A TWA 800 CRASH COVER-UP?
I will mention the hard facts that are known and were reported in many articles written about the crash of TWA 800. Just facts. You will have to put on your jury hat and weigh the evidence. These are true facts and when you put on your jury hat for evaluation, you will make up your own mind if it was an electrical wire arcing or something more sinister, that needed a cover-up, to protect our government from an embarrassing situation.
Before describing the evidence, you must go back to Manila, May 1990. A 737-300 CWT exploded on the Tarmac. 8 people were killed and 30 more passengers were badly burned and injured. The CWT explosion was caused by BMS 13-51 (Kapton wire) electrical arcing that caused a spark and ignited fuel fumes. I got a chance to see part of a Kapton wire bundle and it showed evidence of an electrical arc tracking FLASHOVER (short circuit). The passengers badly burned and injured, were in the vicinity of the CWT explosion. The NOSE did NOT separate from the body. With this in mind, let's look at TWA 800. Boeing engineering said that the nose would NOT separate from the body with a CWT explosion and it didn't.
1. Boeing engineering stated that the maximum pressure generated by a CWT explosion would be 15 ppsi. To separate the nose from the body of an aircraft, it would take, at least 35 to 40 ppsi to tear skin and fracture the structure. The nose did not separate from the 737-300 over in Manila.
2. A Mr. Rodgers lost his daughter in the TWA crash. When he got to view his daughter's body he said, "her pretty red hair did NOT show any evidence of being subjected to being hit with fire. Her seat was right over the CWT. If it would have exploded, her hair and body would have been badly burned. The coroner that was processing the bodies made a statement that, "the only bodies showing any evidence of being burned, were the bodies that hit burning fuel in the WATER."
3. President Clinton signed an Executive Order on the date that the FBI confiscated the radar tape from Sanders. E.O. 13039 removed legal protection from the Navy missile battery, that was in the vicinity of the explosion, from any Naval personnel wanting to be a WHISTLEBLOWER. WHY? The E.O. was published on the internet at the White House web site for a few days and then it suddenly disappeared. WHY?
4. A major Harris was flying a helicopter in the immediate vicinity of the explosion stated, "that he witnessed two ordnance fire trails that went to the target." He was a veteran of the Viet Nam war and had seen many missile fire trails fired while he was in combat.
5. Not one, but hundreds of eye witnesses from the shore, said the same thing.
6. All the recovered plane debris was PRESSURED WASHED before it was trucked to the hanger for re-assembly. WHY? If they suspected a bomb or missile, it makes NO sense to pressure wash all the debris, before it was even examined. The FBI was calling the shots!! Maybe they knew something and wanted to be sure, that all evidence of missiles or a bomb, were removed before allowing the debris to be re-assembled. Something similar to the way they handled some criminal cases in their Lab?
7. Every time Boeing loses an airplane, the company fights like a wounded tiger to say that it was NOT the company's fault that the airplane crashed. Do you see any startling news reports that Boeing is fighting like a wounded tiger over wiring being the igniter source for the crash of TWA 800? The answer is NO and there are three probable reasons:
- Boeing needed the FTC to bless the merger with McDonnell Douglas. They got it.
- Boeing needed the government to pressure the EU community to accept the merger. They got it.
- Boeing wanted the government to pressure the Chinese government to buy $6 billion dollars of new Boeing airplanes. They got it.
So ask yourself, what must Boeing have to pay for this government support? If the government told Boeing to BACK OFF on pursuing the cause of TWA 800 being something other than wiring, I guess that would be a logical answer, wouldn't it? It's time for Boeing's payback to the government for all the support Boeing received. I believe that would make sense.
So if you look at the points I brought out. One would have to assume that it was a missile or two that was responsible for bringing down TWA 800. If you are interested in reading additional facts about the possible cover-up, I am enclosing an e-mail on how to obtain Sanders book. I haven't gotten one yet or read the book but it must be full of interesting facts. << I received a letter from James Sanders announcing his new book " ALTERED EVIDENCE " It's $25 including shipping and handling and he'll autograph it if desired. Additional books are $10. His address if you need it is: P.O. Box 336, Charles City, VA 23030-0336 >>
If you do NOT believe the government alters evidence, then read my posts on how the NTSB has altered evidence of what caused VALUJET 592 to crash. It was NOT 02 canisters that started the A/C fire, it was electrical arcing that ignited the fire. The government today has to use mass cover-ups, as a daily way of life, to prevent its citizens from knowing the truth about major issues. To name a few, Desert Storm mysterious military sickness, FBI criminal lab, use of Agent Orange military sickness etc.
Patrick A. Price