---EMF Shielding

 Symptoms

 Children

 Shielding

  RF Metres

 Video/Books

 WIFI

  PHONE Shields

 HUMAN Shielding

 FABRIC Shielding

 CLOTHING Shielding

BUILDING
Shielding

  Computer
MONITORS

 Industry :
 CellPhone Shields   Hospital Shielding   Space
note: This is NOT an Advertisement web site, All products mentioned here are for REVIEW purposes only.
If you know of something that should be on this list of RF Shielding products - either good or bad -
please let us know about it. All REVIEWS mentioned are opinions of the various Users / Testers.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - Updated - March 5 2004

 

INTRODUCTON : Shielding


 

There is often confusion when it comes to RF Shielding.

Some dont know it even exsists, and those who do dont know where to buy it, and those who do, are not sure if it even works before they buy it. It seems like a Home Business bonanza for those who are trying to make a living off the internet - but what are they selling to us? Has it been tested?

What is the INDUSTRY using, they for sure would want the real thing, so why isnt the public getting its hands on the stuff that really protects us? or are we. Just because its silver painted or silver metal does not nesecarily mean that its the right combination to shield you. And the Foam tabs, thats another story.

Please read up on all the things available, and make a note that there are different categories


BBC Monday, 11 June, 2001, 11:54 GMT 12:54 UK

Mobile firms patent 'Brain Shields'
Mobile companies have patented "protection" devices

Mobile phone companies have been developing their own devices to reduce the amount of radiation absorbed by the brain.
The industry's official line is that there is no proven link between mobile phones and health problems.
However, patents unearthed by US campaigners suggest that the biggest companies - Nokia, Ericsson and Motorola, have been working on
"protective" devices for a large part of the last decade. The earliest application found was dated from 1993.

Two Nokia patent applications, filed in 1995 and 1998, seen by BBC News Online, admit that, in the "worst case", it has been suggested that
malignant tumours could develop.

While this has not been scientifically verified, says the patent application, the "uncertainty" is affecting the "speed of growth" of the mobile market.

The documents emerge at a time when mobile phone companies are facing legal actions by people claiming their health has been damaged by mobiles.
Law firms in the UK have also been approached by former mobile users who want to sue.Simon Best, editor of a newsletter called Electromagnetic Hazard
and Therapy, which features articles discussing a possible threat to health from mobiles, says that the companies may be preparing in case they are forced
to provide such protective devices with every new mobile.

He told BBC News Online: "The strong suggestion is that they were aware of possible problems.

"Legally, they are in a cleft stick over this one - they have been denying there is a problem for so long, yet at the same time they have been developing these."
A spokesman for Nokia said: "Patenting innovations is standard practice for all aspects of technology within the industry and antennas are no exception to this rule.
"Nokia is continuously striving to improve all aspects of its product design."
A spokesman for Motorola said: "The safety of our customers is of paramount importance.
"The innovations in the patents address the design, performance and efficiency of our products and were not motivated by concerns about potential health issues."

A spokesman for the Federation of the Electronics Industry, which speaks on behalf on mobile phone companies in the UK, said that there was no proven link
between mobile phones and ill health. "The balance of scientific evidence to date suggest that mobiles - operating within international exposure guidelines -
don't cause adverse heatlh effects."

Major studies into the issue are underway across the world, with the UK government launching a £7.3m probe - part funded by the industry.

No evidence
A recent British Medical Association report suggested that there is no evidence that mobile use is cancer-promoting. However, the official government
advice is still precautionary, with parents advised to minimise the amount of time their children spend talking on mobiles, as their developing brains are
thought to be more vulnerable.

CELL PHONE USERS : Shielding Products, Do they really block PHONE EMF?


  - The Internet is constantly selling Radiaiton Shielding for CELLPHONES.

Are any of these items worth trying? Do they ABSORB the EMF from the Battery and the Antenna on the cell phone?

Some companies have been SHUT DOWN due to false claims that they work, when they do not.

Do your homework before leaving your health upto a TINY piece of foam.
If they did work, would there not be large foam shields on towers and homes? Why are they not there?

PHONE SHIELDS

 WaveShield

Product : WaveShield
www.waveshieldamerica.com
 Pros  -
 Cons

 SHUT DOWN DUE TO FALSE CLAIMS

 AegisGuard

Product : AegisGuard
www.
 Pros  -
 Cons  -

 ADR TABS

Product : ADR
www.AderMark.com
 Pros  -
 Cons  -

 La Shield

Product : La Shield
www.lashield.com
 Pros  -
 Cons  -

 MicroShield

Product : MicroShield
www.microshield.co.uk
 Pros  -
 Cons  -

  Aulterra Neutralizer

Product: Aulterra Neutralizer
www.emfdefense.com
 Pros  -
 Cons  -

  FTC SHUTS DOWN WAVESHILED
 

Vancouver BC

Carrie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds the official spokespersons of Microshield Technologies.Watch for Debbie Reynolds to appear on "Oprah", 20-20 and the Tonight show.

The Aulterra Neutralizer™ is the Only Product that NEUTRALIZES Harmful Effects of RF/EMF Exposure!


www.waveshieldamerica.com

http://www.comcom.govt.nz/publications/display_mr.cfm?mr_id=1218

Company prevented from selling
'Wave Shield' mobile phone protection device ­ Fined $4,000

Media Release 2003/13
Issued 1 August 2003

A company claiming that its 'Wave Shield' mobile phone radiation protection device blocks up to 97% of electromagnetic radiation from the inner ear has been permanently prevented from marketing the product and convicted on four breaches of the Fair Trading Act. The Commerce Commission sought permanent injunctions against Waveshield (New Zealand) Limited to prevent the company from advertising and selling its product. The company consented to these injunctions in May this year. Fines on the criminal convictions totalled $4,000 plus costs with company director Miles Dixon being personally liable for $2,000 of these.

Director of Fair Trading Deborah Battell said that the results of the Commission's actions have real benefits for consumers, protecting them from wasting their money on a product that doesn't work.In its investigation, the Commission obtained expert evidence asserting that these types of devices do not provide any significant protection from electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones.Ms Battell said that the experts advised that electromagnetic radiation is emitted from the entire body of a mobile phone, in particular the antennae.

"A small patch of shielding material would not prevent a reduction of up to 97% as claimed, as the radiation waves would simply go around the patch, and would not, in any case, only be absorbed through the inner ear," she said."Even if the Wave Shield device was effective, the experts advised that there is no scientific or medical reason to believe that it would confer any benefit to a user as there are no proven health risks associated with mobile phone use," Ms Battell said.

The Commission was concerned that the company was not only making false and misleading claims about the efficacy of the product, it was also promoting the fact that the device had been 'tested' and is 'proven'."The test results posted on the Waveshield website to substantiate the claims made in the advertising are not recognised as scientifically credible by experts in the field," Ms Battell added.

In sentencing in the Christchurch District Court yesterday, Judge Erber noted that Mr Dixon knew that the device was being questioned by the US authorities yet carried on with the sale of the product. He also commented that the defendants were acting as 'snake oil merchants'.

"The Commission will continue to take legal action against businesses that take advantage of consumers by making pseudo-scientific claims that are difficult for consumers to prove or disprove," Ms Battell said. <snip>


FTC Shuts Down 2 RF Shield firms
RCR NEWS February 25, 2002
By JEFFREY S


WASHINGTON - Motorola Inc., the nation's top cell-phone manufacturer and a defendant in several brain-cancer lawsuits,
collaborated with the Federal Trade Commission in probes that led to enforcement actions announced last week to shut down two firms that market radiation-protection devices for cell phones.

C.K. Chou, Motorola's top radio-frequency radiation engineer, said he shared information with FTC staff, including an
abstract of a study he conducted on seven radiation shields. The research, presented at a conference last June in St. Paul, concluded none of the radiation shields worked. After announcing FTC lawsuits against Stock Value 1 Inc., of Boca Raton, Fla., and Comstar Communications Inc., of Sacramento, Calif., at last
Wednesday's press briefing, J. Howard Beales III, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, stated: "According to
the government scientific agencies, there is no evidence that the radiation emitted by cell phones poses any health hazard to people, but
additional studies are ongoing." He attributed that view to the Food and Drug
Administration and General Accounting Office.

However, neither agency has made such a blanket statement, at least not without strong qualifiers. While both agencies say much research has yet to link cell phones to brain cancer, they add there is not yet enough information to conclude that mobile phones do not pose a risk to the nation's 131 million subscribers. Indeed, some studies have found genetic damage, increased tumors in lab rodents, memory impairment, eye cancer and other biological effects from radiation near or at energy levels given off by mobile phones.

Norman Sandler, director of global strategic issues for Motorola, said the firm has been active on several fronts in confronting firms that claim their products reduce mobile-phone radiation. Sandler said Motorola welcomed the FTC's action. Our conclusions were based solely on the information from the two companies,"
said Serena Viswanathan, an FTC staff member who worked on the investigation.

The FTC filed suit Feb. 13 in Florida and California federal courts against Stock Value 1, which sells the "SafeTShield"
and "NoDanger," and ComStar, which markets "WaveShield," "WaveShield 1000" and "WaveShield 2000."

The FTC said the two companies claim their products block up to 99 percent of radiation from cell phones. "These companies are using a shield of misrepresentation to block consumers from the facts," said Beales. Beales said attempts to reach settlements with the two firms were unsuccessful. Beales said the two cases were referred to the FTC by the Good Housekeeping Institute, whose laboratory tested the radiation shields and found they were largely ineffective.

Beales said the radiation shields-by interfering with the radio transmission-may actually
increase consumers' exposure to radiation because it forces the phone to increase power to lock onto a signal.


Additional FTC investigations of radiation shield makers are in progress, but Beales did not provide details. He said the agency knows of no company whose product curbs mobile-phone radiation. Mobile-phone firms themselves have patents to reduce radiation. A woman who identified herself as a receptionist for Stock Value 1 said the owners of the company are out of town. Calls seeking comment from Comstar were left on the company's answering machine and not returned.

The FTC's crackdown against sellers of radiation shields was announced a week before an $800 million cell phone-cancer lawsuit moves into a critical stage.

Today begins a week-long hearing in Baltimore federal court on the admissibility of scientific experts and their
research in the biggest health challenge faced by the mobile-phone industry to date. At least one scientist testifying for the plaintiff-Dr. Henry Lai of the

University of Washington-has financial ties to theradiation-shield industry. News of the FTC probe,
coming on the eve ofthe case, could hurt Lai's credibility in the courtroom.

 

GENERAL PUBLIC : Shielding Products, Do they really block ANTENNA EMF?


 - Late night Television Infomercials are constantly selling Radiaiton Shielding or Energy Ballancing devices.
Are any of these items worth trying? Do any of these items ABSORB the EMF from nearby cell towers and cell phones?

Do people that know they are EMF sensitive actually buy these items or is it people who dont know what emf is and they try them and think they are cured and ignore the emf problem.

We will review what we know about the products, and be open to any email that comes in from EMF sensitive people who have tried any one of these products. We are not trying to sell any of these but rather Investigate once and for all EMF sensitive people.

 

Human RF Shields


 Bio Tape

Product : Bio Tape
www.TVBIOTAPE.com
 Pros  easy to wear
 Cons  have to Replace it

 Ionized Bracelette

Product : Q-RAY Braclette
http://www.qray.com/
 Pros  easy to wear
 Cons

Does not shield your Brain

 Necklace Charm

Product : Q-Link Pendant
www.emfdefense.com/Pendant
 Pros  easy to wear
 Cons

Witnesses say it Doesnt work at all

 Life Field Polarizer

Product : Life Field
www.bewisepolarize.com/..polarizer--
 Pros  - no review yet -
 Cons

 - no review yet -

 ElectroShield

Product : ElectroShield
www.emf-pollution.com
 Pros  - no review yet -
 Cons

 - no review yet -

 Dark magnetic sheet of tape, precut to strips, can cut with scissors to fit.

Recomended to go on skin for direct ballancing effect

 

 

 

 
Life Field Polarizer

 
Personal Field Polarizer

FABRICS - Nickel, Copper, Iron


-----------BBC NEWS : " Nickel Curtains Protect agains Mast " - July 2003

-----------EnergyFields : " Nickel Curtains Protect agains Antennas " - VIDEO : Sage on "Public Exposure"

-----------LessEMF : www.lessemf.com/fabric.html

 Shieldron

Product : Shieldron Fabric
www.Shieldron.com
 Pros

  REDUCED
TO ZERO
 Cons

  Must order in High volume

MU METAL

Product : MU Metal
www.cutcat.com
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons   Expensive

Product : FaraBloc
www.farabloc.com
 Pros

  MED - HIGH
Protection-
 Cons

Expensive

 

Product :  Strech CF
www.lessemf.com/fabric
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons   - no review yet -

 

Product :  Silver Mesh
www.lessemf.com/fabric
 Pros

HIGH
Protection
 Cons

None

A textile Fabric coated with 1/1000milimeter of copper and additional nickel layer.  This layer prevents oxidation of copper. Textile can be polyester, acryl nylon, or silk.  Inner copper coating can also be gold, silver, aluminum.  Better conductive material will have a better shielding effect.

See : Euclidgarment

See : PublicExposure

Mu Metal is the generic name for for a high-permeability, magnetically "soft" alloy used for magnetic shielding.

It includes about 80% nickel and 15% iron, with the balance being copper, molybdenum or chromium, depending on the recipe being used. All shielding materials work by diverting the magnetic flux to themselves.

FARABLOC
211-3030 Lincoln Avenue
Coquitlam, British Columbia
Canada V3B 6B4


Tel: 604-941-8201
Toll Free: 1-866-941-4711
Fax: 604-941-8065

STRETCH CONDUCTIVE FABRIC

"All The Conductivity Of Silver With Lycra-Like Stretch"
This medical grade Silver plated 92% Nylon 8% Dorlastan fabric offers the unique ability to stretch in both directions. Can be used for stretchy hats, socks, gloves, or other garments. Highly conducutive. er and additional

 HIGH PERFORMANCE SILVER MESH FABRIC

"60dB in a Mesh Your Can See Through" For maximum shielding perform-ance in a mesh fabric. Surface resistivity is 60dB from 30 MHz to 3 Ghz! Can be used over a wide range of temperatures (-30° to 90°C) to shield electronic components, make draperies, tents, garments, mobile phone shields, and more. Very soft and comfortable to touch.

Clothing (using above FABRICS)


--------BBC - " Levis to sell Mobile Phone Safe Jeans " - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2255376.stm

--------RAW Clothing (UK) - Clothing Protection Factor - CPF testeing - Are you protected?

--------Thermal Flow Ceramic Fabric - " Fabrics that radiate far infra-red " - http://www.mpphealth.com/thermoflow.htm

--------EMF Cocoon - " Shielded sleeping-bag for Army " http://www.singingmountain.org/y1998sep13.html

--------EMF Pocket Shield - For those cell users who put phones in thier pockets - www.rfsafe.com

Product : EMFShield
www.zipmall.com/emfshield
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons  - no review yet -

Product : SafeGuard
www.lessemf.com/
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons   - no review yet -

Product : Handy Fashions
www.handy-fashions.com/
 Pros   - no review yet
 Cons

  WEB-ORDERS ONLY..

 

Product : Hat
www.lessemf.com/
 Pros

  Excellent
 Cons

  Need to add Styles/Colours, Double Layer

Product : Shirt
www.lessemf.com/
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons  - no review yet -

The EMF Shield is comparable in concept to the vest worn during dental X-rays, which protects covered areas of the body from radiation.

EMF Shield Apron Features:
Blocks EMF emissions Meets OSHA Regulations Compact and Lightweight (4 ounces) Affordable - only $24.95 (includes U.S. shipping)

The EMF Shield is available at participating Wal Mart stores.

ARGY Enterprises P.O. Box 940728
Plano, TX 75094-0728 ..or Call:
1(800) 231-8701 and ask for Ray Wells.

Safe Guard Apron

Washable cotton based fabric which is a highly effective E-field & RF shield

 Cap, Waistcoats, Scarfs

Our Mobile Cap was tested by the governmental radiation protection center in Finland (STUK). These tests confirmed that a person who is using the Mobile Cap during cell phone communication, is protected against phone radiation by 80%. To reach a 99,999% protection, the whole body had to be covered with our material. Seen from this perspective, the values for the Mobile Cap are excellent. The results where published in the largest newspaper in Finland "Helsingin Sanomat" in January 2003.

Protect your brain from RF (radio-frequency) pollution with this handsome baseball style hat. Specially designed to shield the head from frequencies from below AM through microwave, including cellular phone frequencies. Lined with sophisticated NaturaShield fabric woven from cotton with an ultrathin Silver/Copper core thread for excellent radiation protection. This gives this unique fabric a truly comfortable, natural feel and the durability and washability of cotton, but with exceptional reflective characteristics. Very sheer, comfortable undergarments you can wear over your regular underwear to shield yourself from powerline and computer electric fields, and microwave, radar, and TV radiation. This silver-plated, stretchable, washable nylon mesh is electrically conductive. It provides EMF radiation protection by reflection. Plus you won't get those static shocks as you used to in dry weather and your clothes won't cling to you! Fabric provides up to 35dB of shielding at 100 MHz. Made in USA. Surround what you want to protect!

ShieldWorks

Product :  ShieldWorks
www.ShieldWorks.com
 Pros

Cap, Vest , Sheet, T-shirt, Sweatshirt
 Cons   - no review yet -

No Zone

Product : No Zone Clothing
www.NoZone.ca
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons   - no review yet -

Product : Faraday Canopy
www.lessemf.com/personal
 Pros

  MID to HIGH
Protection
 Cons   - no review yet -

Product : NaturaShield
www.lessemf.com/fabric
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons  - no review yet -

Product :
www.
 Pros   - no review yet -
 Cons  - no review yet -

" Right Now youre bathing in 8000 cellular phone calls, 30 bad talk shows, 43 radio stations you despise, and emissions from a leaky monitor. "

 

May not be in business anymore

 

UV Protective Funwear

Victoria BC

 

Finally, a "Faraday Cage" type enclosure to completely shield yourself from E-field radiation so you can sleep peacefully at night. No need to worry about hidden power lines emitting electric fields from walls, ceilings, or floors--you're surrounded by radiation protection! This simple canopy, made with an extremely high grade conductive silver/nylon fiber, provides you with an E-field shielded environment so you can rest while minimizing the negative effects E-field can have on brain function, melatonin production, and other body functions.

Fabric which is gentle to the skin, has a great feel, and still provides 25-35 dB from 200 MHz to 3,3 GHz according to independent test results.

Perfect for bedding, clothing, drapes and most other applications where you want conductivity or microwave shielding without the harshness of metallized fabrics.

Completely machine washable

 

BUILDINGS: Shielding people who are very close to Radiation


 

http://www.vitatech.net/

http://www.vitatech.net/magnetic_shielding.html

http://www.emfshielding.com/services_index.htm

 


BUILDING SHIELDINGwww.magnetic-shield.com/
www.magnetic-shield.com/products/shielding.html

 

http://www.emfdefense.com/Ally.htm

 

INDUSTRY : Shielding for Employees who are very close to Radiation


 

MEDICAL : Shielding for Patients and Staff


----------CatScan - LED VEST
----------Dentist X-RAY - LED VEST

SPACE INDUSTRY : Shielding for Staff


----------Dont leave Home without it. Since a minor about of people go there, why spend all this money on suits?
----------So they can go there safely.

----------NASA uses a thin Gold foil
----------http://www.lessemf.com/images/a278.jpg

----------http://radiationshielding.nasa.gov/facilities.html

 

TELECOM INDUSTRY : Shielding for Staff



 

 

RF / HF Nickel Suits - EUCLID GARMENTS
http://www.euclidgarment.com
http://euclidgarment.com/KWBrochure.pdf
http://euclidgarment.com/Tutorialpics/suitpose1.jpg


Tower Techinitians / Electricians have
the HIGHEST Suicide Rates
http://www.mercola.com/2000/aug/13/suicide_emfs.htm


http://www.niehs.nih.gov/emfrapid/html/WGReport/Chapter45.html

gigaherz.ch - FORUM

German Telekom AG uses HF protective clothing
in the area of its transmission radio stations as
preventive measure against high frequency electromagnetic fields!

Author:  neo   date:    18.03.02 22:32

The German Telekom AG uses HF protective clothing in the area of its transmission radio stations as preventive measure against high frequency electromagnetic fields!

Source: Safety engineer (2001) H. 2, P. 16 - 2;
Safety engineer 32 (2001) NR. 3, P. 28-33;
Authors: Heinrich, Wolfgang; Braatz, refuge

Why only does the German Telekom schutzanzuege begin, if the radiation performance of a BTS is smaller nevertheless, as the total output of headlights of only one Kfz??
Light is nevertheless also electromagnetic radiation!
Obviously Nokia does not only know that the microwave radiation of the portable radio
pulsed digitally causes cancer!

RH: German Telekom AG uses HF protective clothing
Author:   Rainer   date:    26.03.02 18:24


www.sitesafe.com

www.ipeoplesafe.com

 

Effects on the Body


  See SENSITITY

 

Conclusion


Have YOU Tested any of these products?

Please write In and let us know what you experienced

Your personal information, such as your Name or Email will NOT be published.

Finding out which products are the Best to use is the Goal.

Please dont hesitate, this could help other people if you know
about a product that actually reduces EMF exposure.

Companies that want to promote thier products,
this isnt the place, unless you are 100% sure that it works - and have the facts to back that up.

For the makers of products that do not work, they will be forced to improve thier design and start protecting people from EMF Radiation or leave the market and let the ones that work serve the public that needs protection from EMF.

WHY are these companies who make "shielding products"
NOT CONTACTING EMF SENSITIVE PEOPLE to do thier product testing?

They cant say we are hard to locate, There are dozens of groups
in Europe alone and more world wide, if you want to be sucessful, test it on YOUR FOCUS MARKET that really needs it, and will tell you if it works or not. You see many companies dont care if it works or not, they just want to make a profit. Well those companies are being weeded out. Companies, if it doesnt work - we just wont buy it. To the ones that win this compition, congradulations in advance.

 

one more thing....the computer you are using, is the monitor safe?

COMPUTER SHIELDING - Video Display Terminal, Cathod Ray Tube


www.bewisepolarize.com/radiation%20harmful.htm

VDT's first came under suspicion in the late 1970's and early 80's, when a dozen or so unexplained clusters of miscarriages and birth defects were found in groups of women who worked with computers.

In one group of computer operators at Sears in Dallas, eight out of 12 pregnancies ended in miscarriage or neonatal death. In 1988 the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program did a study of 1,583 California women who worked 20 hours or more in a week with VDT's stood an 80 percent greater chance of miscarrying than women who did similar work without VDT's.

www.pulsedclean.com/research.htm

www.emf-bioshield.com

www.milligauss.com/

IMAGEGUARD CRT MONITOR ENCLOSURES
www.cutcat.com/page5.5.html#mu


http://ssec.org.au/emraa/html/computers.htm
EMRAA (Electromagnetic Radiation Alliance of Australia)
 
The Facts about Computers
 
Applying precautions

ACTU Guidelines The ACTU has developed Guidelines for Screen Based Work (May 1998) which is based on a policy of prudent avoidance. It recommends the following maximum emissions, measured at 50 cm from the VDU and 30 cm from the front of the screen:

* an electric field of less than 10 V/m at 5Hz to 2kHz
* an electric field of less than 1 V/m at 2 kHz to 400 kHz
* a magnetic field of less than 2 mG at 5 Hz to 2 kHz
* a magnetic field of less than 0.25 mG at 2 kHz to 400 kHz.

The policy also recommends purchase of VDUs with low electrostatic potential to
"prevent dust particles moving from the screen to the user due to differences in potential."

Swedish Union of Clerical and Technical Employees in Industry (SIF) The SIF has developed a policy of "Noll Risk" (No Risk) which aims to create workplaces and practices that are free from health risk. It aims to empower workers with knowledge and to encourage the design and manufacture of equipment that reduces exposure. 4

Industry Initiatives According to the SIF, in Sweden "Many companies are now changing their strategy. Instead of waiting for limit values or directives from the authorities, they are being proactive in meeting the increasing demand for environmentally-adapted products."
One such company is Ellemtel which has taken extensive action to reduce fields in its offices to accommodate the large number of electrically sensitive people in its employment. Fewer cases of electrical sensitivity were reported subsequently.

Low-emission monitors
As a result of negotiations between Swedish unions, consumers and health and safety bodies, a new emission level of 2.5 mG (milligauss) was decided upon. These low-emission screens are now in wide use throughout the world.


EFFECTS from COMPUTER MONITOR EMF RADIATION:

- BURNING on the SKIN

- BURPING & INTESTINAL PROBLEMS, see Symptoms of HyperSensitivity

- INTESTINAL CANCER, see link

- SORES on the HANDS, see link

 

EFFECTS from COMPUTER MONITOR --& --CELLULAR COMBINED:

- BURNING in the BRAIN

- LOSS OF CONCENTRATION

- Difficulty Concentrating

 

Suggested Action for EMF Sensitivite people:

- Get Flat Screen monitor to reduce exposure levels

- Never use cell phones near computers

- Get shielding for you, monitor, room or phone

- Avoid using cell phones indoors, use landlines ( phones with a cord )


  PHONE Shields

 HUMAN Shielding

 FABRIC Shielding

 CLOTHING Shielding

BUILDING
Shielding

  Computer & Monitors

 Industry :
 Cellular   Hospitals   Space

 

EMFC Main Menu