This Document Will Self Destruct In 30
Seconds. Also known as Personality On Parade: A
Psychoanalytic Analysis of the Zine Revolution.
Fred Wright's 1995 master's thesis (at Kent State U.),
reprinted in zine
format. Well worth reading even if, like me, you skim over the passages
on psychoanalysis.
Chapter One discusses "History and Characterisics of Zines":
ancestors & relatives like chapbooks, broadsides, dadaism,
& samizdat;
techniques like detournement & other "appropriation of mainstream
cultural icons"; the social & personal nature of zines.
Chapter Two, "Reasons For Zine Publication", gets into
the psychoanalytic theory. The coverage of such topics
as therapy, community, propaganda, & the drive for recognition
is clear enough even for this lay reader; Lacan's Orders & the
object a will presumably be of some interest
to readers familiar with that theory or wishing to be.
"The Effects of Zines on Readers and Society", the third
& final chapter, deals mainly with the politics of networking.
It closes with a discussion of "the most important testament to
the potential power of zines", the famous Michael Diana obscentiy
conviction.
Each chapter is extensively footnoted & there's a great bibliography.
Actually two of 'em: about 70 books & articles are cited along
with a separate list of 100 zines with contact information.
48 digest pages for $2. 710 Stinaff St. Kent OH 44240.
An Anti-Academic
New Philistine. I reviewed #40 in IU #2;
editor Karl Wenclas is still at it -- #41 has a tirade
against Thomas Pynchon, "the darling of academics because he is
intellectualism run amok", with quotes from Gravity's
Rainbow presented as evidence. I happen to disagree (and
loved GR long before I became an academic).
Pynchon's technique seems tightly controlled to me;
anything but "amok".
But it's sure fun to see somebody getting so worked up about
literature. Wenclas obviously reads a lot of "literary"
fiction
but is usually disappointed: the field is dominated
by bourgeois writers out
of touch with the real America (not to mention lots of outright
foreigners), concerned mainly with detailed
description & empty analysis of unimportant & uninteresting
non-events. He's probably right, too. I pretty much
quit reading short stories years ago, contemporary or not,
literary or not. He chastises the establishment for their
lack of contentiousness. I agree again. It's fun reading
these passionate attacks -- on Pynchon,
John Gardner (in #40), Joyce Carol Oates (#38), many others -- literati
with "craft but no talent". To a lesser extent,
he also bashes underground writers with "talent, but no craft;
whose easy ability shows in their utter lack of revision".
But NP isn't all bile; Wenclas sees in Madison
Smartt Bell, for example, a writer capable of overcoming
the "micorophilosophical musings of academe" to
write for a popular audience. He likes old-school writers
like Fitzgerald, from an era when the
short story was a mass medium.
There's an ongoing mystery story which of course I mostly skipped.
The occasional handwritten rant in NP gives it
a nice borderline-psychotic feel you just can't
get anywhere but a zine.
4474 Third #203 Detroit MI 48201.