THE GREAT PYRAMID

Part One: The Ancient Mystery Unraveled

 

   
Will someone please explain to me how Egyptologists and evolutionists explain the fact that the building expertise and high technology that Egypt had to build the Great Pyramid was lost within just a few generations?  Nothing was built after it which comes anywhere close to rivaling its technical prowess; many engineers agree that we could not even build it today, in the 21st Century!

So, again, what theory or explanation do evolutionary-based Egyptologists give for this mystery?  In other words, how do you explain the fact that ancient man was more sophisticated and intelligent than modern man?

I think one way that "experts" get around this is by not looking soberly enough at exactly how amazing the Great Pyramid is.  If we are purposely blinded to its technical brilliance then what's to explain? We say that ancient man lived in caves, farmed, and occasionally built large pyramids, shrug our shoulders and then talk, as if on automatic pilot, about the onward development of the human race.  All the while neglecting all the evidence of the supreme intelligence and engineering achievements of the ancients.  How convenient!

If one carries a biblical view of man, explaining the great technological drop off after the time of the Great Pyramid, explanations are easy.  Men were created intelligent.  They have always been intelligent.   They have, since the first few generations of human development, exhibited tremendous engineering prowess.  But several major disasters have devastated the planet in historic times, including the Flood, continental drift at the time of the Tower of Babel,  and the planetary fly-bys in the days of the Exodus and the days of Isaiah as explained by Immanuel Velikovsky and others.  These disasters destroyed the high technologies of their day, and it was only in the 18th and 19th centuries with the advent of the modern industrial revolution, that we have regained the use and mastery of many ancient technologies.

This explanation is logical, plausible, and fully supported by an honest look at the available evidence.  Thus the Great Pyramid, besides being an evidence of the early intelligence of ancient man, and an evidence of the advanced technological skills of ancient man, is also a testament to the natural disasters which, during historic times,  humbled man's technical progress to a "Stone Age" level, requiring a redevelopment in later eras.

The only real question posed by this way of looking at the evidence, is how to explain the fact that the Great Pyramid avoided the devastation of the planetary fly-bys, the earthquakes and tsunamis that destroyed so much else in the ancient world.  But then, here again, the best explanation is the brilliance of ancient man.  Flying jet aircraft into modern skyscrapers may bring them to the ground, but not so with the Pyramid.  It would lick up the jet fuel and spit out the metallic debris, and live on to tell the story!

Which is what it continues to do! 

Let its story continue coming your way...

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

.July2006