  First question: Alan Moore is to Awesome as _________ is to Wildstorm.  Ok, ok, you got it.  The answer is C) Warren Ellis.  Just as Alan Moore seems to be the sole writer of anything that comes out of Awesome Comics these days, Warren Ellis pretty much *is* Wildstorm, handling writing chores on both Planetary and the upcoming The Authority (not to mention creator owned Transmetropolitan for parent company DC . . .)  I'm not much of a fan of Transmet's skin-deep moralizing and homogenized "fight the power" message, but Ellis' name served it's purpose here by getting me to check out a new #1 I probably wouldn't have bought otherwise.  After reading the book though, I'm still not sure if it was a worthwhile purchase.

First off, let me just get this out of the way: Cassaday's art is quite excellent here, and the simple fact that it worked so well is what allowed me to focus almost entirely on the writing . . . and the writing is exactly what i need to discuss in this review.

The basic set-up in issue one is the recruitment of a new "third man" into a mysterious global white-hat organization known as Planetary.  Elijah Snow is the new guy, a hundred year-old professional soldier-o- fortune/ societal outsider who's been there and done that all before.  Joined by bad girl/leader Jakita Wagner and "the drummer," a lunatic who can speak with machines, Snow's first assignment finds him investigating a newly discovered man-made structure burried within a mountain, which turns out to be the secret headquarters of a 1940s "hero" group led by none other than the legendary Axel Brass (a not so thinly veiled copy of classic pulp character Doc Savage, Man of Bronze), who, still alive, recounts the tale of a fateful day in 1945 when the world almost came to an end.  At least that's what it's about on the surface.  Rather than a straightforward adventure story, though, Ellis sems to be wandering into parable territory here, as the "pulp" hero brigade (Brass/Doc Savage, Tarzan, Fu Manchu, The Spider/The Shadow , etc) fight to the death to defend their "world" against an invasion of a not-so-thinly-veiled JLA.  Is Ellis trying to make a point about how superhero comics "killed" the pulp heroes of the 30's and 40's?  It appears so, yet he also takes a stab at the evils of a "multiverse", the damage caused by "retro-active continuity" and the absurdity of characters being "kept alive" year after year for no other reason than the whims of "the brain" (the comic companies themselves?). 

I will admit that this "twist" to the story really took me by surprise.  The rather pedestrian and cliched introduction left me flat, but my interest piqued with the introduction of the classic pulp heroes, making me wonder if Ellis was planning to take an angle similar to Moore's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.  Alas, it appears that they were only visiting.  Ellis' story as told did become something more meaningful than your average comic book story, and yet, as the first issue for a brand new "super" team, is this the appropriate venue for this critique on the industry?  An excellent one-shot, but it did little to make me care about the book's main characters themselves, as they are left with nothing to do here but sit around and listen.  Not exactly a brilliant strategy.  As a stand-alone story, I'd rate it higher; but as it stands:
B-
-Matt Sommer

Robin #63
Writer: Chuck Dixon
Penciler: Staz Johnson
Inker: Stan Woch
DC Comics
$1.99

Robin has many admirable mainstream values that win it points with those looking for Quality Comic Books (i.e., superhero comics that don't make self-conscious people feel ashamed).  Realistic portrayal of teen growing pains isn't terribly hard to come by in comics, or superhero comics especially.  But Chuck Dixon's knack for earthy dialogue has won him many fans for the two Bat Jr. books which he steers, with Nightwing usually the favorite for its bounding dialogues, stylish artwork, and organized crime tales.  For Tim Drake, Dixon lets real-life kid problems like relating to parents, relating to father figures, moving, cliques, and responsibility shape the book.  And hey, Robin's girlfriend is pregnant!  I mean, who can't relate to that?  (Okay, okay . . . )

Unexceptional but very reliable in the substance department, what Robin is lacking is a conceptual hook, and maybe humor, too.  Like a lot of DC superhero comics, Robin is more meat-and-potatoes than sturm-and-drang, for which there's a lot to be said.  But at the same time, a book like this needs some kind of unique angle to really give it life; at this point it's just a solid comic book about a teen superhero, nothing more, nothing less.
B
- Joe Lunday

Interested in writing reviews for Ginchy!?  Contact Joe Lunday at LundayJoe@aol.com for more information.  (Submissions should adhere to the format used above, including letter grades, creators, company, and price information.)

 
 
part three:
 
 
Troy's Wild, wild World of Trivia
By Troy Nunis

Greetings Trivia fans, it's good to see you again.  We had a snappy turnout for last issue's game, and I hope a lot of you will join in the fun and send your guesses at each of the 5 questions, as well as the theme that links them together, to me at tnunroy@aol.com.  As ever, you can send any questions, complains, or comments to me at the same address.  Now, lets go trivialize . . . or something like that.

1) Who was the silver age flash married to?

2) What is the original Firebrands real name?

3)  Name the two known members of the Legion of Substitute Villains

4) What other names is Mark Scarlotti known as?

5) What disfigured opponent of Ghost Rider uses an opaque spheroid helmet to hide his face?

And now for last games answers:

1) His father was an enemy of the Titans who became an ally; he was a member of the Titans who became an enemy.
Joseph Wilson aka Jericho and The Wildebeast
 
2) This man has died several times, has been a real estate agent, a saxophonist, an agent of Chronos, and the father of an Avenger.  Who is he?
Arthur Douglas, aka Drax the Destroyer

3) Who was the star of Space Trek 2022?
Garfield Logan, aka, Beast Boy, Tork and Changeling

4) Who is Boston Brand's Brother?
Cleveland Brand

5) Which member of the Global Guardians is from Venezuela?
Bushmaster

With all due pomp and circumstance, we announce last issue's winner was Skippcomet, though trivia legend Bob Rozakis dropped me a knowing line early on in recognition of my using the tried and true U. S. President's theme.  So, unless I get impeached, I'll be back next issue with the answers to this quiz, and another batch of new trivia (is that an oxymoron?).  See ya there!
 

 
RAVES 
GINCHY!'s friends and contributors tell you about some things they like. 
 
Mitch Stephens (MrGrckl@aol.com) Raves

Preacher
What can I say?  It's my most anticipated read every month.  Ennis and Dillon are consistent every month, both story and art compliment each other.  It is on time, with no fill-ins, and they still manage to surprise me.

Flying Blind
The newest installment in the Nathan Heller series of novels by Max Allan Collins. Private detective Nathan Heller is always solving the "unsolvable" case, rubbing shoulders with the most amazing characters of this century.  This time it's Amelia Earhart.  The research that goes into these books is unbelievable.

The WWF
Vince McMahon is a genius!!  Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, Mankind, The Undertaker, Degeneration X, the closest thing to real super-heroes!

Top Rope Newsletter
The internet version of the monthly wrestling magazines, only it comes daily, with the hottest news and rumours about professional wrestling.

Goshen Dairy Chocolate Chip Ice Cream
It doesn't get any better than this.

Interested in contributing to Ginchy!'s Raves column?  Simply send in your praise for 5 things that you like (preferably in a variety of media, but don't constrict yourself) in the format used above, to Joe Lunday at LundayJoe@aol.com.  No use of the word "sweet."  Thank you.

 
 
 
LAST CALL 

To subscribe to GINCHY! e-mail Joe Lunday at LundayJoe@aol.com

Do you have a news item or press release? Mail them to Matt Sommer at Mateo@execpc.com or SommerMatt@aol.com

If you'd like to see any back issues of GINCHY! (and we're building up quite a 
library these days), we now have them archived on the web!  Point your browser 
toward http://members.aol.com/sommermatt/ginchy1.htm
 
If you would like to be be taken off our GINCHY! subscription list, you're 
changing e-mail addresses, or have accidentally received two copies of this 
week's issue, notify Joe Lunday at LundayJoe@aol.com

Do you have a friend that you think might be interested in receiving GINCHY!? 
Forward a copy to him or her and have them personally request to be added to 
our mailing list. 
 
# # # # # 

Editors: Joe Lunday and Matt Sommer 

Ginchy! #42 has been brought to you by: 

Austin English - Three1145@aol.com 
Joe Lunday - LundayJoe@aol.com 
Joe Linehan - AirwaveIII@aol.com
Troy Nunis - TNunRoy@aol.com 
Matt Sommer - mateo@execpc.com
Monte Williams - Curse44@aol.com

 

Back to main page