| A question often posed to me when people learn I have written about film is, "Which film is your favorite?" This is an understandable query, but I feel uncomfortable boiling down decades of art and entertainment into a knee-jerk response that must somehow represent the zenith of cinematic expression, at least for me.
My knee-jerk response has usually been Stanley Kubrick's 2001:
A SPACE ODYSSEY, for its beauty and technical wonder, its anthropological
cunning and, most of all, its uncompromising narrative which demands attention
and reflection. All of these elements pointed me in the direction of
film studies when I first saw the movie decades ago and
I am still in awe of it today.
But lots of people feel that way about 2001, and so as I've gotten
older and seen many, many more films, I am tempted to replace my knee-jerk
response from time to time, if only to make these film musings less
Kubrick-centric.
Besides, human beings are notoriously, jealously selfish about their obsessions. What fun is bestowing one's designation of the greatest film (or the worst film) onto a particular motion picture along with millions of other like-minded film fans?
Some time ago I came up with an esoteric way to help justify a
year's "best films" list I was putting together, and so I
wish to invite visitors to WIDE ANGLE / CLOSEUP to select their favorite film
by applying the following test:
There is a FIRE raging in a warehouse containing the original negatives
and all existing interpositives, prints and video masters of
every film ever
made!!! Critics, film students
and movie buffs are racing in and out trying to rescue certain articles before they go up in flames
and disappear forever. (Recall the rush to pull
out Queen Elizabeth's art treasures when Windsor Castle burned?) YOU are among
the throng with an opportunity to save a film, but you only have time to go in once; the
smoke and flames are lapping at your heels this very instant. And for the sake of argument, all of
the precious materials on each film weigh the same and take up the same amount of space. (In
other words, it wouldn't be any easier or harder to save either the complete
13 1/2 hour BERLIN ALEXANDERPLATZ or the 7-minute WHAT'S OPERA, DOC.)
Now the question: which film would you
risk your life to save so that you, your children, your great-grandchildren,
etc., will be able to see it as well? Or (and you needn't feel ashamed
about it) would you just stand back and watch the flames lick higher
into the sky while Roger Ebert dukes it out with Pauline Kael to see who
gets to rescue CITIZEN KANE?
Send your responses in, and I will post a list of the motion pictures
that are assured at least somebody cares enough to risk the Ultimate
Sacrifice.
The prize? Like, you really expect one? Well, let's
just say you will feel the satisfaction of making public your own cinematic
obsessions. And isn't that what the Internet is all about?
Kindly e-mail the
following
information:
- Name:
- e-mail address:
- The motion picture I would choose to risk my mortal being to preserve and protect is
____:
- For what reason(s)?
For the earliest survey results, click
here.
|