|
Q: What is the Lunar eclipse
darkness measuring scale?
A: One of the simplest and most
telling total lunar-eclipse observations is
estimating the Moon's luminosity
value at various times during totality.
Early in the twentieth century,
the French astronomer André-Louis
Danjon
devised a clever five-point
scale for rating the darkness of a total
lunar
eclipse. The Danjon scale,
reproduced in Table 4.1, has since gone on to
become the standard by which all
total eclipses are judged.
Table 4.1
Danjon
Lunar Eclipse Luminosity Scale
(More informtion below
scale)
|
Danjon
rating
|
Darkness
|
description
simple
|
|
L = 0.0
|
Very dark
eclipse.
|
Moon almost invisible,
especially at mid-totality.
|
|
L = 1.0
|
Dark
eclipse
|
gray or brownish
coloration; lunar-surfacedetails distinguishable
only with difficulty.
|
|
L = 2.0
|
Deep red or
rust-colored eclipse
|
central part in the
umbra
dark, but outer rim of
the umbra relatively bright.
|
|
L = 3.0
|
Brick-red
eclipse
|
usually with a brighter
(frequently yellow) rim to the
umbra.
|
|
L = 4.0
|
Very bright copper-red
or orange eclipse
|
, with a
bluish,
very bright umbral
rim.
|
The Danjon scale should be used
to estimate the appearance of a total
eclipse only with the naked eye.
Surprisingly, the often-subtle colors of
a total eclipse tend to fade as
magnification increases. The late Joseph
Ashbrook suggested that this
might be due to a reduction in surface
brightness to near or below the
threshold for color perception.
Although Danjon devised the
scale to fit every lunar eclipse, it is rare
for an eclipse to match one of
his descriptions exactly. Instead, most
seem to fall somewhere between
two values - therefore, so should your
estimate. For example, at
mid-eclipse, if the Moon appears a muddy-clay
color highlighted with a bright,
almost yellow rim, then the Danjon
luminosity value would fall
somewhere between 2.0 and 3.0. After
carefully
examining the Moon's appearance,
judge which description it most resembles,
then prorate the value
accordingly. In this case, a luminosity value
of
2.4 or 2.5 would seem most
appropriate. Astronomical magazines always
encourage readers to send in
their observations and reports, but to be of
real value, always include your
time, location, instrument used, if any,
and a description of the sky
conditions.
A less-often quoted rating
system was introduced in 1924 by Willard J.
Fischer. The Fischer scale uses
a three-point strategy based not on color,
but instead, on the amount of
surface detail visible through various
instruments. Table 4.2 offers a
summary.
Table 4.2
Fischer Lunar Eclipse
Scale
Grade Description
2 The naked eye sees "spots" on
the eclipsed Moon, and the seas and
other detail can be seen with
hand instruments (small binoculars and field
glasses)
1 Instruments of 5 cm (2 inches)
up to 15 cm (6 inches) are necessary
to show detail on the eclipsed
surface.
0 Apertures greater than 15 cm
(6 inches) are needed to see surface detail.
Phil Harrington
Author: Eclipse!
http://www.philharrington.homepage.com
top
|