![]() |
|
The Horse's usual introduction goes
This horrific creature is a traditional
The introduction is suitably surreal
|
| The Hartley Horse has been part of the Hartley Morris
Mens performance for the past
30 years. The first Hartley Horse was made in the early 1970s, based on the description in the book on the Hoodening traditions written by Percy Maylem in 1909. The Horse takes part in our performance as an individual Character and collector, it also infills between dances. Occasionally the Horse will double as a fool chastising dancers by biting their bottoms if they go wrong. John Tatman has been known to dance Adderbury, Shepherds Hey in the horse, usually when there are a lot of children in the audience and he has had sufficient to drink not to remember the last time he tried it.
|
| Although based on the traditional Hooden Horse the Hartley
Horse has some differences
from the horse as used in the Hoodening plays. If you want to know more about Hooden Horses see Ben Jones's web site, I have put a link on the links page.
The main difference is that it is upright, the stick is short
and not used as a third leg, the The operator is usually a dancer with bells on and works the crowd independently or with the fool rather than as a character in the action. The jaw is long to allow the Horse to eat money. This rather changes the look of the head and it has been mistaken for a crocodile,
until properly introduced. The Hartley Horse being from the Hoodening traditions not the Morris dance traditions is different in character from the Hobby Horses which has a rider to interact with the audience [see the article on following pages on the Hobby Horse]. To explain the character of Hooden Horse it has been said that the Hoodeners simply used the horse to frighten people and then asked for money, a bit like Penny-for-the-Guy or Halloween today.
We have been known to perform a Horse play, usually called shooting the horse. |
Terry Heaslip says more about this on his page. This is a Death / Resurrection play
and is now traditional in that it has grown and evolved by word of mouth and is never
exactly the same. I understand that the play has been collected and reinterpreted by
other sides, which is how things remain alive and relevant.