|
|||||||||||
http://members.aol.com/porchnus/memorial/voucher1.htm PORCH NUS-- The E-Zine of The Front Porch The Aaron Hiller Memorial Library ![]() by Aaron Hiller Nashville Banner - Community Voices - September 11, 1996
An intriguing modern example of this technique concerns the inventive usage of two simple, seemingly innocuous words -- "private schools." Between now and Election Day in November, we can expect to hear this slick euphemism repeatedly. In response to court-ordered desegregation of public schools in the 1950s, some Southern states, like Alabama, reacted with schemes to legally abolish public education. When this proved too difficult to accomplish, local churches were prevailed upon to set up their own schools. These schools would be outside the public school system and the new desegregation laws. They could select their students by any criteria they chose, and parents could be assured that children would not have to mingle with non-whites or, hopefully, non-Christians. And, as an additional incentive, their children would receive a religious education tantamount to Sunday school five days a week. Textbooks that mentioned Darwinian evolution would be eliminated from class discussion and there would be no nonsense about restricting school prayer.
Then, some brilliant religious schemers came up with the school voucher plan. It would simultaneously accomplish two important goals. First, the church schools would be funded by public tax money, and at the same time the public schools would be deprived of same and be put on the road to oblivion. In their writings, the Revs. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson freely admit that they perceive public schools as enemy No. 1 of their brand of Christianity. Think of the blessings that would accrue by pre-empting public school tax dollars and using them to bail out the financially-ailing church schools. Furthermore, think of the blessings that would accrue from proselytizing among captive new pupils. It was a "win-win" scheme. There was only one problem. It was recognized that there would be much difficulty in selling a church school subsidizing plan to the general public and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court. With another stroke of genius, the proponents came up with a marvelous double-speak euphemism for church schools. Henceforth, the phrase "private schools" would be used to describe the voucher plan beneficiaries. There was no blatant lying involved. After all, they were not public schools, and that ipso facto made them private schools.
None of the voucher enthusiasts took the time to explain that the best private schools pick their students carefully, not the other way around. Nor do they mention that for every non-sectarian private school available in this area, there are something like 60 sectarian schools. Most of the latter, however, would be delighted to accept any prospective believer bearing a cashable voucher. One merely hopes that the vast majority of us, who are products of the public schools, learned enough to recognize a super scam double-speak euphemism when confronted with one of such enormous audacity. Aaron Hiller is a retired corporate sales manager. Use "Back" to return to Memorial Library menu. |
|||||||||||