|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four-Vectors (4-Vectors) of Special Relativity: A Study of Elegant PhysicsThe 4-vectors (four-vectors) of Special Relativistic (SR) theory are fundamental entities that accurately, precisely, and beautifully describe the physical properties of the world around us. While it is known that SR is not the deepest theory, it is valid for the majority of the universe. It is believed to apply to all forms of interaction, including that of fundamental particles, and with only the exception being that of large-scale gravitational phenomena, where spacetime itself is significantly curved, for which General Relativity (GR) is required. The SR 4-vector notation is one of the most powerful tools in understanding the physics of the universe, as it simplifies a great many of the physical relations.
Introduction4-vectors are tensorial entities which display Poincare' Invariance, meaning they leave invariant the differential squared interval (ds)2=(cdt)2-dx2-dy2-dz2. A consequence of this invariant measurement is that any physical equation which is written in Poincare' Invariant form is automatically valid for any inertial reference frame, regardless of how coordinate systems are arranged. Transformations which leave these vectors unchanged include fixed translations through space and/or time, rotations through space, and boosts (coordinate systems moving with constant velocity) through spacetime. Since 4-vectors are tensors, and Poincare' Invariant, they can be used to describe and explain the physical properties that are observed in nature. Although the vector components may change from one reference frame to another, the 4-vector itself is an invariant, meaning that it gives valid physical information for all inertial observers. Likewise, the scalar products of Lorentz Invariant 4-vectors are themselves invariant quantities, known as Lorentz Scalars. Lorentz Invariance is a special subset of Poincare' Invariance.The reason that I really like this notation is that it beautifully and elegantly displays the relations between lots of different physical properties. It also devolves very nicely into the limiting/approximate Newtonian cases of v<<c by letting γ =>1 and dγ/dt =>0. SR tells us that several different physical properties are actually dual aspects of the same thing, with the only real difference being one's point of view, or reference frame. Examples include: (Time , Space), (Energy , Momentum), (Power , Force), (Frequency , WaveNumber), (ChargeDensity , CurrentDensity), (EM-Potential , EM-VectorPotential), (Time Differential, Gradient), etc. Also, things are even more related than that. The 4-Momentum is just a constant times 4-Velocity. The 4-WaveVector is just a constant times 4-Momentum. In addition, the very important conservation/continuity equations seem to just fall out of the notation. The universe apparently has some simple laws which can be easy to write down by using a little math and a super notation. AbbreviationsQM=Quantum Mechanics SR=Special RelativitySM=Statistical Mechanics GR=General Relativity Units of Measure - (SI variant, mksC)
Useful SR Quantitiesημν=gμν=gμν=Diag[+1,-1,-1,-1]: Minkowski Flat Spacetime Metricβ = (v/c): Beta factor, the fraction of the speed of light c [dimensionless] γ = (1 / √[1-β2] )=(1 / √[1-(v/c)2] ): Lorentz Gamma Scaling Factor [dimensionless] (~1 for v<<c, +big for v~c) φ = ln[γ(1+ β)] = BoostParameter/Rapidity (which remains additive in SR, unlike v) τ = t / γ : Proper Time = Rest Time (time as measured in a frame at rest) dτ = dt / γ : Differential of Proper Time d/dτ = γ d/dt = U·∂ : Differential wrt Proper Time V·V=Vo·Vo : Invariant interval is often easier to calculate in rest frame coordinates √[1+x] ~ (1+x/2) for x<<1 : Math relation often used to simplify Relativistic eqns. to Newtonian eqns. δuv = Delta function = (1 if u=v, 0 if u≠v) γ v = c √[γ2-1] , βγ = √[γ2-1] , c2 dγ = γ3 v dv , d(γ v) = γ3 dv c=1/√[εoµo] SR Notation UsedThere are several different SR notations available that are, mathematically speaking, equivalent.However, some are easier to employ than others; I have used that one which seems the most practical and least error-prone. Always check notation conventions in SR & 4-Vector references, they are all relative ;-) V=(c vt,vx,vy,vz)=(v0,v1,v2,v3) Intervals: Time/Temporal (+interval)=0 coordinate Light/Null (0 interval) Space/Spatial (-interval)=1,2,3 coordinates Temporal Components: Future(+), Now(0), Past(-) 4-Vector Name: always references the "Spatial" 3-vector component, c-factor always applied to "Temporal" scalar component, as necessary to give consistent units for all vector components 4-Vector Magnitude: usually references the "Temporal" scalar component 4-Vector Symbols: V=(cv0,v)=(cv0,v1+v2+v3): 4-vector={BOLD UPPERCASE}, time component={regular lowercase}, space 3-vector component={bold lowercase} Relativistic Component: v --> vo in a rest-frame, typically v = γ vo (dilation) or v = (1/γ) vo (contraction) eg. t = γ to (time dilation), L = (1/γ) Lo (length contraction) Minkowski SR Metric: ημν=gμν=gμν=Diag[+1,-1,-1,-1]=Diag[+1,-1] Imaginary unit: i used only for QM, not for SR frame transformations or metric Minkowski SR Spacetime MetricThe main assumption of SR, or GR for that matter, is that the structure of spacetime is described by a metric gμν. A metric tells how the spacetime is put together, or how distances are measured within the spacetime. These distances are known as intervals. In GR, the metric may take a number of different values, depending on various circumstances which determine its curvature. We are interested in the flat/pseudo-Euclidean spacetime of SR, also known as the Minkowski Metric, for which ημν=gμν=gμν=Diag[+1,-1,-1,-1].
There are other ways of defining the metrics and 4-vectors available in SR which lead to the same results, but this particular notation has some nice qualities which place it above the others. First, it shows the difference between time and space in the metric. We perceive time differently than space, despite there being only spacetime. Also, this metric gives all of the SR relations (frame transformations) without using the imaginary unit "i" in the transforms. This is important, as "i" is absolutely essential for the complex wave functions once we get to QM. It is not needed, and would only complicate and confuse matters in SR. This metric will allow us to separate the "real" SR stuff from the "complex/imaginary" QM stuff easily. It also allows for the possibility of complex components in SR 4-vectors. The choice of +1 for the time component simplifies the derived equations later on. SR 4-Vector Basicsημν=gμν=gμν=DiagnolMatrix(1,-1,-1,-1): Minkowski Spacetime Metric-the "flat" spacetime of SRA=Au=(at,ax,ay,az)=(a0,a1,a2,a3)=(a0,a): Typical SR 4-vector Au=(at,-ax,-ay,-az)=(a0,-a1,-a2,-a3)=(a0,-a): Typical SR 4-covector, we can always get the 4-vector form with Au=gμνAu Basically, this has the effect of putting a minus sign on the space component B=Bu=(bt,bx,by,bz)=(b0,b1,b2,b3)=(b0,b): Another typical SR 4-vector A·B=guv Au Bv=Av Bv=Au Bu =+a0b0-a1b1-a2b2-a3b3=(+a0b0-a·b): The Scalar Product relation, used to make SR invariants A'u=Luv Av: Lorentz Transform (Transformation tensor which gives relations between alternate boosted inertial reference frames)
Formally, this is like a rotation in 3-space, but becomes a hyperbolic rotation through spacetime
for a Lorentz boost Complex SR 4-VectorsA few 4-vectors are known to have complex components. The Polarization 4-vector is one of these. It will be assumed that all physical 4-vectors may potentially be complex.i = √[-1] :Imaginary Unit e0: Unit vector in the temporal direction (typically not used since the temporal unit is always considered a scalar) e1, e2, e3 :Unit Vectors in the spatial x, y, z directions (used instead of i, j, k so that there is no confusion with the imaginary unit i) Note that for the following 4-vectors, the superscript is the tensor index, not exponentiation. A=(a0c + a1c e1+ a2c e2+ a3c e3): Complex 4-vector has complex components, 1 along time and 3 along space Scalar[A] = a0c: Just the time component Vector[A] = a1c e1 + a2c e2 + a3c e3: Just the spatial components A = Scalar[A] + Vector[A] A=( (a0r + a0i ) + (a1r + a1i ) e1 + (a2r + a2i ) e2 + (a3r + a3i ) e3 ): Complex 4-vector has real + imaginary components, 1 each along time and 3 each along space Re[A] = ( (a0r ) + (a1r ) e1 + (a2r ) e2 + (a3r ) e3 ): Only the real components Im[A] = ( (a0i ) + (a1i ) e1 + (a2i ) e2 + (a3i ) e3 ): Only the imaginary components A = Re[A] + i Im[A] A=(a0r + i a0i,ar + i ai) : Standard 4-vector A*=(a0r - i a0i,ar - i ai): Complex conjugate 4-vector, just changes the sign of the imaginary component A=(a0r + i a0i,ar + i ai) : A*=(a0r - i a0i,ar - i ai) B=(b0r + i b0i,br + i bi) : B*=(b0r - i b0i,br - i bi) A·B=[( a0r b0r - ar·br ) - ( a0i b0i - ai·bi )] + i [( a0r b0i - ar·bi ) + ( a0i b0r - ai·br )] : General scalar product A·A=[( a0r2 - ar·ar ) - ( a0i2 - ai·ai )] + 2i [( a0r a0i - ar·ai )] = |A|2 : Scalar product of 4-vector with itself gives the magnitude squared A·A*=[( a0r2 + a0i2 ) - ( ar·ar + ai·ai )] = Re[A·A*]: Scalar product of 4-vector with its complex conjugate is Real, thus Im[A·A*]=0 ∂·B=[( ∂/c∂tr b0r + delr·br ) - ( ∂/c∂ti b0i + deli·bi )] + i [( ∂/c∂tr b0i + delr·bi ) + ( ∂/c∂ti b0r + deli·br )] =[( ∂/c∂tr b0r + delr·br ) - ( ∂/c∂ti b0i + deli·bi )] =Re[∂·B] The 4-Divergence of a Complex 4-Vector is Real, assuming that: The real gradient acts only on real spaces & the imaginary gradient acts only on imaginary spaces, thus Im[∂·B]=0 I believe this is due to the physical functions being complex analytic functions. Fundamental/Universal Mathematical Constantsi = √[-1] :Imaginary UnitPi = 3.14159265358979... :Circular Const Fundamental/Universal Physical Constants (Lorentz Scalars)c = Speed of Light Consthbar = Planck's Reduced Const (h / 2Pi) - relates particle to wave - Action kB = Boltzmann's Const - relates temperature to energy mo = Rest Mass Const (varies with particle type) qo = Electric Charge Const (varies with particle type) Note: I do not set various fundamental physical constants to dimensionless unity, (i.e. c=h=G=kB=1). While doing so may make the mathematics a bit easier, it ultimately obscures the physics. While 4-Vectors may be math, SR 4-Vectors is physics. I keep the dimensions and units. Fundamental/Universal Physical SR 4-Vectors (Lorentz Vectors)
Fundamental/Universal Relations
Flux 4-Vectors, 4-Vector "Charges", and the Continuity/Conservation Equation∂·R=(∂/c∂t,-del)·(ct,r)=(∂/c∂t[ct]+del·r)=(∂/∂t[t]+del·r)=(1+3)=4 ∂·R=4 The divergence of open spacetime is equal to the number of independent dimensions (1 time + 3 space) d/dτ (∂·R) = d/dτ (4) = 0 d/dτ (∂·R) = d/dτ (∂) · R + ∂·d/dτ (R) = d/dτ (∂) · R + ∂·U = γ d/dt (∂) · R + ∂·U = γ d/dt (∂)·R + ∂·U = γ (d/dt(∂/c∂t), -d/dt(del))·(ct,r) + ∂·U = γ (d/dt(∂/c∂t)(ct)+d/dt(del))·r + ∂·U = γ (d/dt(∂/∂t)(t)+d/dt(del))·r + ∂·U = γ (d/dt(1)+d/dt(3))+ ∂·U = ∂·U thus, ∂·U = 0, which is the general continuity equation, one might say the conservation of event flux. Due to this property, any Lorentz scalar constant times 4-Velocity U is a conserved quantity. For example, let N=noU, so ∂·N = ∂·noU = no∂·U = no(0) = 0. The quantity no is conserved. Any "charge" constant becomes a 4-vector when multiplied by the 4-Velocity, and obeys the Conservation of Charge/Continuity equation ∂·J=dp/∂t +del·j=0 where J=ρoU let Charge Qo=ρoVo, where ρo is the "rest charge density", ρ = γρo is the relativistic "charge density", Vo is the rest volume, and j=γρou=ρu is the "ChargeDensity-Flux or Current Density" then ChargeFlux 4-Vector=CurentDensity 4-Vector J=ρoU=ρo γ(c, u)=ρ(c, u)=(cρ, j) In the case of "electric" charge, ρo is the "rest electric-charge density", and j is the ElectricChargedensity-flux=electric current density In the case of "number" charge, ρo is the "rest number-charge density" In the case of "mass" charge, ρo is the "rest mass density", and j is the mass-flux=mass current density=momentum density
d/dτ[R] = (i hbar / mo) ∂
Event motion ~ spacetime structure - depends on i hbar / mo
R·R=(Δ s)2=(ct)2-r·r = (ct)2-|r|2
: dR·dR=(ds)2=(c dt)2-dr·dr = (c dt)2-|dr|2 :
Invariant Interval
Derived Physical Constants (Scalar Products of Lorentz Vectors = Lorentz Scalars)R·R=(Δs)2=(ct)2-r·r = (ct)2-|r|2 : dR·dR=(ds)2=(c dt)2-dr·dr = (c dt)2-|dr|2U·U=c2 : A·A=-a2 P·P=(moc)2 : N·N=(noc)2: J·J=(poc)2=(qonoc)2 K·K=(moc / hbar)2=(wo/c)2 ∂·∂=(∂/c∂t,-del)·(∂/c∂t,-del)=∂2/c2∂t2-del·del=-(moc / hbar)2 : ** ∂·∂ is also known as the D'alembertian (Wave Operator) ** AEM·AEM=(VEM/c,aEM)·(VEM/c,aEM)=(VEM/c)2-aEM·aEM=???? P·U=moc2=Eo Rest Energy K·U=moc2/hbar=Eo/hbar=wo Rest Ang. Frequency U·F=γ2(dE/dt-u·f)=γ dmo/dt c2 (pure force if dmo/dt=0) ??? Power Law U1·U2=γ[u1]γ[u2](c2-u1·u2)=γ[ur]c2 (The scalar product of two uniformly moving particles is proportional to the γ factor of their relative velocities) U·∂=d/dτ=γ(∂/∂t + u·del)=γ d/dt ∂·R=4 The divergence of open spacetime is equal to the number of independent dimensions ∂·U=0, which is the general continuity equation, one might say the conservation of event flux. Invariants & Conservation LawsThere is an important distinction between an invariant quantity and a conserved quantity.An invariant quantity has the same value wrt. all inertial systems, but may change upon physical interaction (e.x a fusion reaction "redistributes" the rest masses). A conserved quantity maintains the same value both before and after an interaction, although the component values may appear different in different frames. In 4-vector notation: An invariant quantity is a Lorentz Scalar, the dot product of two 4-Vectors, A·B=invariant. A conserved quantity is a component of a 4-Vector that has 4-Divergence=0, d·V=0.
Derived EquationsE2 = p·p c2 + mo2c4: Energy of a particle has a Momentum component and a RestMass componentTotal Energy: E = mc2 = γ[u] moc2 = hbar w Kinetic Energy: T = mc2-moc2 = (γ[u]-1) moc2 Rest Energy: Eo = moc2
Relativistic Stat-Mech (SM)/Thermodynamic stuffU=γ(c, u), P = (E/c,p), d(P)=(dE/c,dp)U·d(P)=γ(c dE/c-u·dp)=γ(dE-u·dp)=γ(T dS - P dV + µ dN)=(To dSo - Po dVo + µo dNo) = 0 ??
U·d(P)=γ(dE-u·dp)=γ(T dS - P dV + Sum[µi dNi] + w·dL + E·dP + B·dM) ??? E=Energy, [Total energy of system] u=Velocity, p=Momentum, [Translational/Kinetic energy] T=Temperature, S=Entropy [Heat energy] P=Pressure, V=Volume [Mechanical compression energy?] µ=ChemicalPotenital, N=ParticleNumber, ["Chemical" energy=energy per particle] (Sum over different particle types) w=Angular Velocity, L=Angular Momentum, [Rotational energy] E=Electric Field, P=Polarization, [Electrical energy] B=Magnetic Field, M=Magnetisation, [Magnetic energy] Always have (intensive var * differential extensive var), intensive=sys size independent, extensive=sys size proportional U=γ(c, u), P = (E/c,p), U·U=c2 , P·P=(moc)2 U·P=γ(c E/c-u·p)=γ(E-u·p)=γ(T S - P V + µ N)=(To So - Po Vo + µo No) ?
V*P (particle superstructure = Vol*Press) Relativistic Analytical-MechAction S=S(ct,x,y,z)dS/dτ=0 dS/dτ =U·d(S)=γ(∂S/∂t + u·del(S))=0 see Menzel pg.172 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics∂·∂=(∂/c∂t,-del)·(∂/c∂t,-del)=∂2/c2∂t2-del·del=-(moc / hbar)2: Klein-Gordon Relativistic Wave eqn.DEM=(∂/c∂t+iq/hbar VEM/c, -del+iq/hbar aEM) =d+(iq/hbar)AEM DEM·DEM=-(moc / hbar)2: Klein-Gordon Relativistic Wave eqn. in electromagnetic potentials (d+(iq/hbar)AEM)·(d+(iq/hbar)AEM)=-(moc / hbar)2: Klein-Gordon Relativistic Wave eqn. w/ electromagnetic potentials (∂·∂)+(iq/hbar)(∂·AEM+AEM·∂)+(iq/hbar)2(AEM·AEM)=-(moc / hbar)2: Klein-Gordon Relativistic Wave eqn. w/ electromagnetic potentials if (∂·AEM+AEM·∂)=0 then (∂/c∂t,-del)·(∂/c∂t,-del)+(iq/hbar)2((VEM/c, aEM)·(VEM/c, aEM))=-(moc / hbar)2 (∂2/c2∂t2-del·del)+(iq/hbar)2( (VEM/c)2-(aEM·aEM) )=-(moc / hbar)2 (∂2/c2∂t2+(iq/chbar)2(VEM2)-(del·del+(iq/hbar)2(aEM·aEM) )=-(moc / hbar)2 if ∂·AEM & AEM·∂ = 0 then (∂2/c2∂t2+(iq/chbar)2(VEM2)-( del·del+(iq/hbar)2(aEM·aEM) )=-(moc / hbar)2 ...not finished... Newtonian ApproximationsE2 = p·p c2 + mo2c4: Relativistic Energy of a particleE2 = mo2c4 + p·p c2 E2 = mo2c4 * [1 + p·p / mo2c2] E = ± moc2 * √[ 1 + p·p / mo2c2 ] E ~ ± moc2 * [ 1 + p·p / 2mo2c2 + ...] for p2<<mo2c2 E ~ ± [moc2 + p·p / 2mo + ...] choosing the positive root and discarding higher order terms... E ~ Eo +|p|2 / 2mo Total Energy = Rest Energy + Newtonian Momentum term ∂·∂=(∂/c∂t,-del)·(∂/c∂t,-del)=∂2/c2∂t2-del·del=-(moc / hbar)2: Klein-Gordon Relativistic Wave eqn. ∂2/c2∂t2 = del·del-(moc / hbar)2 ∂2/c2∂t2 = (imoc / hbar)2+del·del (i hbar)2∂2/c2∂t2 = (i hbar)2(imoc / hbar)2+(i hbar)2del·del (i hbar)2∂2/c2∂t2 = (moc)2+(i hbar)2del·del (i hbar)2∂2/∂t2 = (moc2)2*[1 + (i hbar/moc)2del·del] (i hbar)∂/∂t = ± (moc2)*√[1 + (i hbar/moc)2del·del] (i hbar)∂/∂t ~ ± (moc2)*[1 + (1/2)*(i hbar/moc)2del·del + ...] for (hbar)2*del·del<<(moc)2 ,generally a very good approx. for non-relativistic systems (i hbar)∂/∂t ~ ± [(moc2) + (i2 hbar2/2mo)del·del + ...] choosing the positive root and discarding higher order terms... (i hbar)∂/∂t ~ (moc2) - (hbar2/2mo)|del|2 (i hbar)∂/∂t ~ V(t,r) - ( hbar2/2mo)|del|2 becomes the time dependent Schrödinger eqn. by equating rest energy with the potential energy of the particle Interesting Relations(K =mo/hbarU=wo/c2 U) gives (c2/vphase n = u) Both the wave vector and particle velocity point in the same direction; along the worldline. The product of the phase velocity and the particle velocity always equals c2 (vphase * u = c2). In the case of photons, the phase velocity=particle velocity=c. In the case of matter particles, the phase velocity vphase = c2/u > c and particle velocity u<c. What does this mean? Suppose that you have a collection of particles traveling at identical velocities that all flash at the same time. The vphase is the speed at which the flash moves in other reference frames, and can be considered the speed of propagation of simultaneity. For particles which are at rest, the vphase is infinite, which makes sense since they all appear to flash simultaneously.(∂·∂)AEM=µ0 J+∂(∂·AEM) Inhomogeneous Maxwell Equation (∂·∂)AEM=µ0 J Homogeneous Maxwell/Lorentz Equation (if ∂·AEM=0 Lorentz Gauge) ∂·J=dp/∂t +del·j=0 Conservation of EMcurrent Psi=a E e -iK·R Photon Wave Equation (Solution to Maxwell Equation) E·K=0 The Polarization of a photon is orthogonal to the WaveVector of that photon P·Uobs=E/c γ[uobs]c-p·γ[uobs] uobs=γ[uobs](E-p·uobs) P·Uobs[uobs=0]=E (RestFrame Invariant expression for energy) K·Uobs=w/c γ[uobs]c-k·γ[uobs] uobs=γ[uobs](w-k·uobs) K·Uobs[uobs=0]=w (RestFrame Invariant expression for angular frequency) R·Uobs=ct γ[uobs]c-r·γ[uobs] uobs=γ[uobs](c2t-p·uobs) R·Uobs[uobs=0]/c2=t (RestFrame Invariant expression for time) J·Uobs=cp γ[uobs]c-j·γ[uobs] uobs=γ[uobs](pc2-j·uobs) J·Uobs[uobs=0]/c2=p (RestFrame Invariant expression for ElecChargeDensity) Fuv=∂uAv-∂vAu Electromagnetic Field Tensor (F0i=-Ei,Fij=eijkBk) L = -1/4 Fuv Fuv - Ju Au : Lagrangian Density for EM field L= -moc2/γ -V: Relativistic Lagrangian function of a Particle in a Conservative Potential VEM=q U·AEM/γ: Potential of EM field LEM = -moc2/γ - q U·AEM/γ = - (P·P/m0 + q0U·AEM)/γ = - (m0U·U + q0U·AEM)/γ d/dτ = U·∂ = γ d/dt U·∂/γ=∂/∂t + u·del=d/dt : Convective Derivative Quantum Commutation & SR Uncertainty Relations[ ∂u , Rv ] = ∂u Rv - Rv ∂u = gμν quantum commutator with pure 4-gradient [since ( Rv ∂u = 0) generally???]but K = i d [ Ku , Rv ] = i gμν quantum commutator with 4-wave vector but P = hbar K [ Pu , Rv ] = i hbar gμν quantum commutator with 4-momentum [ Ru , Pv ] = Ru Pv - Pv Ru = (- i hbar gμν) SR quantum commutator with 4-momentum this gives [ x , px ] = [ y , py ] = [ z , pz ] = (i hbar) [ ct , E/c ] = [ t , E ] = (- i hbar) :assuming that one can treat the time as an operator... both of these yield the familiar uncertainty relations: Generalized Uncertainty relation: (Δ A) * (Δ B) >= (1/2) |< i[A,B] >| see Sudbury pg. 59 for a great derivation (Δ x * Δ px >= hbar / 2) and (Δ t * Δ E >= hbar / 2) or more generally (Δ Ru * Δ Pv >= hbar duv / 2) or (Δ Ru * Δ Kv >= duv / 2) (Δ x * Δ kx >= 1/2) and (Δ t * Δ w >= 1/2) [ Ru , Rv ] = Ru Rv - Rv Ru = 0 : All position coordinates commute [ Pu , Pv ] = Pu Pv - Pv Pu = 0 : All momentum coordinates commute While I'm at it, a small comment about the quantum uncertainty relation. A great many books state that the quantum uncertainty relations mean that a "particle" cannot simultaneously have precise properties of position and momentum. I disagree with that interpretation. The uncertainty relations, the mathematical structure of the argument, say nothing about "simultaneous" measurements. They do say something about "sequential" measurements. A measurement of one variable places the system in a state such that if the next measurement is that of a non-commuting variable of the first, then the uncertainty must be of a minimum>0 amount. Also, note that the uncertainty relations are not necessarily about the size of h. Nor are they about the factor of i in the commutation relation. It would appear that they are about the metric gμν itself, which has a non-zero result for sequential, non-commuting measurements. Also, a comment on the EPR results. Based on SR, one cannot say that the measurement of one particle immediately "collapses" the physical state of the other. Since the two entangled particles can be setup such that they are space-like separated at the "events" of their respective measurement, there exist coordinate frames in which the measurement of the 1st particle occurs before that of the 2nd, exactly at the same time as the 2nd, and after that of the 2nd. Thus, how is the first particle to "know" that it must collapse the wavefunction of the 2nd, or that it must itself be collapsed by the 2nd? -------- need to derive: (Δ phix * Δ Lx >= hbar / 2) where phix is angle about x, and Lx is angular momentum about x Light Cone| time-like interval(+) / light-like interval(0) worldline | References (on 4-Vectors in SR & QM in SR)Classical Dynamics of Particles & Systems, 3rd Ed., Jerry B. Marion & Stephen T. Thornton (Chap14)Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd Ed., J.D. Jackson (Chap11,12) Classical Mechanics, 2nd Ed., Herbert Goldstein (Chap7,12) Electromagnetic Field, The, Albert Shadowitz (Chap13-15) First Course in General Relativity, A, Bernard F. Schutz (Chap1-4) Fundamental Formulas of Physics, Donald H. Menzel (Chap6) Introduction to Electrodynamics, 2nd Ed., David J. Griffiths (Chap10) Introduction to Modern Optics, 2nd Ed., Grant R. Fowles (var) Introduction to Special Relativity, 2nd Ed., Wolfgang Rindler (All) (**pg60-65,82-86**) Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Gordon Baym (Chap22,23) Modern Elementary Particle Physics: The Fundamental Particles and Forces?, Gordon Kane (Chap2+) Path Integrals and Quantum Processes, Mark Swanson (var) Quantum Electrodynamics, Richard P. Feynman (Lec7-rest) Quantum Mechanics, Albert Messiah (Chap20) Quantum Mechanics and the Particles of Nature: An Outline for Mathematicians, Anthony Sudbery (Chap7) Relativistic Quantum Fields, Mark Hindmarsh, Sussex, UK Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity, Sean M. Carroll (var) Statistical Mechanics, R.K. Pathria (Chap6.5) Theory of Spinors, The, E'lie Cartan (var) Topics in Advanced Quantum Mechanics, Barry R. Holstein (Chap3,6,7) This remains a work in progress.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||