Evolution Evolution Creation Creation Design Birds Woodpecker
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. You are welcome to check it out now. But
Please return around December 15th when it will be closer to completion.
Site is currently 30% complete. Latest inputs 11/26/96.
This is SIZE=4
EVOLUTION: ...as it is used in this web site does
NOT simply mean "Change."
The usage here is with reference to what used to be referred to as "The
General Theroy Of Evolution." Herein we are concerned with the
following:
- THE CHANGING OF ONE KIND OF LIFE INTO ANOTHER.
(Non-Living Organic
Molucles to Single Celled Life to Multi-Cellular Invertebrates to Fish
to Amphibian to Reptile to Mammal to Primate to Man.)
- THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOMETHING TOTALLY "NEW."
An eye where there was
no eye before; A feather where there was no feather; a wing where there
was no wing; the Woodpeckers tongue from an ordinary birds tongue; etc.
CREATION: ... a period in the past where a
supreme being - God- made the universe, sun, planets, moon, stars
and all that we find in or on them.
- also included is the setting in motion of the laws of mathemathics,
physics, thermodynamics, chemistry, and the natural sciences.
- Creation includes the original forming of the plants and animals with
their ordinal [i e defining] characteristics complete.
This is NOT
equivalent to saying that "No Change"
can occur after the creation events. The Creator utilized
a complex genetic code found with in every cell of of an organism. This genetic
code allows for great variation within a given "kind." However, very
definite limits on the degree of variation that can occur are set
with in the genetic code itself.
- The nature of creation is such that it would inherently [not deceptively]
include an "apparent age."
"KIND": ...is not synomonous with the
biologists "species," "genera," or "class;" albeit it has a very
specific meaning. A "kind" as used herein is made up of those animials
which are capable of breeding and producing fertile offspring.
This is generally broader than the biologists species and less inclusive
than class.
Note, it is not based on whether they actually do breed in nature, but
whether if such a mating occurred the resultant offspring would be non-sterile.
All dogs would fall in one kind which also would include wolves etc.
--------------------
Return to Top of Page
Return to Top of Page
Return to Top of Page
Copyright © 1996 William D. Gates Last Modified October 18,
1996.
Return to Top of Page
Return to Homepage
---------------------
EVOLUTION: ...as it is used in this web site does
- THE CHANGING OF ONE KIND OF LIFE INTO ANOTHER.
(Non-Living
- THE DEVELOPMENT OF "NEW."
An eyetongue; etc.
--------------------
|