“I’m sure we will emerge here with the strongest
ticket in the history of the Libertarian Party,” Barr stated in his victory
speech shortly after being selected as the Party’s nominee. “I want
everybody to remember that we only have 163 days to win this election. We
cannot waste one single day.”
“We’re proud to present to the American voters Bob
Barr as our presidential nominee,” says Libertarian Party spokesperson
Andrew Davis. “While Republicans and Democrats will fight for their own
power in November, Libertarians will fight for Americans. Bob Barr is one of
the strongest candidates in the Party’s 37-year history, and we look for him
to have an enormous impact in the 2008 race. Republicans and Democrats have
good reason to fear a candidate like Barr, who refuses to accept the
‘business-as-usual’ attitude of the current political establishment.
Americans want and need another choice, and that choice is Bob Barr.”
The Libertarian Party is America’s third largest
political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political
parties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting
www.LP.org. The Libertarian Party proudly stands for smaller government,
lower taxes and more freedom.
SAN ANGELO, Texas (AP) - A state appellate court has ruled that child
welfare officials had no right to seize more than 400 children living at a
polygamist sect’s ranch. The Third Court of Appeals in Austin ruled that the
grounds for removing the children were “legally and factually insufficient”
under Texas law.
The appellate court ruled the chaotic hearing held last month did not
demonstrate the children were in any immediate danger, the only measure of
taking children from their homes without court proceedings.
ABC Reset Republican
Debate Tally After Ron Paul Win?
ABC TV apparently reset its tally
of who won the Republican debate it broadcast on August 5, Sunday morning.
At 10 AM EST, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) was winning the debate with over
1,000 votes. Mitt Romney was next with 106. After the debate at
approximately 11:10 AM EST when the tally was rechecked, ABC showed Ron Paul
had just 445 votes. Second was “Nobody Won. I’m Voting Democratic.”
Of course, it could all be an innocent gliche, and perhaps ABC will explain
these tallies or see fit to rectify them. But it has long been FMNN’s
contention, along with others, that Ron Paul, an old fashioned Jeffersonian
conservative, would serve as a metaphor and magnifying glass for America’s
current political difficulties and expanding corruption.
To set the stage for the debate,
ABC moderators began with polling numbers that showed Ron Paul at just two
percent, yet the numbers on the ABC website, at 10 AM EST and again at the
end of the debate (before the tally was reduced), showed him winning the
debate, as he has before, by a wide margin.
Update: DrudgeReport.com put up a
post-debate poll that showed Ron Paul winning the debate by wide margins
(with 45% of the vote) as of 12:30 PM EST. Ron Paul continued to pull away
in the ABC TV poll as well, despite the apparent tampering.
Ron Paul on CNN talking about the 2nd Presidential
debate in South Carolina
Note: It is very rare to find a politician that adheres
to the Constitution and that sticks to his or her convictions with no
retreat, no surrender and no apology.
Virginia Tech Shooting -- Gun Bans Are The Problem, Not
The Solution
“When will we learn that being defenseless is a bad
defense,” asked Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of America?
“All the school shootings that have ended abruptly
in the last ten years were stopped because a law-abiding citizen -- a
potential victim -- had a gun,” Pratt said.
“The latest school shooting demands an immediate end
to the gun-free zone law which leaves the nation’s schools at the mercy of
madmen. It is irresponsibly dangerous to tell citizens that they may not
have guns at schools. The Virginia Tech shooting shows that killers have no
concern about a gun ban when murder is in their hearts.
“Not far from Virginia Tech a killer was stopped at
the Appalachian School of Law when two students were able to go off campus
to their vehicles and get their guns which they used to subdue the killer.
Sadly, not even that awkward defense was available at Virginia Tech.
“Isn’t it interesting that Utah and Oregon are the
only two states that allows faculty to carry guns on campus. And isn’t it
interesting that you haven’t read about any school or university shootings
in Utah or Oregon?. Why not? Because criminals don’t like having their
victims shoot back at them,” Pratt said. “That’s why the American people
want an end to this ineffective gun ban.”
Pollsters have found that 85% of Americans would
find it appropriate for a principal or teacher to use “a gun at school to
defend the lives of students” to stop a school massacre (Research 2000
poll).
The words of Virginia Tech spokesman, Larry Hincker,
should be haunting him in the wake of the massacre at his school. Last year,
a bill was killed in the Virginia legislature to enable those with concealed
weapons permits to carry their guns at schools. Hincker said that “I'm sure
the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly's actions
because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on
our campus.”
“Gun Owners of America has called on Congress to
repeal its deadly law requiring gun free school zones,” said Pratt.
“Likewise, the call has been made to state legislatures to enact legislation
enabling people with concealed carry permits to be able to have their
weapons with them in schools.”
Evangelical Christians are already beginning the
process of selecting the Republican presidential candidate whom they can
anoint as their successor to George W. Bush. Somehow, evangelicals have this
deluded idea that President Bush is one of them. How they came to this
delusion both fascinates and escapes me. Bush is anything but one of them.
However, most evangelicals believe he is, and today it seems that illusion
is greater than reality, anyway. Bush proves that more than anyone I have
ever known. But enough about Bush.
The question burning in the minds of evangelicals
today is: Which Republican candidate for president will we anoint? There are
several possibilities, but apparently Congressman Ron Paul is not one of
them.
Ron Paul received his Bachelor's degree from
Gettysburg College. He received his MD from Duke University. He began his
OB/GYN career in 1968. He was also an Air Force Captain and a member of the
Air National Guard.
Ron Paul has served as a conservative congressman
from Texas for over 16 years. He currently has a 100% rating from The
Conservative Index, which is probably the most relevant and accurate
reflection of a congressman's true conservative record out there.
Furthermore, unlike most Republicans, Paul's
commitment to the life issue is more than rhetoric. For example, during the
2005 congressional session, Rep. Paul introduced H.R. 776, entitled the
"Sanctity of Life Act of 2005."
Had it passed, H.R. 776 would have recognized the
personhood of all unborn babies by declaring, "human life shall be deemed to
exist from conception." The bill also recognized the authority of each State
to protect the lives of unborn children. In addition, H.R. 776 would have
removed abortion from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, thereby
nullifying the Roe v Wade decision, and would have denied funding for
abortion providers. In plain language, H.R. 776 would have ended abortion on
demand. (It is more than interesting to me that none of the evangelicals'
pet politicians, including George W. Bush, even bothered to support Paul's
pro-life bill.)
In addition, Ron Paul has been the most outspoken
defender of constitutional government in the entire congress-bar none. He
has often stood virtually alone against federal abuse of power, corruption,
and big government.
Currently, Ron Paul is one of only a handful of
congressmen that dares speak out against the emerging North American Union,
NAFTA superhighway, and the Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement,
all of which are being promoted by the White House in concert with the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Speaking of the CFR, two of the U.S. senators listed
as presidential candidates in Jerry Falwell's Liberty Journal, Chuck Hagel
and John McCain, are current members of the CFR.
For his entire political career, Ron Paul has served
foursquare upon the principles of constitutional (limited) government, less
taxation, right to life, and personal liberty. Ron Paul is a conservative's
conservative, a principled constitutionalist of the finest order. How is it,
then, that Jerry Falwell and other evangelicals ignore him?
However, the truth is, neither Gingrich, Giuliani,
Romney, nor McCain deserves the support of principled conservatives. Each of
these men has numerous examples of failure and compromise of essential
conservative values.
On Valentine's Day, Chrysler sent a bouquet to its North American
workers. Eleven thousand manufacturing jobs will be eliminated in the next
24 months – 9,000 in the states and 2,000 in Canada – and 2,000 white-collar
workers will be let go, permanently.
The SUV assembly plant in Newark, Del., will be closed. The Warren,
Mich., truck plant and South St. Louis assembly plant will each lose one of
their two shifts. Earlier, Ford posted the largest loss of any company in
history, $12.7 billion, breaking GM's record $10.6 billion loss in 2005.
Toyota, having swept by Chrysler and Ford, is challenging GM for first in
sales in the U.S. market. When we were growing up, U.S. automakers had the
entire U.S. market to themselves and dominated the world market.
How is Japan succeeding?
First, the Japanese make fine cars. Second, Japan manipulates its
currency to keep it cheap against the dollar, to keep the price of Japanese
autos below comparable U.S. models. Third, Tokyo maintains a lock on its
home market by imposing a value added tax on auto imports from America, and
rebating that tax on autos and parts exported to America. This
double-subsidy can give a Japanese car a 15 percent price advantage over a
Ford or GM car in both markets.
Fourth, Japanese auto companies setting up plants here are free of
"legacy costs" of pensions and health insurance for retired U.S. workers,
for Japanese companies have almost no retired American workers. Legacy costs
at GM, Ford and Chrysler must be factored into the price of every car.
Finally, there is the venerable practice of "transfer pricing." Japanese
auto parts manufacturers overcharge U.S subsidiaries for parts. This cuts
the profits of their U.S subsidiaries and thus reduces their U.S. corporate
taxes. Profits are repatriated, virtually untaxed, to Japan.
Thus is Japan capturing America's auto market and bringing down the great
companies that built the machines of war that brought down Japan's empire.
Revenge is a dish best eaten cold.
To stay competitive in their own home market, U.S. manufacturers are
closing down plants, laying off American workers and building their cars
outside the United States.
The day before Chrysler's announcement, the Census Bureau trade figures
were released. Charles MacMillion of MBG Information Services had them
broken down before they hit the wires.
In 2006, the United States ran a deficit in traded goods of $836 billion,
a fifth-straight world record. For manufactured goods, the U.S. trade
deficit reached $536 billion, worsening from the 2005 record of $504
billion. Under President Bush, 3 million U.S. manufacturing jobs have
disappeared – one in every six.
To understand what is happening to Chrysler, Ford and GM, one need only
glance at the trade figures in the auto sector. The United States ran a
trade deficit in trucks, autos and auto parts of $144.7 billion.
If America continues on this course, where we have run up $4 trillion in
trade deficits in manufactured goods since Bill Clinton took office, the end
is predictable.
An eventual collapse of the dollar, making us a poorer nation. The
shuttering of every U.S. factory that makes traded goods. A constant
hemorrhaging of manufacturing jobs, now down to 10 percent of our labor
force. An end of America's pre-eminence as the world's foremost industrial
and technological power. An end to the Second American Century, as the Asian
Century begins.
Everything some have been warning about for decades – huge trade
deficits, a falling dollar, de-industrialization, a rising dependence on
foreigners for the vital necessities of our
national life, diminished freedom of action concomitant with that dependency
– has come to pass.
The world is witnessing the passing of the United States as the greatest
industrial power and the most self-sufficient republic the world had ever
seen. Yet, no one acts. Why?
Ideology is one reason. Free-trade fanatics are like those devout
Christians who will not undergo surgery, even if their malady is killing
them. Second, there are the obtuse who simply cannot see that our "trade
partners" have found a way around the rules and are skinning us alive.
Third, to gain and hold high office, candidates of both parties depend on
the contributions of a monied elite, whose salaries, bonuses, stock options
and golden parachutes depend on a rising share price, which means constantly
cutting costs by moving production out of United States and getting rid of
high-wage American workers.
There are rewards for economic treason.
Look for the Democrats to find a way to give Bush – despite the
astonishing record of trade failures documented above – fast-track authority
to negotiate still more such trade deals. Who takes the king's shilling
becomes the king's man.
Posted February 6, 2007
Traitorous Senatorial Votes
The following Senators voted againstmaking English the
official language of America
:
Now, the
following
are the Senators who voted to giveillegal aliens Social Security benefits.
They are grouped by home state. If a state is
not listed, there was no voting representative.
Alaska
: Stevens (R)
Arizona : McCain (R)
Arkansas : Lincoln (D) Pryor (D)
California : Boxer (D) Feinstein (D)
Colorado : Salazar (D)
Connecticut : Dodd (D) Lieberman (D)
Delaware : Biden (D) Carper (D)
Florida : Martinez (R)
Hawaii : Akaka (D) Inouye (D)
Illinois : Durbin (D) Obama (D)
Indiana : Bayh (D) Lugar (R)
Iowa : Harkin (D)
Kansas : Brownback (R)
Louisiana : Landrieu (D)
Maryland : Mikulski (D) Sarbanes (D)
Massachusetts : Kennedy (D) Kerry (D)
Montana : Baucus (D)
Nebraska : Hagel (R)
Nevada : Reid (D)
New Jersey : Lautenberg (D) Menendez (D)
New Mexico : Bingaman (D)
New York : Clinton (D) Schumer (D)
North Dakota : Dorgan (D)
Ohio : DeWine (R) Voinovich(R)
Oregon : Wyden (D)
Pennsylvania : Specter (R)
Rhode Island : Chafee (R) Reed (D)
South Carolina : Graham (R)
South Dakota : Johnson (D)
Vermont : Jeffords (I) Leahy (D)
Washington : Cantwell (D) Murray (D)
West Virginia
: Rockefeller (D), by Not Voting
Wisconsin : Feingold (D) Kohl (D)
The 200th
anniversary of the birth of Robert E. Lee occurs on January 19th,
and this year the number and variety of Lee celebrations may set a new
record. In Britain, the American Civil War Round Table will hold a series of
lectures honoring General Lee during the month of January. In America,
commemorative events are planned throughout the year.
Lee celebrations have
proliferated in recent years despite demands for the removal of Lee
memorabilia by local chapters of the NAACP and other militant groups. The
self-serving rhetoric of these groups has provoked others to commit acts of
vandalism resulting in the smashing of Lee statuary and the firebombing of
murals containing depictions of the General.
Lee admirers are
sorely disappointed by the capitulations of elected officials to demands by
these belligerent activists. Rather than making an effort to defend Lee
memorabilia or allowing the public to decide its fate, many elected
officials have simply caved in to removal demands, often covertly
eliminating Lee tributes to avoid public recriminations – such was the case
when then Texas Governor, George W. Bush conspired with his crony, Texas
Supreme Court Justice, Albert Gonzales, to have a Robert E. Lee plaque
furtively removed from the Texas Supreme Court building on a weekend when
the Court was not in session.
Regrettably, Bush’s
deceitful act is typical of many of our politicians. They are ruled by
political expediency, and will not do anything that has not been scrutinized
by spin doctors who evaluate how interest groups might react; how media will
respond, or what the potential impact on political careers might be. So what
we get is a committee-sanctioned maneuver designed to conceal the
politician’s true actions or to allow him to give the appearance of having
taken a stand without actually doing so.
Our leaders were not
always so weak-willed in prior generations. And, I maintain, they had a
better grasp of history than today’s crop of obsequious political hacks. As
an illustration, I offer a letter from President Eisenhower written in
response to a critic. The complainant’s letter, dated August 1, 1960, takes
issue with President Eisenhower’s expressed admiration for Robert E. Lee and
reads as follows:
Dear Mr. President:
"At the Republican
Convention I heard you mention that you have the pictures of four (4)
great Americans in your office, and that included in these is a picture of
Robert E. Lee.
I do not understand
how any American can include Robert E. Lee as a person to be emulated, and
why the President of the United States of America should do so is
certainly beyond me.
The most
outstanding thing that Robert E. Lee did was to devote his best efforts to
the destruction of the United States Government, and I am sure that you do
not say that a person who tries to destroy our Government is worthy of
being hailed as one of our heroes.
Will you please
tell me just why you hold him in such high esteem?"
Sincerely yours,
Leon W. Scott, DDS
New Rochelle, NY
To his credit,
President Eisenhower did not embarrass his correspondent by correcting his
extraordinary misreading of American history but simply explained why he
held Robert E. Lee in such high regard.
August 9, 1960
Dear Dr. Scott:
Respecting your
August 1 inquiry calling attention to my often expressed admiration for
General Robert E. Lee, I would say, first, that we need to understand that
at the time of the War Between the States the issue of Secession had
remained unresolved for more than 70 years. Men of probity, character,
public standing and unquestioned loyalty, both North and South, had
disagreed over this issue as a matter of principle from the day our
Constitution was adopted.
General Robert E.
Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our
Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his
cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was
thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured
enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle,
and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many
trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his belief
in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and
unsullied as I read the pages of our history.
From deep
conviction I simply say this: a nation of men of Lee’s caliber would be
unconquerable in spirit and soul. Indeed, to the degree that present-day
American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his
devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal
the nation’s wounds once the bitter struggle was over, we, in our own time
of danger in a divided world, will be strengthened and our love of freedom
sustained.
Such are the
reasons that I proudly display the picture of this great American on my
office wall.
Sincerely,
Dwight D. Eisenhower
When we compare
Eisenhower’s actions with the behavior of our current politicians, we can
only feel a sense of loss. Today’s elected officials have been so
intimidated by the politically correct pestilence that has infected our
nation that they would never casually express an opinion on any subject for
fear that it might offend someone, somewhere. But President Eisenhower
belonged to another generation, and his respectful response to his obtuse
critic is what we would have expected from a man who had Robert E. Lee as a
role-model. Certainly, it would be hard to find a better role-model than
Robert E. Lee, a noble Christian gentleman who continues to inspire
Americans almost 140 years after his death.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/jarvis/jarvis105.html
Posted January 11, 2007
Racist Ingrates
J. B. Cash's Column
Pictured: Penn State head coach Joe Paterno covered for
Larry Johnson's antics in college, but Johnson and other black players
prefer to play for black coaches
(1/6/07) On a recent airing of HBO's “Inside the NFL," one of the show's
hosts, Cris Carter, asked star running back Larry Johnson of the Kansas City
Chiefs if he felt that he and other black players play harder for black
coaches. His answer was "yes." Johnson went on to say that only a black
coach could understand the "struggles" a black athlete has to endure.
This surprising revelation should serve as an important point of information
to all of the white coaches in the NFL and elsewhere. They should not
recruit, draft, or hire black players and select white players instead. Why?
They will be assured of getting players that will play hard for them and not
worry that they don’t understand their “struggles” — which include million
dollar contracts, media worship, fan adoration, and near unrestricted
protection from criminal prosecution.
Really, if what Larry Johnson says is true, and it probably is (although
that makes the coaching career of Denny Green a mystery), then white coaches
best beware and start filling the roster with people who are not such thinly
veiled racists that they would allow the skin color of their coach to affect
how they play.
Once again a black man says something that, were a white player to say it,
would be front page news and the sports establishment would be “up in arms”
over the comment and the racism it explicitly advocates. But we live in
“DOUBLE-STANDARD WORLD” where blacks are free to express any anti-white
sentiment they wish with no repercussions, while even the most innocuous
remarks about race are professional suicide for whites.
Imagine if a white player were to say: “I think white players play harder
for white coaches”. WOW! Now that would get some attention. Any white player
saying such a thing would of course be absolutely pilloried. His remarks
would be universally denied, even if they were true. He would face
unrelenting criticism until he recanted his comments and paid some
humiliating price in groveling apologies to be allowed back into polite
society. More likely, his professional football career would be over.
How important is it for a coach to have players that play hard for him? It
probably is the most important thing in the game. Talent is usually pretty
equal, especially in the pro game, and since football is the ultimate
copycat sport there is usually little difference in basic coaching
strategies. Thus it comes down to motivating a large group of primarily
ghetto blacks with bad attitudes that have been spoiled and pampered all of
their sporting lives, to give a few minutes of their time to actually catch,
block, and tackle, so as to win a football game.
If I were an owner of a football team I would immediately fire all my white
coaches and hire black ones in their places. The reason? I would want every
edge I could get to win games and Larry Johnson has just let everyone in on
a little secret that could make the difference between winning and losing.
The other strategy, that of dumping black players in place of white ones, is
a better way to go, in that you would be surrounding yourself with better
people. Unfortunately that solution is impractical, as there are so few
white players to choose from due to anti-white recruiting practices by
college coaches. Also, any attempt to hire white football players at the
expense of black players is considered racist while firing white coaches and
hiring black ones would be considered ‘enlightened.’
White coaches should get “enlightened” and realize that the
clock is ticking for them. Blacks will lobby for their own tirelessly and
with no criticism from the media. That is going to ratchet up the pressure
to hire black coaches even higher. Unless the white coach wants to go the
way of the white running back they better wake up and hear what is being
said. Their only option is to pick the people who WILL play hard for them.
They know who that is.
White coaches, however, are beset with the plantation mindset. They think
that since they oversee the plantation the workers will “like” them and
respect them. What the workers (and “worker” is used here merely as a
euphemism, very little actual “work” is being done) like and respect is the
position the coach has over them. Don’t think for a minute that they
wouldn’t revolt and replace the white overlord with one of their own.
White people think, mistakenly, that because black people need them to
handle those tasks that white people are so good at, that black people WANT
them to be there to help. Nope!
As Larry Johnson admits, without actually elaborating on the point, is that
no matter how much white coaches have helped black kids throughout the
football maturation process from pee-wee to the pros...no matter how many
times white coaches have junked the careers of white players in favor of
lesser black players...no matter how much help they have received from white
support staff throughout their phony “student-athlete” college
careers...they have absolutely not one whit of thanks or gratitude. It’s
just: “Thanks for the help sucker! Now stand aside while we get one of our
own in here and you white dudes can go to hell.”
Thanks, Larry, for the heads up. White people need to know that their help
and assistance will get them nothing but disrespect and ingratitude. It’s a
message that more white people are starting to hear loud and clear. It’s
about time.
Posted January 1, 2007
FEDERAL HATE BILL COULD BE INTRODUCED THIS WEEK
By Rev. Ted Pike
With Congress back in session on January 3, the federal
"hate crimes" bill could be reintroduced any time. The Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith introduced the same legislation last January 6, three
days after Congress convened.
This is the most dangerous legislation ever to come before
Congress. It leads directly to an end of free speech. Once free speech is
gone, there is little to prevent the loss of all our other freedoms. The new
Democrat-controlled Congress has all the votes it needs to quickly run this
Orwellian bill through committee in the House and Senate and pass it. Unless
they lose their nerve, thrown back by massive protest from the American
people.
Extraordinary action must be taken NOW to back down ADL
and intimidate them from even introducing the hate bill in this session.
Your Voice Will Make the Difference
Protest from the American people has defeated the hate
bill three times in the last two years. Here's how, with God’s help, we can
do it again:
1) Powerfully impact members of Congress from your
district:
At www.truthtellers.org are listed the names of the top
legislative aides for every member of Congress (except the newly elected
members). These legal experts and researchers exert tremendous influence
on how busy senators and representatives think and vote. Now you can just
as powerfully influence them!
At www.truthtellers.org your two Senators and their
aides are listed alphabetically according to state. House members and
their aides are separately listed the same way.
On the list, locate the House member for your district.
(If you don't know your district, call the capitol hotline tollfree at
1-877-851-6437 or toll at 1-202-225-3121. This information is also
available by calling your local library or at
www.house.gov/writerep.)
Make about 30 copies, enough to send to each member of
the Senate and House from your district plus their aides. Fold into
thirds.
Address each name and tape (do not staple) the
flyer closed, add postage and mail.
Because you are a constituent of these members of
Congress and their aides, you have considerable influence. You have power
to vote them out next term and power to end the aides' employment. When
they see your zip code, they will read the flyer. It will deeply
impact them because all they have heard so far is ADL propaganda. These
brochures will burrow deep into every legislative office, raising
questions, doubts, fears and curiosity about ADL's hate crimes agenda.
Don't hesitate to send this brochure to liberal members
of Congress or their aides. Hate laws can turn on them also. Already in
many western nations liberals who publicly criticize Islam can be indicted
as hate criminals. If enough of these brochures penetrate Congress, the
effect will be to prejudice even liberal members of Congress and their
staffs against the ADL hate crimes agenda. (Note: Do not send this
brochure to members of Congress or their aides outside your district.
Nonconstituent mail is discarded.)
2) Influence all members of
Congress:
Begin toll-free phone calls to Congress on January 3.
Visit www.truthtellers.org for the complete list of members of the new
Congress. Set aside 15 minutes a day (before work or during lunch) to call
toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or 1-866-340-9281 (toll is 1-202-225-3121).
Leave this message: "Please don’t vote for 'anti-hate'
legislation. Hate laws have taken away free speech in Canada and most
European countries." Ask to be transferred to the next member of Congress
on the list or use the redial feature on your phone. In only 15 minutes a
day for 7 weeks, you can voice a powerful protest to every member of
Congress against establishment of a "big
brother" federal hate crimes bureaucracy like Canada's.
