|
|||||||||||
WHO IS BEING UNSCIENTIFIC?AIMING FOR THE RESTORATION OF SCIENCE AIMING TO RESCUE SCIENCE FROM DOGMATIC SCIENTISTS
THAT THE ORIGIN OF LIFE IS A PROBLEM THAT SCIENCE HASN'T SOLVED YET!! Stanley Miller in the 60s, in his attempt to simulate creation of life in the early earth, failed many times in his "intelligently designed" experiments before he succeeded in obtaining some amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. However, were you told that he manipulated various scenarios of the early earth and not just one? He failed many times before he succeeded? His experiments were intelligently designed and not random chance? To form proteins from amino acids is a bigger problem than forming amino acids? Did your professor ever encourage you to think that no trial and error experiments were going on in the early earth using chemicals beakers and flasks? Did you ever stop and think that INTELLIGENT experiments are being designed and used by these pseudo scientists to deny that there was any INTELLIGENCE involved in the origin of life? Were you told that no matter how many early universe scenarios are conjectured, life never pops up.? No! What you have been told, based on the ideology of modern biologists is that the origin of life is no longer a problem, the "soup" answers it all. The FACT is that the "soup" only creates new questions. The origin of life is a genuine enigma for science. Were you told that by your professor ?
Biochemical systems, like blood clotting, vision, and many functions of the cell are IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX. Many systems backed by proper enzymes triggered by catalysts work together, automated to precision , working towards one desired goal in synchrony, to generate the result needed. No gradual system can ever explain their origin. IF one part is missing the whole system fails. IF one part is crude the consequences are disastrous. If we scan the literature that seeks to explain the development of these systems based on evolution by natural selection, there is none. Darwinism at the macro level requires faith as there are NO SCIENTIFIC FACTS to support it. Was it presented to you as such? No! The Church of Darwin is being nurtured by these pseudo scientists who indoctrinate our youth to blind faith in Darwinism.
The numerical values that nature has assigned to the fundamental constants, such as the charge on the electron, the mass of the proton, and the Newtonian Gravitational constant, are critically relevant to the structure of the universe that we perceive. As more and more physical systems from nuclei to galaxies have become better understood, science has begun to realize that many characteristics of these systems are remarkably sensitive to the precise value of the fundamental constants. There is NO NATURAL REASON why the constants have the values they have. The facts point to values being set with a purpose in mind. Had nature opted for a slightly different set of numbers, the world would have been a very different place and WE WOULD NOT BE HERE TO SEE IT. The values of the constants were INTELLIGENTLY SET.
WE WANT TO RESTORE SCIENCE TO ITS RIGHTFUL PLACE.
Muhammed Asadi. |
|||||||||||